Shamah-Elim Bible Studies

Site overview
Random posting
Newest articles
Prophetic words
Pending interpretation
Questions & Answers
Trains of thought
Latest postings
Audio snippets
Postings in other languages
Changes to articles
Copyright info
Contact info




ClustrMaps Map Image

Prophetic word for today
Georgia (Part 10)


This is a continuation of a prophetic word posted earlier ...


Click here to view the original text of the prophetic word sent to us on 17 May 2012.


Our comments


The pandamic

Even though we have already briefly discussed the meaning of the bamboo mentioned by sister Tracey in her word, there is an additional layer of prophetic meaning that has been more and more evident as events have unfolded in recent years. Even though this word was emailed on 17 May 2012, it was actually a subtle prophecy from God about many of the things that are happening now. As I had a chance to rewatch the video referenced by sister Tracy in her word (a video that was also recorded in 2012), I was stunned at how, without me realising it, the Lord was actually prophesying about things that would happen 8 to 10 years later. This writer now understands why I was so intrigued about having to talk about "bamboo" and Chinese characters in those videos and why sister Tracy's heart paused when she came to that part of the video. I pray that, after meditating on this posting, you will also have greater understanding on what the Lord was saying 10 years ago in those videos and how it clarifies even further the spiritual underpinnings of the things that have happened in the last 2 years (at the time of this writing).


A morning not too many weeks ago, after having realised days earlier that the Lord wanted us to continue this series on Georgia, I was thinking about the bamboo in sister Tracey's word, feeling as if I had been "missing" something all these years. I then began to think about panda bears, the famous bamboo eaters, and wondered what they represented in all of this. I then realised how the word "pandemic" seems to have the word "panda" in it. I then decided to think of the word as "pandamic" instead of "pandemic", and that is when it hit me: We have been in the middle of a "pandamic" where the world's matriarchal forces have been endeavouring to turn us into "pandas", doing so with great success due to the worthless conservative base in America and the world that has remained doggedly stuck in the black-horse stage, refusing to fully embrace God's green-horse nature. As this flurry of thoughts hit my heart and mind, I went towards the window where I live and looked out, and, as I turned to my left, I literally saw a panda bear directly staring up at me. Mind you, it was not a "live" panda bear. It was a toy (teddy-like) panda bear that had been put on display on a window case of the children's bookstore across the street. Oddly enough, the panda bear had been placed at a very peculiar angle, in such a way that it was literally staring up directly at me even though it was at ground level and some 10 to 20 yards to the left of my third-floor window. When I felt the direct stare of the toy panda bear, I understood that the Lord was confirming that He had placed the "pandamic" thoughts in my heart.


The question then becomes: What does it mean that we were collectively turned into "pandas" and why was the enemy doing this? To answer that question, we must meditate on the nature of the great panda.


The (not-so-)great panda

Even though it was debated for some time, it has now been genetically established beyond any doubt that pandas are indeed bears. The reason for the debate is that, even though pandas look like bears, they do not behave like bears. Whereas "regular" bears are aggressive and intimidating hunters, pandas are passive and do not inspire much fear. Whereas "regular" bears have a diet abundant in meat from the animals that they kill, pandas have a mostly "vegetarian" diet centred around bamboo. One might think that these differences stem from panda bears having a digestive system tailored for bamboo. However, it turns out that panda bears have a carnivore digestive system similar to those of "regular" bears and can actually digest meat without problem. In fact, panda bears have been known to eat carrion or meat from birds or rodents on occasions. However, they always seem to gravitate towards bamboo, despite the fact that they derive little energy and protein from it.


According to, pandas are able to digest the cellulose in bamboo because of bacteria that they are not born with and which they actually acquire from their mother's faeces. This means that their diet is not the direct product of their genetics but their "upbringing", i.e. something that they "pick up" from their mother after they are born, and which they pick up from the excrement their "upbringers" produce.


From the above, we can gain a picture of what giant pandas represent in a negative spiritual sense. Instead of being "evangelistic hunters" that roam the forest to "conquer" other animals for food, they are more-or-less sedentary creatures that (literally) sit around all day eating long stalks that they did not grow or work for. Instead of exhibiting "male" strength and warrior aggressiveness, they exhibit a more "female" weakness and docile "pacifism". This forces them to spend their entire day feeding on food of little nutritional value in order to subsist until they die, and they are led down this path because they receive a "contamination" from their mother's excrement. Therefore, giant pandas represent people who have had their spirit "masculinity" stripped from them by the pastoral matriarchy and the soulish contamination it has brought them up with, condemning them to a life of sad spiritual weakness in which their spirit nature is never fed and nurtured.


Pink black-and-white

According to, pandas are born pink, blind, and toothless. After 1 or 2 weeks, they turn grey in the parts where their hair will eventually turn black and the non-grey parts eventually turn from pink to white, leading to the final black-and-white combination. This has profound spiritual significance. Pink is a colour commonly associated with femininity, meaning that, on one level, the panda's "pink" birth points to how it is condemned to a life of "feminine", "soulish" weakness and passivity instead of "masculine" spirit strength and expansion. As we have shared before regarding frogs, the colour pink points in a negative sense to the "thrones" of the Canaanite-Amorite frog spirit, thereby emphasising the matriarchal dominion that the panda bear is born under. On another level, the pandas' colour transformation points to the connection between pandas and the 4 horses of the Apocalypse. As we have shared before, the colour pink is actually a shade of red produced by combining red and white. Given that those are the colours of the first 2 horses of the Apocalypse, we can say that the panda's initial pink colour also points in a subtle way towards the first 2 horses. The fact that the panda's pink colour fades away and becomes white means that the "redness" is taken out of him (since pink comes from adding red to white). Given that the red horse is the horse of "pestilence" and "conflict", this means that a panda soul may have had a white-horse epiphany (meaning that it had become aware of its New-Covenant status) and a vague understanding that it needed to stir "red-horse internal conflict" as a result of that epiphany, but it is a soul that somehow allowed the pastoral matriarchy spirit to drain that "red conflict" out of it in order to turn it into a docile, "non-trouble-making" panda.


The fact that the panda ends up as a black-and-white animal points to a "horse transition" that goes from the white horse (the 1st horse) to the black horse (the 3rd horse) without ever transitioning to the green horse (the 4th and final horse) whilst at the same time having the red horse (the 2nd horse) "properly neutralised" by the pastoral matriarchy spirit. This makes for a soul that is utterly unable to enter into the green-horse stage in righteousness, for its spiritual process is utterly incomplete. A panda soul still has the remnants of some "whiteness" in it, i.e. some "white-horse epiphany" on it, so it looks and sounds as if it is looking for a "new world" and is aware that there is something amiss with the current, "old world". It also shows signs of "blackness", i.e. separation from "old structures" and relative "loneliness" in the black-horse wilderness. However, it is devoid of any interest in any "red-horse fighting" against prevailing spiritual structures if they are too prevalent or appealing to his natural soul. That is why it has no interest in pushing towards green-horse territory, even if it can occasionally see a faint "green light" flashing in the distant horizon. Why engage in a pathetic one-man fight and give yourself in sacrificial green-horse death for anything if you neither have the red-horse fighting spirit in you nor a visceral revulsion towards the prevalent spiritual structures?


The panda soul may feel "safe" in its pink-docile black-and-white world, feeling validated by its "white" awareness of a need for "something new" and its "black" willingness to distance itself from unrighteous structures of the past (or present) that are not prevalent within its world. However, as we have emphasised before, you cannot permanently remain in the black-horse wilderness, for it was never intended to be a "permanent residence". This means that the spiritual cycle will inevitably continue, and you will inevitably progress towards the green-horse stage, even if it is as an enemy of God. Said another way, those decidedly stuck in the black-horse stage will inevitably fall prey to the allures of Korah, the remnant's nemesis during the green-horse stage. As a result, stuck-in-black souls will end up carrying out "green" activities, but they will be "green" activities propelled by the Hittitely-deceptive Korah spirit.


Pandas left and right

Sadly, it must be said that, in America, the "pandafication" of society has happened on both sides of the political spectrum. The liberally-influenced youth know that a "new world order" is needed to replace the current, dilapidated order, and they are willing to distance themselves from what they perceive to be America's "imperialistic and racist" past. However, they are not willing to question and challenge prevailing notions the way a red-horse rider would, so they end up embracing anything and anyone that claims to be "revolutionary" and "progressive". They sigh a sigh of relief when they look around them and see the liberal, "revolutionary" agenda of the left prevailing all around them because they know it means that they do not need to fight. They just need to ride the wave, to follow the orders of Korah, who, as we have shared before, resides at a slightly higher level of "consciousness" than the "simple panda" and can guide all the pandas to the "new world order" that they believe is needed. The pandas' pink hearts never question, never challenge Korah's assertions. That takes too much energy, too much effort, and the bamboo that they feed on does not provide them with enough energy to do so. Therefore, they prefer to find a decent bamboo patch and just sit there to chew it down, one painfully long stalk at a time until they have had enough to subsist for another day. They occasionally get up to engage in "greenish" activities, but it is always in "collective" endeavours, within the safety of the panda group, with no need to ever commit a true, "self-destructive" sacrifice because Korah and his activity organisers have "everything under control".


Even though the die-hard conservative American is quick to recognise all of the above traits in left-wing Americans, they fail to realise that, in God's eyes, they do exactly the same things as the liberals, only in a subtler way. Just like their liberal counterparts, they have experienced a "white-horse epiphany" of some sort and are aware that the current world order needs to be overthrown and replaced with a "new world order". However, they would never use the phrase "new world order" to describe it, for that is a term intimately linked in their hearts and minds with nut-job, leftist radical liberalism. Even though one could argue that they are right in saying that they do not wish a "new world order", in God's eyes, they do, but is, in fact, the "previous world order" left behind by the Founding Fathers, with potentially a few bells and whistles added to it to bolster it and make it even closer to "perfection" than it already was. They may be a little "redder" than their liberal counterparts in the sense that they appear more willing to engage in red-horse questioning and confrontation. However, that "red-horse fighting nature" is only applied to anything coming from the mouths of the leftist leaders and their followers. In their minds, if a leftist said it, it must be questioned and questioned until it is proved wrong. And, even though this is the right attitude to take most of the time, the die-hard American conservative never ever dares to apply that "red-horse fighting attitude" towards anything that is in any way related to the Founding Fathers or the "glorious American past" that they somehow want to return to. It never dawns on them that the destruction wrought by liberals on America has been enabled by the vast gaping holes and massive mistakes made by the Founding Fathers when they drafted the U.S. Constitution and established the current American system of government.


The conservative panda

As we have shared in excruciating detail in our audio snippets, the U.S. Constitution does not even bother to protect or clearly define basic rights such as the right to property or the right to life (of the born, mind you). It does not even attempt to protect you from the tyranny of state governments, given that it was a document designed to protect citizens from the federal government only, and it has only been through artificial "incorporation" efforts by the judicial branch that the few, vaguely defined rights in the U.S. Constitution have been allowed to "trickle" down to the state or local level. The die-hard American conservative panda never dares to question the stupidity of the Founding Fathers in giving the states a carte blanche (in the Constitution) to define election laws as they wish, even if the elections involve federal offices that can have consequences on other states. They then stand appalled that local politicians in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Arizona could pass laws that enable voting fraud and allowed the 2020 election to be flagrantly stolen. In their eyes, it was the "evil democrats" who perpetrated this travesty, but they never bother to ask whether the Founding Fathers are to blame for leaving behind a system that would enable corrupt liberals to carry out massive fraud years later. These American conservative pandas are appalled by the outrageous actions of whores like nancy pelosi and mitch mcconnell, but they never stop chewing their conservative bamboos for a second to realise that the Founding Fathers were the ones who enabled the offices of "Speaker of the House" and "Majority Leader" (the latter being enabled implicitly by allowing each legislative chamber the freedom to define their rules and processes as they wished). These American conservative pandas never bother to meditate on the terrible accumulation of political power that is enabled by the layered, elitist legislative system that the Founding Fathers enabled. They never bother to wonder whether we need to devise a new, more democratic legislative system where political parties can be castrated and stripped of their power so that people with ideas (rather than political connections) can prevail in a free and democratic process that exalts the value of the individual lawmaker and citizen. To these pandas, the solution is to apply useless band-aids such as "term limits" and anti-abortion laws at the state level. They go pink-belly-soft when it comes to questioning anything the Founding Fathers did, and they go googly-eyed when they see an American flag waving and someone singing "God bless America", for it makes them think of the "new world order" that they (not the liberals) are aiming for, i.e. the "glorious" past that the "evil democrats" so heartlessly ruined for all of us. All the while, the idiot American conservative panda fails to realise that God despises that "glorious past" and that that American Republic that they wish to return to died on November 5, 2008, the day after America stupidly elected barack hussein obastard to soil the White House for 8 years. Returning to the fundamentally flawed America that the Founding Fathers left behind is like propping up a cadaver, putting make-up on it, and dressing it with fancy new clothes, pretending as if "our great leader" has returned from the dead to continue that "wonderful paradise" known as America.


What is disturbing about the American conservative panda is that, as opposed to its liberal counterpart, the spirit of Korah deception that moves it is much more subtle and destructive in the long term than its liberal counterpart. To anyone with common sense, the spirit of deception that moves through liberals is clear and plain as day, and the destruction it produces is evident and impossible to ignore. By contrast, the spirit of Korah deception that moves through conservatives is very dark and sinister, from the darkest corners of satan, but it comes in the form of an "alternative version of the truth"; it comes as a "little-known secret truth" that explains how the liberals were able to wreak so much havoc within such a "perfect" and "wonderful" system as the one that the Founding Fathers left behind. Sadly, this version of Korah deception also offers its followers a "green light of hope" in the form of a prediction that guarantees that "all will be set right with the world" as some behind-the-scenes, secret rescue plan is carried out. These green flashes of hope are designed to prevent American conservatives despairing over the continued success of the liberal onslaught, since such a despair could potentially force them to start applying their red-horse, contrarian tendencies towards the conservative values that they have held near and dear for so long.


As some of you may have already inferred, that spirit of Korah deception that stuck-in-black conservatives are so open to is the one responsible for movements such as "QAnon", which claimed to have information on secret and immoral shenanigans by liberal elites and also claimed to know of secret actions being performed by conservatism-supporting operatives to expose these shenanigans, send the liberal elites to jail, and rescue the nation from its liberal decline. However, this salvation never materialised, not because it was "unsuccessful" but because it never existed in the first place. Even though some of the liberal shenanigans described by the "QAnon" people may have had many elements of truth to them, they came with an exaggeration and a level of collusion that was never there. However, these claims served satan's purpose of soothing the conservatives' ears by reassuring them that the root of the problem is the level of evil in liberal leaders and that conservatism will somehow prevail through some secret, behind-the-scenes operation that the public are not privy to. So, like good little pandas, they sat and waited as they munched on their QAnon stalks, and things only worsened in the dead and rotting American Republic.


This dark spirit of Korah deception that moves through conservatives is also responsible for the "Great Reset" conspiracy theory, a theory that has many elements of truth but is, at the end of the day, a false theory that proposes a grand, well-integrated plan that does not exist. The elements of truth in this theory stem from the reality of a centralised group of Jezebelian spiritual forces conspiring to prevent God's latter-rain manifestation. And, even though there are high levels of collusion in the efforts of liberals to forge a "new world" where their false ideology reigns with fascistic power, the collusion is not as deep and centralised as the proponents of the "Great Reset" claim, and many of the grand plans theorised in this "Great Reset" are simply not real (at least in the natural).


The Middle Eastern shiboleths

The dark spirit of Korah deception that prevails amongst American conservatives, especially amongst the avant-garde Christians who are friendly to God's remnant message, has been openly exposed in the spirit realm by a story that has been dominating the headlines at the time of this writing: the invasion of Ukraine by putin's Russia.


This writer has made a deliberate effort not to pay too much attention to who says what about the invasion because I am aware that the spiritual truth behind this invasion is completely beyond the understanding of both liberal and conservative Americans. Unbeknownst to this writer, the Lord God of Israel had me declaring the truth about this conflict almost 17 years ago to the day in a posting titled "The Tyre treason". If you click on the previous link and read its contents without scrolling up to see the date when it was written and posted, you may inadvertently think that it was written in response to current events.


The 20-year mulligan

As we have said before, the spiritual cycle that started in 1998 was aborted because of the American Church's collective stupidity, and the entire cycle was forced to repeat itself 20 years later, starting in 2018. This is why many of the things that happened around 20 years ago are repeating themselves, and, sadly, it would seem as if we did not learn our lessons and are doing everything worse in this merciful do-over that we have been granted. It is no coincidence, for example, that France won its first ever World Cup in 1998 (when the first cycle started) and won its second World Cup 20 years later, in 2018 (when the second cycle started).


The election theft attempt

It is no coincidence either that there were highly controversial elections in 2000, when al gore (a.k.a. rich chicken-little) and his demonrat, hanging-chad cohorts almost stole the election from George W. Bush and that, 20 years later, in 2020, there would be another highly controversial election between Donald J. Trump and a senile, hair-sniffing pervert. Unfortunately, this second time around, the demonrats were able to pull off the steal.


The terrorist assault from Afghanistan

As we all know, the U.S. suffered a terrorist attack that originated from the caves of Afghanistan, an attack that killed 3,000 innocent martyrs and was intended to bring great humiliation to the American nation. Contrary to what the Afghanistan-based terrorists and their taliban enablers expected, America rallied around New York and rose up with a level of collective patriotic and spiritual fervour that had not been seen in America for decades (if ever, when you consider certain aspects of it). Suddenly, after decades of shying away from God, Americans felt no qualms about fervently singing "God bless America" in full stadiums at the start of ballgames. After decades of seeing themselves as "evil imperialists", Americans felt no qualms about enlisting to defend the land of liberty against enemies at home and abroad. Churches began to fill up as Americans began to perceive that there was more to life than just "existing". Unfortunately, as we shared many years ago, the bastard matriarchals that run the American Church saw this as a vindication of their soulish system and as an opportunity to expand their putrid queendoms and influence in American society. Instead of waking up themselves (just as the rest of America was waking up), the Church's matriarchal leaders saw the movement as an opportunity to cement their power, which led to God "turning off the switch" and to the spiritual awakening dying off as quickly as it had started.


Twenty years later, in 2021, the story repeated itself, only in a slightly different way, but with a very sad and different ending. As you may know, the senile hair-sniffer (whose soon-to-start eternal torment in the fires of hell will be intense and insufferable beyond human description) decided to pull the American presence out of Afghanistan and hand over "vindicating" control back to the terrorist taliban (for no reason at all, since the taliban were in a position of weakness and had no "chips" to negotiate with). In doing so, the senile bastard mockingly defecated on the 20 years of blood and sacrifice that Americans had poured into Afghanistan (mishandled and unnecessarily protracted as the occupation was, the sacrifice made over those years still deserved to be treated with honour and respect). By unilaterally handing Afghanistan to the taliban, like a prostitute happily surrendering to her client for free, the senile bastard defecated on the dismembered limbs and tear-stained tombs of the Americans who had given so much in Afghanistan (and Iraq). And, not only did the senile bastard bend over for free to the taliban rapists, he actually paid them at the end of the rape with billions of dollars in military equipment that the taliban could now use to promote terrorism against America. As the deliberately hasty and disorganised pull-out happened, thousands of Americans and sympathisers were left trapped in Afghanistan, facing the prospect of torture and murder by the taliban. In other words, the taliban were enabled to terrorise, i.e. carry out a terrorist attack, against Americans and against American property and installations, which was tantamount to an attack on American soil, just like the one on 9/11. The only reason why God did not allow a repeat of a terrorist attack on American soil is that America had already paid a redemptive price through its obedience in tearing down the saddam hussein and taliban regimes in 2002 and 2003, and, unlike the senile defecator, God was not about to ignore that sacrifice, lost as America has become.


Sadly, America's response to the humiliation attempt coming from Afghanistan was markedly different in 2021 when compared to 2001. Instead of rallying around the Americans being terrorised and murdered by the butchers from Afghanistan, America turned its collective head the other way and pretended as if nothing had happened. Instead of rising up in indignation and asking God to bless America and defeat their enemies, most Americans were either indifferent or convinced that "we had it coming to us" because "the white guy is always the bad guy, no matter what the backstory may be". Yes, a few conservatives were outraged at the evil that had just transpired, but the story quickly faded away from the American consciousness, and, to this day, few, if any, Americans can actually say how many Americans and Afghani sympathisers were able to escape and how many were brutally murdered after the American troops left in Saigon-style shame. That is how little we collectively cared about the 9/11 terrorism that had just been perpetrated. Thus, America had yet again responded even worse during the do-over than the first time.


A dictator's abuse of a weak nation

It is no coincidence that, in 2002, the U.S. was engrossed in the middle of a deep debate on whether to rescue a nation from the grips of a dictator, i.e. the Iraqi and Kurdish people from the evil hands of long-time dictator saddam hussein, and that, 20 years later, in 2022, the U.S. is now engrossed in the middle of a deep debate on whether to rescue a nation from the grips of a dictator, i.e. the Ukrainian people from the grips of long-time dictator vladimir putin. It is no coincidence either, that Iraq, an important oil producer, was under oil sanctions then and that Russia, an important oil producer, is under oil sanctions now.


As we shared before, God was calling the U.S. and George W. Bush to attack saddam hussein during the week of September 18 through 24 in 2002, but, due to all the satanic voices around him (including those of a whore named laura and 2 young, whorish twins), Bush disobeyed God and did not act when he had to. He therefore gave saddam time to dismantle and transport his WMD materials to Syria (where a whore named assad would use them a few years later against his own people). Even so, George W. Bush finally obeyed God's orders and attacked exactly 6 months later, on 19 March 2003, and was able to easily overthrow the dictator within 21 days. Unfortunately, satan's cohorts (such as the hell-bound bastard colon powell) still had Bush's ear, and Bush refused to act decisively against Iraq's neighbours. God was calling him to immediately launch troops towards both the eastern and western borders of Iraq. God's strategy was that, as troops amassed on the western border with Syria, assad (who, at the end, is a coward) would be (explicitly and implicitly) threatened by the U.S. with the same fate as saddam's, which would have prompted him to flee the country and surrender it to more democratic people that would be careful not to do anything "anti-democratic" because of the heavy American troop presence sitting across their borders, waiting for the slightest provocation to invade. On the eastern front, the American troops facing Iran would have served as a challenge against the religious autocracy there, whose grip on the hearts and minds of the Iranians was beginning to weaken. Emboldened by the American presence to the east and by the vocal support of the U.S. government, the Iranian people would have risen up against the dictatorial aycrapollahs, which would have produced two important consequences: One, it would have helped to free the Iranian people as well, and, two, it would have prevented the Iranian regime sending terrorists across the border to destabilise Iraq and make the American presence look bad. The Iraqi people were happy to be rid of their dictator, but the Syrian and Iranian governments to either side were not, which is why their terrorists flooded into Iraq across both borders to organise attacks against the American troops, causing much unnecessary and heartless carnage against both Americans and the Iraqi population (remember all the market-square bombs?). The idiotic liberal American press kept portraying the violence as a "response of the Iraqi people against their invaders" when it was actually violence perpetrated mostly by foreigners who were hellbent on preventing Iraq enjoying the effects of freedom and democracy. Unfortunately, neither freedom nor democracy fully materialised because Bush did not obey God's plan beyond the basic invasion and overthrow of saddam hussein. Therefore, as time wore on, the weak hearts of the Iraqis fainted under the psychological, Hittite pressure of the terrorists, and the Iraqis eventually bought the propaganda coming from the true invaders (the Syrian and Iranian agents), a propaganda that was constantly echoed by the liberal Western media and silently accepted by the bastard, despised-by-God Christian, "America-first" isolationists. As a result, the Iraqis began to see the Americans as the reason for all their woes, without realising that the Americans wanted to leave but could not because of all the instability. In other words, the terrorists were creating instability, forcing the American military to prolong their stay, which then allowed the terrorists to lie and say, "See, these people want to own you and your oil; they refuse to leave". Sadly, it is as if no one in political power or with influence in the media was able to understand all of this and articulate it with Reagan-esque clarity to the American and Iraqi people, even though it was clear and plain as day to this writer and to anyone attempting to hear God's thoughts on the matter. Unfortunately, the Mark Levin's, Hannity's, and Limbaugh's in America's conservative media were too busy listening to themselves and to ghosts of Founding Fathers past to have a clue, obvious as all of it was. With no one to provide spiritual and grounded clarity to what was happening in Iraq, the American and Iraqi people grew weary of a conflict that was being prolonged by a half-hearted approach. Some people (such as Donald Rumsfeld) were able to convince Bush to move slightly away from a half-hearted approach by instituting a shock-and-awe strategy, which helped to bring some stability, but it was sadly too little too late. The American military lost the support of the weary Iraqis, and what could have turned into a shining pro-American paragon of democracy and freedom in the Middle East turned into a half-hearted democracy that harboured deep resentment against its foreign "occupiers".


In the meantime, as the Iraqi effort was being bungled, the Iranian resistance that had seen the Iraqi invasion as a sign of hope also fainted (with good reason), and the Iranian regime began to gain strength again. The Iranians would try to stand up and fight some 7 years later, around 2009, but, unfortunately for them, there was a bastard mandrill soiling the White House at the time, and their pleas for support from the U.S. were callously ignored. As a result, their movement was brutally crushed (and no one in America, not even the American people, seemed to frankly give a damn, to quote a famous Georgian).


As we said earlier, the test of how America would react to a long-time dictator trying to oppress a weaker people is repeating itself 20 years later. And, just as before, it involves a dictator with control over significant oil production that greatly affects the rest of the world. Sadly, America's reaction during this do-over is even worse than 20 years ago. Currently, left-leaning Americans are supporting Ukraine, but not because they truly understand what is happening there but because the demonrats are telling them to do so. Naturally, if Trump were still in the White House and supporting Ukraine, the demonrats would be supporting putin, and all the liberal drones that litter the American landscape (like horse manure in a 19th-century city with no street-cleaning workers) would be supporting putin as well. The demonrats know that the Russia-Ukraine conflict is a perfect scapegoat for the inflation that the senile bastard and his energy policies have created. They also know that they need to vilify Russia instead of Ukraine because, of the two, Russia is the bigger oil producer and has the larger economy, meaning that oil and economic sanctions against Russia will cause a greater shock to the U.S. and world economies and can therefore become the "logical explanation" for the pre-existing economic deterioration that the senile whore and his demonrat bastards have wrought.


"Anti-dictatorial" as the demonrats pretend to be when opposing putin, they are, in truth, not morally offended in the slightest about putin's assassination of his political opponents or the subtle oppression of the Russian people's freedoms. How can we say that? Because the demonrats actually wish that they could be more openly dictatorial like putin. Many of us have heard of how so many people have conveniently "died" or "committed suicide" after they have become a political liability to the demonrat elites (consider Joan Rivers or epstein, just to name two). We are also aware of the dictatorial and scientifically unnecessary measures and mandates that demonrats have imposed in the name of fighting the WuHan flu, measures that have led to the unnecessary deaths of thousands upon thousands of Americans in nursing homes (when they forced infected seniors in hospitals to be returned to the nursing homes and infect others), in hospitals (when they denied Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine to let people recover from the WuHan flu), in sporting events and other places (when they cajoled people into taking an experimental mRNA gene-therapy shot that causes blood clots and myocarditis), in homes of isolated people (who committed suicide after they lost their jobs and lost all hope whilst in fear-induced isolation), etc. The demonrats (and their sympathisers in Canada such as justine turd-eau) actually envy dictators such as putin and that little Mongoloid whore named she. They wish that they had the "freedom" to impose their dictatorial decrees with absolutely no opposition and that they could imprison and murder every single person who disagrees with them. They are not offended at all by putin's dictatorial ways, and the liberal sheep who follow them are only superficially offended by those dictatorial ways, for, if they truly were against dictatorship, they would be opposed to everything that the demonrats have been doing to them and to the rest of the country for the last 2 years.


Whilst the leftist demonrats in America have chosen to side with Ukraine (because of the scapegoats that doing so provides), the staunch American conservatives on the right, especially those of a very "Christian" persuasion, have chosen to see Ukraine as the "most corrupt nation in the world" and a nation with people under the brutal oppression of neo-Nazis, and they see putin as some sort of masculine hero figure that is coming against the leftists' effeminate "wokeness" and wants to rescue the oppressed minorities in Ukraine from their corrupt oppressors. Why would people, especially Christians, who constantly talk about "freedom", "liberty", and the "rights of 'we the people'" be willing to give a 20-year dictator and a former KGB operative such high praise and support? Even though the answer to this stems from a single, invisible source, the answer in the natural realm stems from several factors. For one, the liberals are claiming to support Ukraine, which automatically means in the conservatives' eyes that putin must be "the good guy". Second, aside from their exposure to a few video clips that show putin as a "shirtless macho man" who is not into the effeminate "state-your-pronoun" agenda of the left, their exposure to putin and his true nature is minimal. They do not know how putin has acted once and again to suppress Christianity in Russia (as documented on in several articles and on They do not know that you can be imprisoned for preaching the Gospel on the streets (because you are only authorised to preach inside a church building). They do not know that preachers have to be careful about what they say from the pulpit because they can be arrested (or made to disappear) if they say things that are too "disrespectful" of putin and his regime. They barely know about the journalists who have had to flee Russia because they dared to criticise putin and who have, at times, been chased down by putin and murdered on foreign soil. And, even if they were exposed to all these realities about putin, these conservative American pandas would be quick to either dismiss them as irrelevant or question them (giving putin a benefit of the doubt that they would never give to hillary clinton or george soros). It is sad how the "Christians" in this American bunch have never truly bothered to ask God what He thinks about putin and to truly discern putin's inner nature. This is especially sad because, unlike Ukraine's Zelensky, putin is not a "new kid on the block" who just surfaced on the world stage. He has been the Russian dictator for 20 years (and, yes, I know about the Medvedev years, but I also know the word "puppet"). American Christians have had 20 years to discern putin spiritually, but they have been too busy criticising liberals and listening to their conservative pundits to truly understand putin or make sense of what is going on now.


Aside from reflexively opposing anything the demonrats say and not discerning putin's evil, there are 2 yet sadder reasons why the American conservative pandas are supporting putin. One of those reasons is nationalistic selfishness. In the old Cold-War days, conservative Americans would support brutal right-wing dictatorships if that is what it took to prevent another "domino" falling to the Soviet Union and Communism. Why? Because the Soviet Union was a threat to America and its way of life, and all efforts had to be made, in their minds, to prevent them becoming too powerful. Even though the opposition to the Soviet Union may have started (in some) as a result of their awareness of how evil Communism is and a sincere desire to save others from its oppression, that opposition eventually became tainted by nationalism, to the point that the freedom of other peoples was overshadowed by "national interests". As long as the ones being (potentially) oppressed were not Americans, the American conservative did not care much about oppression, for the goal was to stop the Soviet Union at all costs. This hideous core of nationalistic selfishness is still in the hearts of most American conservatives, even those who are Christian, which is why they are willing to support a potential dictator such as putin if that is what it takes to stop the evil liberals and their agenda. This "America First" nationalistic selfishness is also at the heart of their constant opposition to any foreign war, including the war in Iraq. Despite their "Christianity", most of these conservative Americans had no concern for the suffering of the Iraqi people under saddam hussein, and they did not hear God's call to take him out. They had no understanding of the fact that, by saving the people of Iraq from hussein, they would be opening a spiritual door of revival in the Middle East that would ultimately bless America, for it would mean the eventual end of the mooslims' jihad against the West (as a side note, this spiritual door of revival is still slightly ajar, but the revival has not "walked in" through that door because of all the spiritual stupidities American Christians have done to block God's revival). Knowing that the God of Israel is reading these words as I am typing them, this writer can say with absolute certainty that, if America had not invaded Iraq and dethroned hussein, America's spiritual calling would be dead by now, as dead as hispanic Latin America's, which died in June of 2003, some 3 months after America's invasion of Iraq. Had America not invaded Iraq in 2003, all hope for America would be lost by now and there would be no reason to hope for any restoration of this nation. God would be long gone from America, and America would be on an inevitable path to destruction and collapse. To be frank, this writer is often unsure as to whether the American calling is dead already, but I can say with certainty that, if America is truly dead, it would have died much more quickly and in a more shameful and inglorious way had it not obeyed God and invaded Iraq. That action (and a few other related actions, too long to describe here) gave it enough "spiritual currency" to survive and at least have a fighting chance after the rise of barack hussein obastard. Ironically, Trump, who stupidly remains opposed to the Iraq war, would have never made it to the White House in 2017 had America not invaded Iraq in 2003.


This writer feels great sorrow when I see adverts on television from organisations requesting donations to help wounded veterans, most of whom were injured in Iraq or Afghanistan. When I see the images of men and women who lost limbs, became paralysed, had their face disfigured, lost their sight, or become emotionally traumatised, I become enraged that there is any need for independent organisations to be created to request funds and help these men and women. How can it be that, after willingly sacrificing so much to serve and protect the wealthiest country of the face of the Earth, they are not treated like royalty, freely receiving everything they could possibly need for the rest of their lives? Instead of lavishinly providing for these men and women, liberal "compassionate" politicians prefer to waste billions of dollars on ridiculous liberal programmes and exorbitant salaries for incompetent and destructive politicians and bureaucrats. Besides this outrage against how the U.S. (liberal) government does not care to honour these men and women, I am also saddened and angered by how Bush 43 put these men through unnecessary danger and suffering by not embracing God's all-out strategy of unabashed conquest, choosing instead to listen to the liberal voices that constantly advised him to one down the attack in order not to look "insensitively aggressive", "imperialistic", "disrespectful of mooslims", or "oil-hungry". Unnecessary as most of the vererans' suffering was, it would be wrong to consider it a wasted sacrifice. As we said above, had America not gone to Iraq and Afghanistan to drive out saddam hussein and the taliban, America would already be spiritually dead. God blesses these men and women for helping to give America 20 extra years and a fighting chance to remain alive before the eyes of God. Even if America ends up dying, these men's sacrifices will still not have been for naught, and they shall be eternally honoured by the God of Israel for what they did, not only for America, but for the Middle East, for they helped to open a spiritual portal there that will never be closed.


{As a parenthesis, as we said 18 years ago, putin established strong economic connections with saddam hussein and was a strong supporter of saddam's tyranny in Iraq, which is why Russia was strongly opposed to any military action against saddam hussein in Iraq then. This reinforces the sad reality that putin's Russia is the current equivalent of saddam's Iraq 20 years ago. Just like they failed 20 years ago when they opposed the war in Iraq, conservatives are failing God now by opposing resistance to putin's aggression. Cursed is anyone (including Trump) who opposes the war in Iraq 20 years ago and cursed is anyone who defends putin against Ukraine today.}


A fourth sad reason why the American conservative pandas are willing to support putin's assault on Ukraine is the reason most strongly linked to the spiritual source of all these reasons. That fourth reason is the obsession with the "New World Order" and the "Great Reset". Even though there is much reality and truth to these concepts, they are taken by the Hittite spirit of Korah deception and used to manipulate the hearts and minds of conservatives. The allure of these concepts is overwhelming and irresistible to conservatives, for, as we said earlier, it allows them to rationalise all the degradation America is experiencing and to distance themselves and the Founding Fathers from it. Besides that, it provides for entertaining soap opera and gives them a sense of comfort that they do know what is going on and are not utterly clueless about what is going wrong (which they actually are).


"3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." (2 Timothy 4:3-4)


Because of this obsession with the "Great Reset" and the "New World Order", satan was able to easily dupe American conservatives into thinking that the conflict in Ukraine was orchestrated and that Zelensky (the Ukrainian President) is "in" on the conspiracy and is making every effort not to let the conflict subside because it will then lead to another major crisis that will empower the grand architects of the "Great Reset" to steal more freedoms and gain greater control of the people. For example, when a Ukrainian female member of parliament decided to take up arms to protect her country and said to a reporter something akin to "putin must recognise that there is a new world order and I am here to protect that new order", the American conservative pandas dropped their bamboo stalks for a second, stood up, and shouted "Aha!!" in unison, rejoicing over the fact that they had been proved "right". However, what these American idiots do not understand is that that woman was speaking from the perspective of an Eastern European, i.e. a human being who knows all too well about the 45 years of brutal oppression imposed on Eastern Europe by a vicious Russian regime at a time when the "world order" revolved around the Cold War conflict between Russia and the West. Since Americans, both conservative and liberal, tend to have little awareness of what happens outside the United States, most Americans have no real understanding of what it meant to the people of Eastern Europe to see the Berlin Wall go down in 1989 and to see the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s after it seemed to everyone (including this writer) that the Cold War "order of things" was destined to last forever and ever. To the Eastern European, the "new world order" is the order that came into being after the Soviet Union collapsed, an order in which they were now free from the Russian yoke and could live under democracy and unfettered access to the West and the rest of the world. The Eastern European does not want to return to the days of Russian oppression where their lives are controlled from Moscow. They do not want to return to that hell, to that "old order", and are willing to fight to preserve the current "new world order". The self-centred, non-empathising American conservative panda is not aware of any of this and can only argue that this is all part of a great conspiracy if worthless bastards such as george soros support Ukraine and oppose Russia, but they seem to forget that, evil and hell-bound as george soros is, he is a Hungarian, an Eastern European, and he would not want Russia oppressing Eastern Europe again. Even so, soros' reason for rejecting that oppression is not because he loves freedom per se but because he wants the freedom to continue carrying out his freedom-encroaching shenanigans and does not want to have to compete with or give an account to putin whilst doing his evil deeds (in the same way that the national-socialist Hitler fought with Russia, not because he despised socialism but because he, being a German socialist, did not want to be subservient to a socialist movement whose headquarters was in Russian Moscow, not German Berlin).


Just to continue baiting the American conservative pandas into supporting putin even more, the spirit that speaks through the senile bastard (who frequently shuffles his soiled feet around the White House at the time of this writing) recently said something akin to "We are fighting for the new world order here" (in reference to Ukraine), which prompted the American conservative pandas to yet again drop their bamboo stalks and shout "Aha!! The senile one had a senior moment and blurted out the secret plan". Dear reader, you must remember that the senile bastard is a shell of a "human being". He is an empty vessel who is being artificially kept alive by the fuel of America's collective stupidity (on the right and the left). When he made that statement, he was probably referring to the "Cold-War" vs. "post-Cold-War" contrast described above, but satan made sure to make him word it in such a way that it would scratch the itch of the conservative pandas' ears, entrenching them further in their Hittite Korah deception. As a result, the American conservative pandas are failing this "20-year do-over" of the Iraq war test, and they are failing it in a more massive way than they did 20 years ago. They are actively supporting and praising a ruthless and despicable dictator who wants to return Europe to the way it was 40 years ago, a Europe divided into a capitalistic West and a communistic East manipulated and devoured by the Russian bear (which is definitely no panda bear).


Word against Magog

Having said all of the above, it is worth emphasising that God is not calling America to send literal ground troops into Ukraine the way that He did 20 years ago with Iraq. The reason for this is that the circumstances are very different now. For one, they would be fighting under the "leadership" of a hell-bound son of a whore (i.e. son of Jezebel), a senile bastard that has no clue what to say or do unless it is spelled out to him by his handlers. If the American military had enough moral character and a sense of duty that transcended the traditional patriotic conservative's, soldiers and generals would have been leaving in droves, not only because they were now serving under a mentally unfit election thief but because they were being mandated to take the poisonous mRNA gene-therapy injections. Any concerns about leaving the nation unprotected would have been assuaged by an awareness that, if they did the right thing, the God of Israel would take care of the consequences. The current impostors in power are already undermining the nation's safety anyway as they allow it to be overrun by hundreds and hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens currently crossing the border at a mad clip. They are destroying the economy from within by sabotaging domestic energy production and overspending by trillions of dollars year after year. They have such little respect for the military that they would be willing to send soldiers on suicide missions if they could use it as a political distraction from their domestic destruction. If the military had the character to resign en masse, they would force the nation to perceive how vulnerable and close-to-death America is becoming at the hands of liberalism. Under such a mass resignation, there would be no one to send to Ukraine. Hence, we can safely conclude that the Lord God of Israel does not want American troops on the ground in Ukraine, for He does not even want them on the ground in America!!! What, then, does the Lord want America to do?


Basically, what the Lord is requiring is the sending of "resources" to help Ukraine in its fight to prevent being the first of many dominos to fall to putin. Those "resources" can take many forms, and they vary from person to person. This writer believes that, for the sincere remnant believer, the "resources" entail a stand of support for the people of Ukraine, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and the rest of Eastern Europe in their effort to prevent a return to the days of Eastern-bloc slavery. With a deep awareness of the sorrow and darkness of those days, the remnant believer is to release fervent prayers into the spiritual atmosphere to help Ukraine and the rest of Eastern Europe to remain free, regardless of all the confusing white noise that the Korah spirit of deception may make (from both the liberal-panda and the conservative-panda sides). In other words, the remnant believer must look at Eastern Europe through green-horse eyes, longing for the days when the Glory of God will flow through it like a River, and knowing that those days will not come (or will be greatly harmed and delayed) if the Russian bear is allowed to rise again. The current political and ideological whirlwinds swirling around the whole matter are completely irrelevant and immaterial and are the product of things that are already dead and soon shall no longer be. God has a longer-term, eternal plan in mind, and this is what the remnant believer is to have in his mind as well as he sends fervent prayers to help Ukraine fight Magog.


"1 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, 2 Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, and prophesy against him, 3 And say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal: 4 And I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws, and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armour, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords: 5 Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet: 6 Gomer, and all his bands; the house of Togarmah of the north quarters, and all his bands: and many people with thee. 7 Be thou prepared, and prepare for thyself, thou, and all thy company that are assembled unto thee, and be thou a guard unto them. 8 After many days thou shalt be visited: in the latter years thou shalt come into the land that is brought back from the sword, and is gathered out of many people, against the mountains of Israel, which have been always waste: but it is brought forth out of the nations, and they shall dwell safely all of them. 9 Thou shalt ascend and come like a storm, thou shalt be like a cloud to cover the land, thou, and all thy bands, and many people with thee. 10 Thus saith the Lord GOD; It shall also come to pass, that at the same time shall things come into thy mind, and thou shalt think an evil thought: 11 And thou shalt say, I will go up to the land of unwalled villages; I will go to them that are at rest, that dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates, 12 To take a spoil, and to take a prey; to turn thine hand upon the desolate places that are now inhabited, and upon the people that are gathered out of the nations, which have gotten cattle and goods, that dwell in the midst of the land. 13 Sheba, and Dedan, and the merchants of Tarshish, with all the young lions thereof, shall say unto thee, Art thou come to take a spoil? hast thou gathered thy company to take a prey? to carry away silver and gold, to take away cattle and goods, to take a great spoil? 14 Therefore, son of man, prophesy and say unto Gog, Thus saith the Lord GOD; In that day when my people of Israel dwelleth safely, shalt thou not know it? 15 And thou shalt come from thy place out of the north parts, thou, and many people with thee, all of them riding upon horses, a great company, and a mighty army: 16 And thou shalt come up against my people of Israel, as a cloud to cover the land; it shall be in the latter days, and I will bring thee against my land, that the heathen may know me, when I shall be sanctified in thee, O Gog, before their eyes. 17 Thus saith the Lord GOD; Art thou he of whom I have spoken in old time by my servants the prophets of Israel, which prophesied in those days many years that I would bring thee against them? 18 And it shall come to pass at the same time when Gog shall come against the land of Israel, saith the Lord GOD, that my fury shall come up in my face. 19 For in my jealousy and in the fire of my wrath have I spoken, Surely in that day there shall be a great shaking in the land of Israel; 20 So that the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the heaven, and the beasts of the field, and all creeping things that creep upon the earth, and all the men that are upon the face of the earth, shall shake at my presence, and the mountains shall be thrown down, and the steep places shall fall, and every wall shall fall to the ground. 21 And I will call for a sword against him throughout all my mountains, saith the Lord GOD: every man's sword shall be against his brother. 22 And I will plead against him with pestilence and with blood; and I will rain upon him, and upon his bands, and upon the many people that are with him, an overflowing rain, and great hailstones, fire, and brimstone. 23 Thus will I magnify myself, and sanctify myself; and I will be known in the eyes of many nations, and they shall know that I am the LORD." (Ezekiel 38:1-23)


Some believers may be quick to react to the above passage by saying, "Sorry, dude, but you seem to have little understanding of Biblical prophecy. The above is a prophecy about the future invasion of Israel by Russia, so you are deceiving yourself by applying it to the invasion of Ukraine.". However, to interpret the above passage in a literal way and to interpret it in the context of the Church's traditional eschatology is equivalent to reacting to the sound of human words with pig oinks and dog barks. As some of you may know, we have spent significant time posting articles and videos related to Matthew 24 in an effort to show how the Church's traditional eschatology is so brutally inconsistent with what God says in Scripture. Therefore, we can safely conclude that any interpretation (of any passage) that is espoused by the Church's eschatologists should always be seen with immense scepticism. Also, we must remember something that the Church's Girgashite eschatologists do not understand: that God's rhema word is alive and dynamic, not inert and static, which means that the same prophecy can manifest itself in multiple ways and in multiple circumstances, for it is triggered by spiritual principles and forces, not by fixed historical facts. Hence, the above word can potentially be relevant to multiple events, even if the eschatological parrots are right in expecting Russia to someday invade Israel (which I personally believe God will never allow, just to shame the eschatologists who have ignorantly and unwittingly desecrated His Holy word for decades). The question then remains, Does the passage above truly apply to Ukraine?


To answer that question, we must consider several factors. First, as you may already know, the ancient nation of Magog was centred in present-day Russia, and all Russians (and Slavs in general) are descendants of Magog, son of Japheth. Second, as some of you may know, Ukraine is strongly connected to the Holocaust during World War II. As explained on, historians believe that the Holocaust is "integrally connected" to the Germans' attempt to conquer and retain Ukraine. Between 1 and 1-and-a-half million Jews are believed to have been massacred in Ukraine during the war. Examples of this were the Nikolaev massacre in the southern Ukrainian city of Mykolaiv, where 35,000 Jews were killed in just 15 days, and the Babi Yar ravine massacre outside of Kyiv, where close to 34,000 Jews were killed in 2 days. Considering that around 6 million Jews were massacred during the Holocaust, the fact that around a quarter of them may have been killed within Ukraine, a country so far away from Hitler's Berlin, emphasises the "Jewish relevance" of Ukraine.


A third factor to consider is the fact that the current President of Ukraine, Volodymir Zelensky is a Jew, born the year prior to the Russian invasion of Afghanistan to Jewish parents whilst Ukraine was still under Soviet domination (which exposes the immense stupidity of the conservatives that believe that Ukraine is run by Nazis). Zelensky's connection to Israel goes beyond being born into a Jewish family. For one, as described on, Zelensky's great-grandparents and 3 granduncles were massacred in the Holocaust. Second, at the age of 16 (around the year 1994), Zelensky passed the TOEFL exam and received a grant to study in Israel, but did not go because his father did not authorise it. Third, when he became President of Ukraine on 20 May 2019 (after a very peculiar life path that was in no way political), Ukraine became the first country on Earth other than Israel to have a Jewish head of state and head of government (at least since the rebirth of Israel in 1948). All of this emphasises the spiritual connection that the God of Israel sees between Ukraine and Israel.


Thus, when putin decided to invade Ukraine, it was the spiritual equivalent of the Germans marching into Ukraine to massacre Jews. Pathetic vladimir thought that his troops would have a cakewalk through Ukraine, razing it as they "massacred" the Jew Zelensky and his government. However, just as is described in Ezekiel 38 above, things turned out to be much more difficult than he expected. Poor vladimir thought that the former actor/comedian and "amateur politician" Volodymir would fold like a tent and flee for his life, leaving Ukraine to fend for itself under the trampling paws of the Russian bear. However, the young and apparently mild 44-year-old Zelensky (who, ironically, grew up a Russian speaker) proved to have much greater mettle than putin had expected, returning fire with fire and aggressiveness with aggressiveness.


To be frank, this writer must share that I had absolutely no awareness of Zelensky until the Russians began their threats against Ukraine earlier this year (2022). When I began to notice him, however, I perceived something in him. Even though he is far from being "perfect" and has several flaws, I could perceive a Spirit-of-Philadelphia anointing on him. The idiotic portrayals of him (by the conservative pandas) as a ruthless thug conspiring with the "New World Order elite" did not make any sense in my spirit. On the contrary, I saw in him a Philadelphia dreamer, a man enveloped in weakness who was willing to dream of great things, and a man convinced that he could take down Goliaths with his slingshot. Therefore, I was not surprised to learn later that, during 3 seasons between 2015 and 2019, Zelensky starred on a Ukrainian television show named "Servant of the People", where he played the role of a high-school history teacher who unexpectedly became President of Ukraine after a student filmed a viral video of him ranting against government corruption in Ukraine. As indicated on, the show was created and produced by Zelensky, meaning that he was conceiving "impossible" dreams in his heart and was willing to follow them when the opportunity arose. This connection between Zelensky and the Spirit of Philadelphia points to 2 things. First, it points to the Spirit-of-Philadelphia potential that is silently present in Eastern Europe (especially in the nearby Baltic states). Second, it points to Ezekiel 38 and "little Israel" achieving the impossible by overcoming the overwhelmingly large Magog.


Zelensky also exudes a strong spirit of anti-elitism. This was evident from the beginning to this writer due to Zelensky's apparent insistence on appearing on television wearing a T-shirt. An elitist politician would never wear a T-shirt, especially if he knew that the whole world was watching him. An elitist would probably want to appear in military attire (like the currently-burning-in-hell fidel castro) or wear elegant and expensive attire to look powerful and distinguished (like Canada's little whore justine turd-eau). Also, the fact that he named his television show "The servant of the people" indicates an inner awareness in him that he is there to serve rather than to be served (can you imagine Hitler, Stalin, or even the pathetic senile buffoon in the White House at the time of this writing ever referring to themselves as "a servant"?). Also, in his television show, Zelensky included a character (named "Yuriy Ivanovich Chuiko") that portrayed a corrupt politician that is eventually exposed as "an ally of the oligarchs". Can you imagine a person who is an ally of the "hidden New World elite" (as the conservative pandas say he is) including a character in his television show that could actually cause people to see a parallel between that corrupt character and him? Said another way, would anyone with any sense want to draw any attention to something nefarious he was trying to get away with behind the scenes? All of this emphasises that, in his heart, Zelensky has a strong rejection of elitism and is inclined to fight against it. This attitude is especially important when facing a giant Goliath that seems "invincible" to the natural eye.


"1 Therefore, thou son of man, prophesy against Gog, and say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal: 2 And I will turn thee back, and leave but the sixth part of thee, and will cause thee to come up from the north parts, and will bring thee upon the mountains of Israel: 3 And I will smite thy bow out of thy left hand, and will cause thine arrows to fall out of thy right hand. 4 Thou shalt fall upon the mountains of Israel, thou, and all thy bands, and the people that is with thee: I will give thee unto the ravenous birds of every sort, and to the beasts of the field to be devoured. 5 Thou shalt fall upon the open field: for I have spoken it, saith the Lord GOD. 6 And I will send a fire on Magog, and among them that dwell carelessly in the isles: and they shall know that I am the LORD. 7 So will I make my holy name known in the midst of my people Israel; and I will not let them pollute my holy name any more: and the heathen shall know that I am the LORD, the Holy One in Israel. 8 Behold, it is come, and it is done, saith the Lord GOD; this is the day whereof I have spoken. 9 And they that dwell in the cities of Israel shall go forth, and shall set on fire and burn the weapons, both the shields and the bucklers, the bows and the arrows, and the handstaves, and the spears, and they shall burn them with fire seven years: 10 So that they shall take no wood out of the field, neither cut down any out of the forests; for they shall burn the weapons with fire: and they shall spoil those that spoiled them, and rob those that robbed them, saith the Lord GOD. 11 And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will give unto Gog a place there of graves in Israel, the valley of the passengers on the east of the sea: and it shall stop the noses of the passengers: and there shall they bury Gog and all his multitude: and they shall call it The valley of Hamongog. 12 And seven months shall the house of Israel be burying of them, that they may cleanse the land. 13 Yea, all the people of the land shall bury them; and it shall be to them a renown the day that I shall be glorified, saith the Lord GOD." (Ezekiel 39:1-13)


The remnant shiboleth

Dear reader, this writer needs to be very blunt with you, and, if you are offended by what you are about to read, so be it, for you need to be told this since you will be held accountable for it before the God of Israel, regardless of whether you choose to hear it or not. Just like the saddam hussein dictator test of 20 years ago, this putin dictator test is a shiboleth that determines whether you are a remnant believer or not. If you believe that the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was not the right thing to do, you cannot be a true, green-horse remnant believer, regardless of how much you sympathise with the remnant or their ideas. If you support the takeover of Ukraine by putin, you are not a true remnant believer either, and you will definitely not enter the Promised Land (i.e. eternal life, which is not the same as "escaping hell"). Mind you, opposing saddam and putin does not, in and of itself, guarantee that you will enter into eternal life, but, if you do not, there is no chance (in heaven or hell) that God will allow you to enter into eternal life. Why? Because this test reveals what is in your heart. It reveals whether you have a longing for the freedom of God's latter rain. It reveals whether you truly understand what the "New Covenant world order" is all about. It reveals whether you truly have Philadelphia love for your brother. It reveals whether you long to see the glory of God filling the nations of the Earth (as opposed to just your local church or country). It reveals whether you understand the fractal nature of God or are instead trapped in a simplistic world where you measure the truth of someone's statement based on the ideological labels you previously placed on him (as opposed to knowing that even an ass can speak the truth and that even a broken clock is right twice a day).


If the above sounds so wrong and offends you so much that you will no longer visit this website, this writer shall wave goodbye to you with sadness, but, as I wave, I will know that we were really never of the same spirit and you never truly grasped the essence of this website's purpose. If you are actually correct in finding the above to be wrong, then we can basically conclude that this website is, at its core, a website full of falsehood. Why stay here and eat fruit of this poisoned tree? It is better for you to leave and find yourself a better tree to eat from. Just to make it easier for you, do know that this writer is convinced that this is the most important Bible-study website on the face of the Earth and that no other website even comes close to revealing God's latter-day message for the Earth (at least with a similar level of comprehensive detail). Simple, low-traffic, and "irrelevant" as this website may be, it is the most important event in the history of Christianity since Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses on that Wittenberg church door over 500 years ago. The God of Israel has deposited enough of His revealed truth on this website to revolutionise the entire human experience and propel mankind into the New World Order that He has envisioned and prophesied, yet the Christian Church continues to go into the forest in search of more bamboo sticks to chew on, waiting for things to magically end somehow. I hope that these "deranged" statements will eliminate any lingering doubts you may have about abandoning this website if you are uneasy about what is being written in this posting and in this paragraph.


"53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. 54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. 55 For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. 56 He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him. 57 As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me. 58 This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever. 59 These things said he in the synagogue, as he taught in Capernaum. 60 Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it? 61 When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you? 62 What and if ye shall see the son of man ascend up where he was before? 63 It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life. 64 But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him. 65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. 66 From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him. 67 Then said Jesus unto the twelve, Will ye also go away? 68 Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life." (John 6:53-68)


As you may have hopefully realised by now, this writer has never attempted to sell himself on this website, for the intent has always been to put God's truth in the forefront and allow His truth to prevail in believers' hearts. This is part of why this writer almost never mentions his name throughout the website's content. Sometimes, when I am stricken with grief, I wonder if I am part of God's remnant myself, but, regardless of whether I am or not, the words on this website are remnant words and they are true. And, even if I have been nothing more than a stupid dictation machine that God has used to materialise His thoughts on the Earth, the legitimacy of the thoughts stands, and this entire generation of humanity will be judged by their reaction and interest (or lack thereof) in these words. May he who has ears hear what the Lord God of Israel is saying.


In short, the situation in Ukraine at the time of this writing is a spiritual "repeat" of the Iraq situation 20 years ago. Back then, America had to decide whether to support a weak people (the Iraqi people) living under the threat of an abusive dictator that seemed impossible to defeat (saddam hussein). Now, America has to decide whether to support a weak people (the Ukrainian people and Zelensky) living under the threat of an abusive dictator that seems overwhelmingly large (i.e. vladimir putin and a "new-and-improved" version of the Soviet Union). Unfortunately, America's reaction is even worse now than it was 20 years ago. On the one hand, we have the spiritually empty support of Ukraine by naive liberals who would support a cucumber if their elitist leaders told them to, liberals who would not recognise dictatorship and tyranny if it hit them in the face (literally, as the "masques" show) and who therefore have no clue why the people of Eastern Europe are so angry and concerned about what putin is trying to revive. On the other hand, we have spiritually paranoid conservatives who will automatically believe the opposite of what liberals say and who see a well-coordinated literal conspiracy in everything; being so earthly and non-spiritual, these conservatives fail to understand that what drives some of the "conspiracies" they see are spiritual forces operating through sometimes unwitting people, forces that are still active on Earth because they (the conservatives) refuse to shed the Old-Covenant, matriarchal past and embrace the spiritual New World Order that God is demanding they surrender to. To these paranoid conservative pandas, anything "new" is to be distrusted, even if it is a new thing from God.


"How long wilt thou go about, O thou backsliding daughter? for the LORD hath created a new thing in the earth, A woman shall compass a man." (Jeremiah 31:22)

[In this context, a "woman" refers to someone weak to the natural eye and a "man" refers to someone strong and powerful to the natural eye. The conservative Church, contaminated by elitism, believes in following those who are visibly "strong" and "well-known", disdaining the "weak" and "unrecognised" small remnant. Yet, the remnant are the ones who are appointed by God to take the Church and the world to the Promised Land, whether the Church wants to accept it or not.]


Black-and-white versus colour

For reasons that are too long to detail here, this writer did not have the chance to have a colour television set at home until the year 1988. I remember how I would always envy other people when I would be at their homes and see a baseball game or a regular show being displayed on their colour sets. I would always admire how "alive" the game or show looked on those sets, and I would always contrast it with the bland view I would get at home on our black-and-white set. This is part of why I appreciate the difference of seeing the world in colour versus seeing it in black-and-white. The fact that pandas are black-and-white points to this spiritual reality.


Because they are stuck in the black-horse stage, spiritual pandas can only discern the world in black and white. They marry into an ideology, into a pattern of thinking that proceeds to apply labels to all persons and things. After an evaluation of each person or thing, the ideology places a label on it as either "good" or "bad", and every subsequent action or event related to that person or thing is judged based on that label, meaning that all actions or events related to it automatically inherit its label. For example, if hillary clinton is labelled as "evil", everything that comes out of her mouth is automatically labelled as "evil". If Trump is labelled as "good", then everything that he says or does is automatically "good", and, when it is clear that it is not "good", the black-and-white panda is forced to produce an explanation (inspired by the Hittite spirit of Korah deception) to rationalise why the label "good" still applies, as when they would say,

"Trump is playing 3-D chess. He is toying with them, running a Statue-of-Liberty play to defeat them at the end. We don't see it because Trump is just too bright for us. What he just did is definitely good, even though it seems like a bad thing to our untrained eyes!!"


This black-and-white labelling is not limited to conservative pandas. Liberal pandas are constantly checking for the label on a person before deciding whether that person's actions are "good" or "bad". For example, when Trump was still in the White House and was idiotically promoting and enabling the mRNA gene-therapy shots, liberals interviewed on the streets about the shots would say something like "I don't know. It all sounds very experimental and rushed to me. I am not sure I can really put my body at risk by subjecting it to those shots.". Once the senile bastard was handed the election and the demonrats finally started their full-blown campaign to promote the shots (which they had held back from doing until after the stolen election), the same liberal pandas who had once been hesitant about the "experimental" and "rushed" shots suddenly became enthusiastic about them and became quickly offended at anyone who would dare to question the sanity of taking them.


The above explains why it is impossible to placate black-and-white pandas from both sides, especially the ones on the left. When Ronald Reagan (who had a "Bad" label on him in the liberal pandas' eyes) nominated the first woman to the Supreme Court, Sandra Day O'Connor, the liberal pandas simply said, "Reagan is a male chauvinist. He is just doing this to pretend that he is not. He wants to throw us off his scent in order to continue with his male chauvinist agenda behind the scenes.". When the Republican Bush 41 (who also had a "Bad" label on him by virtue of being a Republican and Reagan's V.P. for 8 years) nominated the 2nd black American to the Supreme Court, the Georgian Clarence Thomas, the liberal pandas simply said, "Republicans are racist, so Clarence Thomas must be some sort of Uncle Tom who is being put there to say, 'Yes, massa', to everything the Republicans tell him to do. Clarence Thomas is not really black, and he must be some sort of deviant over-sexed male chauvinist ape if he is working for those chauvinist Republicans.". No matter what Republicans do to show the demonrats that they are really not "monsters", they can never gain the liberal pandas' appreciation because the "Bad" label is glued to them for life, for it is an a priori label placed on them by the ideology that liberals worship and not by the person's core actions. It is important to note, that, in the American landscape, the liberal panda has been roaming about for much, much longer and in much greater numbers than the conservative panda, but the American Church has degraded so quickly (due to its stubborn refusal to obey God's orders to move towards the green-horse light) that the conservative panda population has caught up to their liberal counterparts, and America is now experiencing a full blown "pandamic" where almost everyone seems to be an idiotic black-and-white panda with no ability to go "green(-horse)".


As we have shared before, green-horse riders understand the "fractal" nature of God and His Truth, meaning that they understand that Truth is inherently complex and multi-layered. As a result, they understand that reality is comprised of many colours and hues and cannot be simplistically reduced to a couple of colours. Green-horse riders are spiritually sensitive to colours, which is why their hearts are stirred to a deep longing for God's latter-rain Glory when they see its subtle green hues waving like the Aurora Borealis in the horizon. Unlike the black-and-white panda that can hope for nothing more than an "improved" version of the current black-and-white human condition, the green-horse rider sees God's transcendental vision of humanity, a vivid vision abounding with all the colours in the spectrum.


Shortly after typing the paragraph above, the Lord led me to learn (without me looking for it) that the predominant colour in the Aurora Borealis tends to be green, as indicated on and as can be seen in the following photos from the Wikipedia article on Auroras:

Aurora images
Images of auroras from around the world, assembled by Wikipedia user 14jbella from various authors listed on this page (reduced to 25%)


Because of their understanding of the multi-coloured nature of God's reality, green-horse riders know that people and things cannot be simplistically separated into "black" and "white" and that, on many occasions, a person or a situation will contain a complex mixture of colours that must be discerned on an individual basis. This is why green-horse riders are not easily swayed by the Korah deceptions that the stuck-in-black pandas are so susceptible to.


As a parenthesis, the Lord told me to look up the meaning of the surname Zelensky, and, when I did, it became clear why. According to, Zelensky is derived from a word meaning "green". Thus, it is no coincidence that Zelensky's Ukraine is being used by the Lord to distinguish between the stuck-in-black-horse believers and God's green-horse riders. The pandas who perceive things in black and white will only see Zelensky as a dark shade of grey, without recognising the "greenness" in him. The sad thing is that, even if they could perceive that greenness, they would not be drawn to it, for they do not understand it or care for it.


Felix the panda

As indicated on, the Chinese name for the panda bear is 大熊猫 (pronounced dà-xióng-mao), which literally means big () bear () cat (). Notice that the name denotes the panda bear as a type of cat, possibly because the Chinese saw "cat-like" qualities in the panda's behaviour. This is no spiritual coincidence. As we have briefly shared before, the "cat" is, in a negative sense, related to the Hivite spirit. As we have shared before, the Hivite spirit leads people to behave like "spoiled rich kids" who feel that the world was created to circle around them and serve their interests. This turn Hivites into very sedentary people who constantly wait to be waited on. This corresponds with how pandas avoid the normal bear behaviour of going out to search for and hunt down prey, "choosing" instead (in a manner of speaking) to live in regions abounding in "immobile" bamboo stalks where they can simply sit down and munch (and munch, and munch, and munch) on the stalks around them until they have ingested enough energy to subsist for another day. Thus, they behave like "fat cats" that have inherited a large "bamboo plantation" and can simply live off of it without exerting themselves too much.


Hence, we can infer from the above that pandas will abound in an atmosphere that is very receptive to the Hivite spirit. This explains why so many people were happy at the start of the pandamic to stay at home, not work, and simply wait for their government "lockdown-relief cheques". In a wider sense, the Hivite connection also explains why so many otherwise intelligent and well-educated people were simply waiting for the next set of "guidelines" from government agencies to know how to "properly react" to the virus. Instead of "hunting down" the necessary information and using their common sense to distinguish between what is scientifically correct and what is superstitious hysteria, the Hivite pandas simply sat down to digest the poisonous stalks that their beloved, officially-sanctioned "experts" fed them day after day.


Hivites come to believe that there is nothing more to life than the state they have achieved. It is as if their current state is "idyllic" and "heavenly" to them, for which reason they see no need to make an effort to forge a better state of things. They may occasionally engage in tricky Hivite "wheeling and dealing" to prolong their "idyllic" state when they see it threatened by circumstances, but, other than that, they would just as well do nothing but passively enjoy their "inheritance".


Even though what we said above may seem to insinuate that the Hivite element is present in liberal pandas only, the Hivite component is also tragically present in conservative pandas, only in a subtler way. American conservative pandas believe that they have been given the "perfect form of government" in what the Founding Fathers left behind. They are proud of that inheritance, that "heritage", and they feel that it does not need to be "tampered with" in any fundamental way. To these conservative pandas, the America of the Founding Fathers was the "idyllic" nation-state, a heavenly country, a "New Jerusalem" descending from above that has been ruined by those "wascally" evil liberals. All that these pandas want, therefore, is for the liberals to be defeated so that they can sit back down and once again enjoy the Founding-Father bamboo stalks that grow effortlessly from the American soil. This does not mean that the conservative pandas do not believe in working hard and producing new goods and services. It means that, when it comes to America as a system, no additional work or effort is necessary. Whatever the Founding Fathers came up with was "perfection", and they are too lazy (and proud) to ever place the Founding Fathers or the American system under the telescope of scrutiny to see where we may have possibly gone wrong. Thus, the overt Hivite behaviour in liberal pandas that conservative pandas despise so much is actually a consequence of their own unwitting embrace of Hivite attitudes through wilful inaction. I must say that, with each passing day, my heart grows heavier and heavier with sadness at how defiantly stupid the American conservative panda is. I could not care less about the liberal pandas. They are for the most part hopeless, and they can go to Hell for all I care because that is what they want; and, the longer they linger on Earth, the more people they will drag to Hell with them, so it is actually better for humanity that they just die off and go to Hell as soon as possible. My concern is with the conservative pandas. They are the ones who decide whether America will live or die, and they continue to choose death over and over again, for they would rather die than take down their altars to the Founding Fathers and the worthless Constitution that they revere so. They would also rather die than denounce and renounce the matriarchal system in the American Church. They would rather die than recognise that traditional American Christianity is an abomination to the True God of Israel and that God is calling them to tear down the current system and embrace His. This writer has been writing for 18 years on this website, and, despite the incalculable spiritual effect that these writings have had on America's spiritual atmosphere, the American Church and its mass of stubborn consecutive pandas refuse to look up to Heaven and budge. As we said earlier, all that it took in 1517 was for Martin Luther to do "one post" (when he nailed his 95 theses to that Church door), and the world responded to God with a fiery zeal. This writer has posted hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of postings (in written, visual, and audio form), and America continues to either stand still or wilfully slide back even further. How much longer will I have to be burdened with sadness before I wake up one morning to the realisation that America, as a nation, is forever dead in the eyes of God and will never come back to life?


""22 And when Felix heard these things, having more perfect knowledge of that way, he deferred them, and said, When Lysias the chief captain shall come down, I will know the uttermost of your matter. 23 And he commanded a centurion to keep Paul, and to let him have liberty, and that he should forbid none of his acquaintance to minister or come unto him. 24 And after certain days, when Felix came with his wife Drusilla, which was a Jewess, he sent for Paul, and heard him concerning the faith in Christ. 25 And as he reasoned of righteousness, temperance, and judgment to come, Felix trembled, and answered, Go thy way for this time; when I have a convenient season, I will call for thee." (Acts 24:22-25)"


As we have shared before, the name "Felix" literally means "happy", meaning that Felix was happy to remain in his fallen state. Despite the opportunity of having Paul before him to imbue him with a new wisdom from God Himself that had never been uttered before, Felix remained uninterested and chose to continue in his passive state of "happiness". So it is with the conservative and liberal pandas who believe that they have achieved the "Nirvana" of human understanding, convinced that they simply need to sit down and chow down on the (non-nutritious) bamboo stalks that grow in their "Nirvana" garden until the end of their lives. Anything more substantive is irrelevant and unnecessary to them, especially since they are convinced that they do not have the ability or time to digest it. Just like the panda bear, who has the digestive system of any voracious bear, they act like dainty herbivores, going through life without exercising the fullness of their humanity.


The non-(re)productive panda

As indicated on, the giant panda is not very adept at reproducing itself. Not only is their tendency to reproduce minimal in captivity, it is also limited in the wild. Their normal reproduction rate is estimated at only 1 young every 2 years, which is inferior, say, to the American black bear's rate of 2 to 3 cubs every 2 years (as indicated on Whereas the American black bear has been known to have up to 6 cubs at a time, the giant panda can only have up to 2 cubs at a time (which happens in around half of its pregnancies), but, even when it has 2 cubs, only 1 of them tends to survive because the mother generally selects one of the cubs and lets the other one starve to death. It is believed that this happens because the mother is unable to produce enough milk for both, given that she does not store fat (due to her vegetarian diet).


The above correlates with how spiritual pandas become unable to reproduce God's nature on Earth. They become sterilised by their limiting ideology, an ideology that they willingly embrace without an awareness of how it destroys their spiritual future and potential. This also correlates with how the mRNA gene-therapy shots that the liberal pandas have so idiotically surrendered to are known to cause miscarriages and alterations in women's menstrual cycles. As indicated on, studies have shown that 90% of pregnant women injected with the mRNA gene-therapy shots (which the misinformation promoters label as "vaccines") have miscarriages in the first 13 weeks and 80% miscarry in the first 20 weeks. People on the field (at hospitals) have reported an unusual increase in the rate of miscarriages that they have had to deal with since the panda-injection craze started. Yes, if you do an Internet search on the subject, you will find "fact-checking" article after article claiming that the connection between miscarriages and the injection are "unsubstantiated", but these "fact-checkers" are the same ones that supported the WHO's initial claims that the WuHan Flu virus would have a 3% mortality rate. They are the same "fact checkers" that discredited Hydroxychloroquine's ability to act as a cheap and reliable treatment for the WuHan Flu by using a study published in the Lancet medical journal that was eventually proved to be deeply flawed following peer reviews (and was silently retracted by Lancet). They are the same "fact checkers" that claimed that masks and lockdowns were effective against the WuHan Flu, when the data over time from different geographical regions (e.g. Florida vs. New York or Denmark vs. Canada) has clearly shown that masks and lockdowns have made no difference on the virus and that they have, in fact, created a slew of secondary problems. They are the same "fact checkers" who refuse to fact-check the overwhelming success of Ivermectin in every part of the world where it has been adopted (e.g. Indonesia and several provinces in India), choosing instead to "fact-check" Ivermectin as nothing more than a "horse de-wormer". These "fact checkers" have been able to get away with murder (literally and figuratively) because the liberal pandas are too lazy to put down their ideological bamboo stalks, get off of their butts, and think and scrutinise for themselves.


As a parenthesis, even left-leaning Reuters has had to admit in a recent article that the European Union is investigating reports of heavy menstrual bleeding and absence of menstruation in women after receiving mRNA gene-therapy shots. Mind you, the Reuters article makes every effort to create reasonable doubt in the linkage between these shots and the damage to women's reproductive abilities, but only a liberal bamboo-eating panda would swallow that stalk whole and allow himself to be bamboozled by it.


It is worth emphasising that the "reproductive issues" are not limited to liberal pandas. Conservative pandas are also spiritually sterile. They are unable to produce new ideas to solve the problems that the liberals have caused, mainly because any such new ideas would require them exposing the flaws of the Founding Fathers and their now-worthless U.S. Constitution. In other words, their idolatry of the past and their sinful pride of an American Republic that died some 14 years ago has made them mentally and spiritually sterile, incapable of producing anything that will effectively end the liberals' destruction and restore the American nation to its true calling and purpose.


The giant panda and the West

Skinned pandas

According to, even though a Westerner did not see a panda until the German zoologist Hugo Weigold did so in 1916, the giant panda first became known to the Western world for the first time on 11 March 1869, when a French Lazarist missionary named Armand David received a panda skin from a hunter. This points to how the panda is intended to represent a soul that is hunted down and "skinned" by others, especially in an environment of black-horse stagnation, given that people spiritually migrate "west" during the black-horse stage. It is also interesting that the lockdowns in America began between 14 and 20 March 2020, almost 151 years to the day from 11 March 1869.


The killer Teddy

It is also curious to consider that the first Westerners to shoot a panda were 2 sons of U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt, called Kermit -- yes, Kermit -- and Theodore III, during an expedition funded in 1928-29 by the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago. This points to how the elites, represented by Teddy Roosevelt (whose bullying presidency this writer has little respect for) have no problem killing their panda followers if it promotes their agenda. The fact that the panda died by a "shot" also correlates with how today's pandas are literally being shot to death via the mRNA gene-therapy injections.


Unbeknownst to most, Teddy Roosevelt, the 26th President of the United States, was the first to catch "mandate fever". As indicated on, only 1 president prior to Teddy Roosevelt had issued more than 200 executive orders whilst in office (Grover Cleveland, with 253). In fact, the 25 presidents before Teddy issued a total of 1262 executive orders, whilst Teddy alone issued 1081 during his 7-and-a-half years in office at the very start of the 20th century. As shown by a long, long list on, many of those executive orders were to create conservation areas to "protect the environment" (which makes him a hero to leftist tree huggers everywhere). All of this correlates with the mandate fever that demonrats and leftists became infected with during the pandamic as they forced people to "protect the environment" by covering their faces with nappies and created "reserved areas of separation" (6 feet in the U.S., 2 metres in Europe) that had to remain "people free".


According to, Teddy quadrupled the amount of protected land from 42 million acres to 172 million, meaning that 130 million acres became unusable to the American population thanks to Teddy. To give you a sense of how much land that encompasses, 130 million acres are equivalent to around 526,000 square kilometres or 205,000 square miles. For a square piece of land to be of that size, it must be 725 km by 725 km or 450 miles by 450 miles. To put it in greater perspective, the area that Teddy put under permanent government ownership, away from the ownership of private American citizens, is equivalent to 7% of the entire size of the "lower 48", i.e. all 50 states except Alaska and Hawaii (according to the state sizes listed on Given that the vast majority of this reserved land is out in the west, Teddy Roosevelt effectively sealed off a significant portion of the American West from development and population growth, especially as the 20th century began to offer Americans more advanced means of transport that would have made it very palatable for Americans to populate and develop more areas in the West. This "quarantining" of Western land contributed greatly to the strange phenomenon in America where the vast concentration of the population remains in the urban areas on either coast, with the middle of the country remaining largely unpopulated. This has helped the demonrats enormously over the years, since they have been able to turn urban areas into rat-breeding grounds of fantasy-driven indoctrination, whilst the more down-to-Earth and morally aware middle of the country remains with limited population power to sway elections.


RINO (Ruth in name only)

The first Westerner to take a panda to the West was Ruth Harkness, an American fashion designer and socialite who brought a panda cub from China to the Brookfield Zoo in Chicago, without using a cage, apparently holding the cub in her arms during the trip. Given that socialising and the peer-pressure-riddled world of fashion point to the Canaanite spirit in a negative way, we can say that Ruth Harkness' trapping of a panda points to how panda followers can be so easily manipulated and caged by their Canaanite and "well-meaning" charmers. Given that the word "ruth" in English is a synonym for pity, compassion, or mercy, Ruth Harkness seemed to be living by her name as she avoided a cage to transport the panda cub from China to Chicago. However, the end result was that that tiny cub ended up living in a cage in Chicago for the rest of its life when she dropped it off at the Brookfield Zoo. Hence, her actions are a spiritual figure of how the Canaanite elites label themselves as "ruth" and carry out superficial actions that give the appearance of "ruth" or "mercy" but are, at the end of the day, ruthless and merciless, viciously smearing and destroying anyone who confronts them and imprisoning the naive panda souls that fall prey to them. Hence, it is no coincidence that it only takes replacing the letter "k" with the letters "sh" to turn Ruth Harkness' surname from "Harkness" to "Harshness", for that is what the "lovey-dovey" and "compassionate" matriarchals are really about.


The panda cub that Ruth Harkness brought from China died in 1938, a mere 2 years after arriving in Chicago, according to This points to the figurative and literal premature death that the matriarchal elites trigger on young pandas, and it correlates with the recent spike in "mysterious" deaths of healthy young people around the world (as described on


Interestingly, Ruth named the cub after the sister-in-law of a Chinese expedition partner, since Ruth believed that the cub was a female. As it turns out, the cub was actually a male, which points to how the matriarchy endeavours to "effeminise", i.e. "soulify", everyone in order to neutralise their "male" spirit nature, and it correlates with the recent bombardment of "gender fluidity" ideology being promoted by the worthless liberals at the time of this writing.


It is also worth noting that, in early 1938, Ruth Harkness brought a second panda from China to be a companion to the first panda, possibly because she felt guilty about the first panda being so lonely. However, it turned out that the two pandas could not stand each other and fought constantly, for which reason they had to be separated. This not only points to the physical (6 ft. or 2 m.) separation that panda souls have subjected themselves to during the WuHan flu pandamic, but it also points to how acts of matriarchal "kindness" and "compassion" always end up wreaking death and sorrow. The first panda actually died of pneumonia a few weeks after the arrival of the second panda, showing once again the benefits of matriarchal ruth.


Death from Chicago

It is also no coincidence that the first panda brought to the West was caged in Chicago, Illinois and that the first panda killed by a Westerner (at the hands of Teddy's boys) was the result of a trip sponsored by a museum in Chicago. As we have shared before, Chicago is the pastoral-matriarchy capital of America and a hub of Amorite intimidation, Hittite deception, and Canaanite contamination. This whole pandamic has been the pastoral matriarchy's last effort to snuff out the remnant and prevent the manifestation of God's Kingdom, and they have been very successful at doing that with the help of this generation of idiot "panda-mericans".


Sadly, it must be said that the 2 sons of Teddy who killed the panda had tragic endings of their own. As indicated on, Kermit Roosevelt, who was born on 10 October, 1889, in Long Island, New York (in the New York City metropolitan area) died at the age of 53 on 4 June, 1943 (exactly 69 years plus 1 day from the day that these words are being typed and 1 year plus 2 days before D-Day). Kermit committed suicide by shooting himself in the head whilst living in Fort Richardson, Alaska as an intelligence officer in the US Army. His cousin, the worthless and burning-in-hell son of a whore (i.e. son of Jezebel) franklin delano roosevelt used his power as U.S. president to appoint Kermit to that post in an effort to "help" Kermit escape his depression and alcoholism daemons. Kermit's alcoholism, made worse by his depression, had led to liver problems and to his medical discharge from the Army where he had served during World War II (which was still raging in Europe at the time). This is clear evidence of how he was Amoritely hunted down by Hittite spirits of suicide and Canaanite spirits of alcoholism, just as he had hunted down that panda some 14 and a half years earlier. Considering that the 3 spirits involved here (the Amorite, Hittite, and Canaanite spirits) are the main spirits that move in the pastoral-matriarchy capital of Chicago, we can safely say that the city that sent him to hunt down, terrorise, and defile that panda is the same city that drove him to his early death. So shall it be with those who are currently acting as willing soldiers of the matriarchy to enforce her evil mandates by hunting down, terrorising, and attempting to compromise the righteousness of those who oppose her. This writer knows that they are already dying off early, and I expect them to continue to die off in large, large numbers in the coming years. I expect them to be all dead and (a large majority) burning in Sheol 10 years from the date of this writing, and I shall figuratively dance over their shallow graves with great rejoicing, for God's remnant are the third rail of the spirit realm, and it is utterly foolish to mess with that third rail.


"1 And after these things I heard a great voice of much people in heaven, saying, Alleluia; Salvation, and glory, and honour, and power, unto the Lord our God: 2 For true and righteous are his judgments: for he hath judged the great whore, which did corrupt the earth with her fornication, and hath avenged the blood of his servants at her hand. 3 And again they said, Alleluia. And her smoke rose up for ever and ever. 4 And the four and twenty elders and the four beasts fell down and worshipped God that sat on the throne, saying, Amen; Alleluia. 5 And a voice came out of the throne, saying, Praise our God, all ye his servants, and ye that fear him, both small and great. 6 And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of mighty thunderings, saying, Alleluia: for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth." (Revelation 19:1-6)


Similarly, Theodore Roosevelt III, who had been born on Long Island 2 years and 1 month before Kermit, on 13 September, 1887, died 1 year and 1 month after Kermit, on 12 July, 1944 at the age of 56. As indicated on, Theodore III served as an active commander in Europe during World War II, helping in the Allied invasion of Italy. Despite being criticised for being too friendly with the troops he commanded and for not promoting enough discipline, it can be said that Theodore III acted bravely during the war. Before D-Day, he was assigned to England to help lead the storming of the beaches of Normandy. Despite already being 56, Theodore III eloquently requested to be with the rest of the men as they landed in Normandy. Reluctantly, his superior agreed, and Theodore III was part of the men who physically invaded Normandy that fateful day, becoming the only General to land by sea on the first wave of the invasion. Also, at 56, he was the oldest man in the invasion and was also the only man whose son also landed that day (Captain Quentin Roosevelt II, who landed on Omaha Beach whilst Theodore III landed on Utah Beach). The fact that Theodore III survived the landing was a great surprise to his superior, who loved him dearly but expected him to die in the invasion. Theodore III helped his troops to have victory that day by "calling an audible" and changing the original plan of attack after landing on the beach (the potential need to alter the plan on the fly is part of why he wanted to be on the ground with his troops during the landing).


Despite his heroic survival on D-Day, Theodore III still died a mere 36 days later. He had had health problems throughout World War II, suffering from arthritis caused by World War I injuries, which forced him to walk with a cane. He also had heart problems, but he made a concerted effort to keep those problems secret from army doctors and his superiors. Unfortunately, those problems caught up to him, and he died of a heart attack whilst in France. The fact that he died of a heart attack points to how literal heart attacks are and will continue to be the major cause of death for all the pandamic-enforcing soldiers of the matriarchy.


Having said all of the above, this writer must clarify that I do not feel the slightest joy over the early death of Theodore III (in fact, I do not even feel joy for the early, sad death of Kermit proper). However, these 2 men are a figure of the two types of soldiers that have so faithfully served the matriarchy to enforce her lunatical pandamic mandates. According to, Kermit and Theodore III shot the panda at the same time, but this writer is convinced in his being that Kermit's shot left the gun barrel before Theodore III's and that Kermit's bullet was the one that dealt the coup de grace, probably striking the panda in the heart whilst Theodore III hit him in the liver. It is as if with their shots on the panda, each brother mortally wounded the other (Theodore III damaging Kermit's liver and Kermit damaging Theodore III's heart).


Thus, Kermit represents those in the matriarchy's pandamic army who proactively enforced the matriarchy's decrees against the naive pandas and against the unwilling remnant. Showing no brotherly love or respect for their fellow men, they were willing to murder him if that is what it took to enforce the mandates. Theodore III, on the other hand, represents those who were not so proactive in their enforcement of the mandates, cringing as they saw what those mandates were doing to their fellow human beings but who were at a loss as to what to do, never willing to openly challenge the system that was calling them to kill their brothers and sisters. They decided to play along, hoping that the matriarchal mandates had a raison d'être and that they would, in the long term, do more good than harm. This writer must say that I shall not feel much joy (if any) over the deaths of the matriarchy soldiers represented by Theodore III, but it is a fact that God shall still hold them accountable, for you are still responsible before Him if you usher a man to his untimely death, even if you are not the one inserting the lethal injection at the end of the process.


The red panda

As you may know, there are 2 different animals that are called "pandas". One is the "giant panda bear" we have been discussing here, and the other is the red panda. Though similar to the giant panda bear in its appearance and diet, the red panda is actually closer genetically to raccoons and weasels. As indicated on, the red panda is native to the eastern Himalayas and southwestern China and is mostly herbivorous, eating mostly bamboo. However, it may occasionally eat fruits, blossoms, eggs, birds, and small mammals, meaning that it is more carnivorous and "huntingly opportunistic" than its larger namesake.


Just like the panda bear, the red panda possesses a false "thumb", which makes it easier for them to hold the bamboo stalks whilst they eat them. As we have shared before, the thumb is spiritually related to the apostolic ministry of wisdom and judgements. Hence, the false "thumb" in both the red and the giant panda points to the false wisdom and judgements that spiritual pandas embrace in order to live completely satisfied with a steady diet of simplistic, low-nutrition spiritual food. Interestingly enough, the red panda is a poor digester of bamboo, which quickly passes through its digestive system in 2 to 4 hours. This points to how believers in the Church constantly munch down on soul food (devoid of wisdom) from their matriarchal pastors, food that is not made for their spirit and that passes through their soul without making much of a spiritual, eternal dent.


It is believed that the red panda is both nocturnal and crepuscular, crepuscular meaning "active during the twilight hours of either dusk or dawn". This contrasts with the giant panda, which is believed to be active mostly during the morning, the afternoon, and midnight (according to This means that the red panda leans more towards operating in darkness than does the giant panda, which spiritually points to a more stealthy and "weaselly" behaviour.


Just like the giant panda, the red panda exhibits behaviour that hints of "laziness" or "lethargy". For example, in hot weather, red pandas sleep on tree branches with their legs dangling, which makes sense from a natural perspective (since that may help them to cool off), but it spiritually points to an attitude of indifference and unwillingness to propel oneself past the current state of things. In captivity, the red panda has been known to sleep between periods of activity at night, which makes sense from a natural perspective (due to their low-nutrition diet), but it once again points in a spiritual sense to indifference and stagnation. The red panda usually eats sitting down or standing up, but it occasionally eats whilst lying on its back, which yet again points spiritually to lethargy or indifference. It also points in a subtle way to the Hivite spirit of entitlement that leads people to believe that "they have arrived" and have no need to strive towards a new spiritual dimension.


Interestingly enough, the red panda does exhibit signs of "non-lethargy", as when it moves quickly on the ground by bounding or trotting. Red pandas can also be aggressive with each other, arching their backs and tails and slowly moving their heads up and down as a preliminary indication that they are about to strike. They are also known to be loud during fights and aggressive chasing, with their sounds including growling, barking, squealing, and grunting. All of this more "frantic" behaviour (at least as compared to the giant panda) points once again to the red horse of the Apocalypse, the horse of conflict and division, a horse whose nature is "stripped out" of the giant panda, whose colours point (as we shared earlier) to the horses before and after the red horse, i.e. the white horse and the black horse. Therefore, we can say that the red panda spiritually represents the conflictiveness and aggression that has been sucked out of the spiritual giant pandas, meaning that, as people embrace a giant panda nature, the red-horse conflictiveness that is potentially within them is transferred over to the spiritual red-panda weasels who then use it to establish control over the more docile "giant pandas".


{As a parenthesis, it is worth noting that the red panda was called 火狐 (pronounced huô hú) in ancient Chinese writings, which literally means "firefox". Apparently, the "fire" (火) in the name was a reference to the red panda's fiery red colour, and it is a spiritual reference to the fiery, red-horse-like conflictiveness embedded in the red panda's nature.}


It is also interesting to consider that red pandas are solitary and territorial, with "home ranges" of around 1 square kilometre (around 0.4 square miles) each. In other words, red pandas naturally practice "social distancing", which correlates with the ludicrous and unscientific policies of "social distancing" that the red-panda weasel liberals used throughout the world to cement the "pandamic" and turn the vast majority of the population into docile pandas.


The other Georgia

It is no spiritual coincidence that all of the above has been shared in the context of a word that was sent by God from the U.S. state of Georgia. As you may know, whenever a place named "Georgia" is mentioned somewhere in the world, most listeners will think of one of two places: either the south-eastern American state of Georgia or the Republic of Georgia to the southwest of Russia. As you may also know, the nations of Georgia and Ukraine have been the former Soviet republics that have had the greatest conflict with Russia since God supernaturally and miraculously dissolved the Soviet Union in 1991. Unbeknownst to most Americans, Georgia and Russia went to war in 2008 (the first European war of the 21st century). As indicated on, the Russians invaded Georgia and helped Russian separatists in the Georgian regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia to secede from Georgia. Russia also bullied Georgia into not joining NATO, which is ironic, since nations such as Georgia feel the need to join Western alliances such as NATO precisely to protect themselves from Russian aggression. During the brief war, the Russians expelled ethnic Georgians from South Ossetia and the Kodori Gorge in Abkhazia, eventually establishing Russian military bases in the 2 former Georgian regions. Russia eventually withdrew from Georgia for 4 reasons. First, Georgia proved to be a tougher and more unyielding rival than expected despite being taken by surprise and caught unprepared. Second, Russia was able to effectively steal part of Georgian territory and control it through "Russia-friendly" regimes (the way the Soviet Union did throughout Eastern Europe during the Cold War). Third, the President of the United States at the time was George W. Bush (the 43rd and last President the old American Republic had; there has been no visible President since). Russia knew that Bush, the President under which America invaded Iraq and Afghanistan and overthrew saddam hussein and the Taliban, was no pushover and would not tolerate too much aggression against Georgia. And fourth, putin was not worried about looking bad if Russia did not achieve a resounding defeat of Georgia because he had stopped being the "official" President of Russia 3 months earlier (in May 2008) and was now "just" the "Prime Minister of Russia", with Medvedev as the "official" President; putin had left the Presidency after being in power between 2000 and 2008 because the Russian Constitution prevented him running for a third consecutive term, but everyone knew that he was the one in charge, only he was now running things from the "Prime Minister" position. Had full-of-pride putin been the official President, it is pretty certain that he would have tried harder to topple the Georgian government to avoid looking weak.


Unbeknownst to most Ukraine-flag-waving American liberals, Russia also invaded Ukraine 6 years after invading Georgia, in 2014 (it is "odd" how these liberals did not care at all about Ukraine then). In that conflict, Russia stole Crimea and the major Black Sea port city of Sevastopol from Ukraine, annexing it to Russia that same year (as indicated on This emboldened the pro-Russian separatist groups in the Donbas region of Ukraine, which eventually became the excuse for the invasion of Ukraine 8 years later. Hence, we can see how Ukraine and Georgia are so similar in their experience with putin's Russia. They also share a similar history in terms of significant "revolutions". Georgia experienced the "Rose Revolution" in November 2003. As indicated on, this revolution started with massive protests over apparent fraud in Georgia's parliamentary elections, which led to the eventual ouster of President Eduard Shevardnadze. Interestingly, this movement was called the "Rose Revolution" because of the demonstrators that stormed a session of Parliament with red roses in their hands (sadly, a similar but less violent action in America 6 years later would be treated much more harshly and lead to no one's ouster).


If the name "Shevardnadze" sounds familiar to some of you (as it was to me), it is because he was the Foreign Minister of the Soviet Union from 1985 to 1990 under Gorbachev and was, in many respects, a good man who not only helped end the Russian occupation of Afghanistan but also allowed the reunification of Germany and withdrew occupying Soviet forces from Eastern Europe (as indicated on He also fought corruption and promoted economic growth in Georgia as First Secretary of Georgia (the Soviet equivalent of a "state governor") between 1972 and 1985, prior to becoming Foreign Minister. Unfortunately, his time as President of the independent republic of Georgia was not as successful, especially because it was tainted with moral compromise. Georgia's first president, elected in October 1990, was a scientist, writer, and human rights activist named Zviad Gamsakhurdia, who was a bit of a complicated character himself. In many ways, Gamsakhurdia was a very brave man, openly opposing the Soviets' oppression of human rights in Georgia, which led to a life of imprisonment and constant harassment. In fact, he was arrested in 1977 for "anti-Soviet activities" by Shevardnaze, who, at the time, was the First Secretary of the Georgia Communist Party. The next year, 1978, whilst still in jail, Gamsakhurdia gave a television interview in which he apologised for "taking the wrong road" and disseminating human rights literature. Despite his apology, he was sentenced to 3 years in the camps plus 3 years of exile, but his sentence was commuted to 2 years of exile in nearby Dagestan. Years later, Gamsakhurdia said that he gave that confession and apology to ensure that he would be free by 1980 and be able to continue his work, thereby revealing that, despite being a man of great courage and determination, there was a streak of pragmatism in him that tainted his principles. He did not understand that, by denouncing his own activities to avoid a heavier sentence, he unwittingly released a spirit of delay and disarray into the Georgian atmosphere that would come back to haunt both him and the Georgian people years later.


When Georgia broke away from the Soviet Union in 1990, Gamsakhurdia was elected President by an overwhelming majority due to his years as a human-rights fighter. However, the country quickly descended into great discord because he had sold the weight of his spiritual authority for a couple of years of pragmatic human-rights work. When he was on the verge of carrying out a green-horse sacrifice for the people of Georgia back in 1978, he regressed to red-horse and black-horse work. So, when he was miraculously given the Presidency of a free Georgia many years, he went from being a resurrected green-horse rider (that would have led Georgia to glory years) to being nothing more than a compromised half-good, half-bad leader who lacked the spiritual moral authority to effect transcendental change. Having become a non-green spiritual "panda" after his 1978 compromise, he slowly became subject to a spirit of Korah deception that turned him increasingly paranoid, which led to him becoming dictatorial and repressive against anyone that resisted him in any way. As a result, the people of Georgia became disgruntled with him, and, as the Georgians' opposition intensified more and more, he was eventually ousted in a coup during which he escaped to neighbouring Azerbaijan and eventually to the Russian Republic of Chechnya (his readiness to flee once again showed his unwillingness to face green-horse death, choosing to believe that it was more "practical" for him to stay alive and somehow make a comeback from the outside). He made a partial comeback but eventually died on 31 December 1993 in circumstances that have remained unclear to this day. Shevardnadze was placed as Gamsakhurdia's replacement, acting as the de facto President (with support from Russia, which required moral compromise) until he was officially elected by Georgians in 1995 and re-elected in 2000. However, he became caught up in conflict from the pro-Gamsakhurdia supporters who kept trying to overthrow him, the conflict in neighbouring Chechnya that created friction with Russia, and the rampant mafia corruption that even involved some of his closest advisers and several family members. Because he was a man who had good intentions but had always been willing to compromise to "work within the system", he never had the spiritual authority to overcome all these challenges. Therefore, when corrupt parliamentary elections were held in November 2003, the Georgian people had had enough, and they rose up in the Rose Revolution to take down his regime. Shevardnadze agreed to resign peacefully to avoid bloodshed, which shows that he had some degree of moral principle and was not simply a power-hungry politician.


Interestingly enough, one year later, in November 2004, Ukraine experienced its own Revolution, the Orange Revolution, which was also caused by public uproar over corruption in the 2004 Presidential elections. The public outcry led to a "do-over" of the elections, only now under more strict auditing, which led to a change in the result and the election of one Viktor over another, Viktor Yushchenko over the initial "winner" Viktor Yanukovych. Considering how both the Rose Revolution in Georgia and the Orange Revolution in Ukraine stemmed from a rejection of authoritarianism and fraudulent elections, it is utterly ironic that American liberals are now so gleefully supporting the Ukrainian people after first accepting the fraudulent elections of 2020 without question and after happily submitting to the unnecessary tyranny of demonrat lockdowns, mandates, censorship, and prolonged imprisonment of protestors at the Capitol. It is also ironic that the very people who decry these things in America are opposed to the Ukrainian people and want them to be under the oppressive boot of a neo-Soviet putinian empire.


Winder, Georgia

The prophetic email that spawned this series of postings on Georgia was sent by a site visitor in Winder, Georgia. This is no spiritual coincidence, especially in the context of the pandamic.


Doctor's Day

As indicated on, Winder, Georgia is the site of the first "Doctor's Day" observance in America, on 28 March 1933. Coincidentally, this was almost 87 years to the day of the beginning of the generalised lockdowns throughout America. That first Doctor's Day observance included the mailing of cards to physicians and their wives, along with placing flowers on the graves of dead doctors, all of which correlates with how doctors and nurses began to be praised as mythical "war heroes" at the start of the mass delusion. The Doctor's Day observance was approved at the state level in Augusta by the Georgia State Medical Alliance the next year, on 10 May 1934. Interestingly, a large number of countries celebrate Mother's Day on 10 May, regardless of the day of the week it lands on, which emphasises the observance's soulish and matriarchal nature. The fact that it was approved in Augusta also points in a subtle way to the spiritual connection between this entire pandamic and the fall of the Roman empire (since "Augustus" was the first Roman emperor). The Doctor's Day observance was then introduced and approved the next year to the Women's Alliance of the Southern Medical Association, held in St. Louis Missouri between 19 and 22 November, 1935, becoming an integral observance by the Southern Medical Association Alliance ever since. The fact that it became permanent at a "Women's Alliance" meeting yet again emphasises its matriarchal, soulish, and anti-male-Spirit-nature.


As we have said before, this undue veneration of nurses and the medical profession emphasises the matriarchy's fundamental misunderstanding of the Church's "male" warrior nature. Pastors, being servers and "nurses" by nature, think of the Church as little more than a glorified hospital where the "wise" pastors and their deacons attend to a multitude of hapless and spiritually impotent souls that would not last a day and inevitably die without their "mercy" and "spiritual expertise". Instead of understanding that the Church was designed by God to be an army with a hospital to attend to those injured in "male" spiritual battle, the matriarchal pastors see the Church as a hospital with an "army" of "doctors" and "nurses" attending to a mass of permanently disabled souls unfit for battle. This is why, at the start of the pandamic, the doctors and nurses were constantly labelled as "frontline heroes" (at least in America) and were given the honour and accolades that are usually reserved for the people who truly put their lives on the line in literal battlefields. As opposed to real soldiers who have to face real bullets and IEDs, these doctors and nurses were dealing with a virus that had a 99.7% survival rate and was readily treatable with inexpensive and decades-old medicines such as Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, medicines that they "heroically" denied to the rest of the population in order to satisfy the interests of politicians that would be unable to define what a virus is, even if their lives depended on it. These doctors and nurses also "heroically" jammed ventilators down patients' throats, even when ventilators were exacerbating the spread of the virus within the patients' respiratory system, but they did so because there was a financial incentive for every ventilator they could use (how brave, how courageous!). These doctors and nurses also had the courage to administer Remdesevir to sick patients over and over again, even when Remdesevir had been proved ineffective and unsafe in clinical trials. Thus, the combined use of ventilators and Remdesevir, along with the withholding of cheap and effective medicine, "heroically" triggered many more deaths than the lives these "heroes" may have saved.


On top of all of this, these "heroic" doctors and nurses continued to hold a job and receive a salary even as the general population was deliberately denied the right to work and earn a living, leading to the bankruptcy of countless businesses and to the economic obliteration of countless lives. Said another way, these doctors and nurses were being compensated rather nicely as they continued to do the job that they would have been doing anyway had there been no pandamic, and their industry actually became richer due to all the financial government incentives to label patients as "virus infected" and to label as many deaths as possible as "virus casualties". By contrast, literal soldiers have to abandon their regular lifestyle and put their lives on the line, often getting paid a salary that is much lower than what they could achieve in their regular lives. The self-righteous hubris of the medical industry for simply doing their paid job is a manifestation of the matriarchal pastors' tendency to forget that they are "servers", "waiters", not "lords". One can be very grateful to a waiter for the great service that he has provided during a meal, and one can even go out of one's way to provide him with a great tip, but that does not mean that we must forget that, at the end of the day, the waiter is doing the job that he is getting paid for. He is not "volunteering" his time and effort, separating himself from what he would normally be doing, to serve us the meal. He is merely providing a service, and he himself is benefitting from that service by the salary that he is paid for providing it. This writer is now reminded of a television episode where a doctor, offended by a medical examiner (M.E.) investigating the death of one of his patients, says to the M.E., "Don't you realise that there are many people out there whom I have operated on who owe their lives to me?". When I heard that, the immediate response in my heart was,

"Why should we praise you for doing that? Aren't you handsomely compensated for your work? Isn't saving people what you are supposed to do? It is not as if you are doing the world a 'generous favour' by performing these operations. Besides, the successful operations you have performed have required knowledge and equipment provided to you by others, placed at your disposal at no cost to you so that you could do your job. Instead of bragging about the lives you have saved, you should be ashamed of the lives that you could have saved but did not."

Sadly, the M.E. character on the television show did not provide such an answer, but it is still the spiritual answer that pastors, at the spiritual level, and medical staff, at the natural level, need to hear when they become drunk with "hero hubris".


"7 But which of you, having a servant plowing or feeding cattle, will say unto him by and by, when he is come from the field, Go and sit down to meat? 8 And will not rather say unto him, Make ready wherewith I may sup, and gird thyself, and serve me, till I have eaten and drunken; and afterward thou shalt eat and drink? 9 Doth he thank that servant because he did the things that were commanded him? I trow not. 10 So likewise ye, when ye shall have done all those things which are commanded you, say, We are unprofitable servants: we have done that which was our duty to do." (Luke 17:7-10)


Jameson Inn

Interestingly, Winder, Georgia is also the place where the first "Jameson Inn" was opened, back in 1987. Trivial as this may seem to some, this has spiritual significance. As indicated on, Jameson Inn was an American hotel chain that had begun in 1981 as "Signature Inn" in Indianapolis, Indiana. This points to both the "hospitality" industry and to Indiana, which, in turn, points to what we have shared before on Fort Wayne, Indiana and the 5th seal. As we have also shared before, believers in the 5th seal act as weak "pastor-teachers" in a state of hibernation as they await the full-blown 6th-seal manifestation of God's vindicating vengeance. During this 5th-seal hibernation, they are placed in a "blue bubble" that acts as their "hospital" as they await their permanent home from which they will be able to manifest the full-blown nature of God. The fact that Jameson Inn was originally called "Signature Inn" points to the signs on the foreheads of those in the 5th seal, a sign that serves as "certification" that they belong within the bubble of God's 5th-seal protection.


"3 And the glory of the God of Israel was gone up from the cherub, whereupon he was, to the threshold of the house. And he called to the man clothed with linen, which had the writer's inkhorn by his side; 4 And the LORD said unto him, Go through the midst of the city, through the midst of Jerusalem, and set a mark upon the foreheads of the men that sigh and that cry for all the abominations that be done in the midst thereof. 5 And to the others he said in mine hearing, Go ye after him through the city, and smite: let not your eye spare, neither have ye pity" (Ezekiel 9:3-5)


The fact that Signature Inn permanently moved to Winder, Georgia 6 years after starting in Indiana points not only to the temporary nature of the remnant's stay in "5th-seal Indiana" but to the permanent home that they will have when the 6th seal is opened. The fact that they were renamed as "Jameson Inn" also has spiritual significance. The name "Jameson" clearly stands for "son of James", and, as you may know, "James" is a name used in English as a synonym for "Jacob" (for reasons unknown to this writer), which is confirmed by the fact that, in Scripture, the apostle known as "James" in the English text is actually called "Jacob" in the original Greek text. Hence, we can say that the name "Jameson" is equivalent to "son of Jacob", and, as you may know, the literal sons of Jacob are the people of Israel. This means that, as the remnant emerge from the 5th seal, they shall be recognised as the true Jews, the true Israelites.


"8 I know thy works: behold, I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it: for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name. 9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee." (Revelation 3:8-9)


{As a parenthesis, it is also worth considering that "Jacob" (the name translated as "James" in the KJV) literally means "supplanter", which correlates with what we shall say later in this posting. It must be said, however, that "supplanter" here has a more positive context since it speaks of the remnant working to topple the pastoral matriarchy, which the matriarchals see as a "rebellious coup", for they will die without admitting that they were the ones in actual rebellion, working tirelessly to have the soul supplant the place that belongs to the spirit.}


In 2014, 33 years after their start in Indiana, Jameson Inn was acquired by Vantage Hospitality, a company headquartered in Coral Springs, Florida. This prophetically pointed to how Florida, some 6 years later, would become a haven, a refuge for freedom in America that has extended its hospitality to people fleeing virus-related oppression. As you may know, Florida, though far from perfect, has become the "freest" state in America, becoming the only state where people have been given a chance from the beginning to live with relative normality in the midst of all the ignorant superstition and oppression that has raged elsewhere. The fact that Vantage Hospitality is based in Coral Springs, a part of Miami's metropolitan area, points yet again to a "refuge for true Jews", for, as situation comedies often emphasise, Miami is a place where Jews go to retire (on an episode of "Caroline in the City", when a Jewish character says, "There is no hell in Judaism", the show's main character innocently asks, "Oh, where do your people go when they die, then?", to which the Jewish character quickly responds, "Miami").


Red Lion

In 2016, 2 years after acquiring Jameson Inn, Vantage Hospitality was acquired by Red Lion Hotels Corporation. The 2 years point to the 2 years that Joseph had to wait in prison after interpreting the drink bearer's dream (Genesis 40:20-41:1), meaning that, after so many years in prison, Joseph was forced to wait a while longer in order to be vindicated and become second only to Pharaoh in all of Egypt. As we have shared before, the "lion" speaks of judgements. Hence, the "Red Lion" speaks of the bloody and brutal 6th-seal judgement that God shall unleash through the remnant to vindicate them and as the full-blown God nature in them is manifested, even if the remnant are forced to endure a delay before that vindication comes.


"1 Who is this that cometh from Edom, with dyed garments from Bozrah? this that is glorious in his apparel, travelling in the greatness of his strength? I that speak in righteousness, mighty to save. 2 Wherefore art thou red in thine apparel, and thy garments like him that treadeth in the winefat? 3 I have trodden the winepress alone; and of the people there was none with me: for I will tread them in mine anger, and trample them in my fury; and their blood shall be sprinkled upon my garments, and I will stain all my raiment. 4 For the day of vengeance is in mine heart, and the year of my redeemed is come. 5 And I looked, and there was none to help; and I wondered that there was none to uphold: therefore mine own arm brought salvation unto me; and my fury, it upheld me. 6 And I will tread down the people in mine anger, and make them drunk in my fury, and I will bring down their strength to the earth." (Isaiah 63:1-6)


Opportunistic dominion attempt

In 2008, according to, Columbia Pacific Opportunity Fund, an investment manager for the Baty family, a Seattle family that founded a company called "Emeritus Corporation", tried to acquire Red Lion by submitting an unsolicited acquisition offer of US$9.50 per share. At that time, Columbia Pacific held 12.7 percent of Red Lion but was clearly intent on becoming the majority owner. Red Lion did not agree to the offer, and Columbia Pacific withdrew the offer by October of that year. Concerned about a future takeover attempt, Red Lion then implemented what is known in the investment world as a "poison pill" plan, which, in essence, is a plan that is triggered upon a hostile takeover attempt where the shareholders agree to execute certain actions that erode the company's value, thus making it very unprofitable for the buyer to acquire the company. Even though Columbia Pacific had already withdrawn their offer, Red Lion's poison-pill plan infuriated them, causing them to smear Red Lion in the financial world by stating that Red Lion should be liquidated because its assets were in excess of its market capitalisation (meaning that Red Lion's assets should be sold off and the company dismantled because the assets were worth more than what the market was willing to pay for the company's shares, as when a machine's scrap metal is worth more than what people are willing to pay for the machine itself). Later that year, Red Lion's stocks rose in value, thereby disproving Columbia Pacific's smear, prompting Red Lion to remove its poison pill, knowing that it was safe from Columbia Pacific's hostile takeover.


Again, you may be asking, why should we care about some obscure stock-market takeover attempt? Because it is strongly related to everything that we have been saying here. Red Lion's determination to take a "poison pill" and (figuratively) die rather than be owned by Columbia Pacific points to the remnant's willingness to die rather than bow their knee to the lunatical and fascistic dominion of the left wing that has tried to force God's remnant to submit to superstitious and medically counterproductive masks, to medically-injurious and ineffective mRNA gene-therapy injections, and to unjustifiable self-sequestrations. Even the share price of US$9.50 offered by Columbia Pacific has significance, given that 950 equals 19 times 50, which points to the number "19", a number we all know is strongly linked to the virus used to "justify" all the madness and tyranny. The name "Columbia Pacific" and that company's vitriolic smearing of Red Lion after they refused their hostile takeover also points to the hypocrisy of the tyrannical left, which always portray themselves as "pacific", "tolerant", and "compassionate" but are, in reality, the most ruthless and violent of all people (as shown when they try to destroy the reputation of anyone who disagrees with them, or when they engage in violent looting and rioting when a decision does not go their way, or when they physically assault people who dare to wear attire that they dislike). The fact that the family behind Columbia Pacific's takeover attempt is based in Seattle reinforces all of this, given that Seattle and the American Northwest have become a cesspool of left-wing radicalism and the epicentre of terrorist operations by the group that calls itself "Antifa" (but whose real name is "ProDemFa", "Promoters of Democrat Fascism").


Even the full name of "Columbia Pacific", "Columbia Pacific Opportunity Fund", has spiritual significance, for it points to the spirit of weaselly opportunism that the left wing have engaged in, using the virus as an opportunity to seize power and illegitimately depose the people who have the true right to that power.


Attack from the Emeritus elite

The fact that the family that owns "Emeritus Corporation" was behind the hostile takeover attempt of Red Lion is no spiritual coincidence. As you may know, the word "emeritus" is commonly associated with the term "emeritus professor", which points to the spirit of white academic elitism that fashions the leftist agenda that has driven this pandamic. It is these white academic liberal fascist elites who not only fashion this lunatical agenda but also craft the strategies to impose it and destroy those who dare to oppose it. Mind you, this deliberate agenda is driven by the worst that the white race has to offer, not by blacks, hispanics, or people of any other race (blacks and hispanics opportunistically tag along for the ride, but they are not the ones driving). This white liberal fascist agenda is based on pastoral elitism that lives in a mythical, self-imagined universe where they are the heroes and everyone else is a sad little victim floating in an ocean of purposelessness, hopeless wailing their arms in the hopes that the "heroes" will save them from themselves.


Emeritus murderers

Interestingly enough, the Emeritus Corporation runs "Emeritus Senior Living", a nationwide institution that supposedly provides medical care for senior citizens. This correlates with the callous murdering of senior citizens committed by American pseudo-state governors such as andrew cuomo (whose spiritual name is "andy coma") and phil murphy (whose spiritual name is "filth murky"). Even when the WuHan flu virus was overwhelmingly targeting senior citizens (with almost everyone else barely harmed), andy coma and filth murky ordered nursing homes to retain and receive back infected seniors and not send them to hospital, which was allegedly intended to keep hospital beds available for all the other sick patients that they were expecting. By sequestering infected seniors with other vulnerable seniors in these nursing homes, these weasels triggered a massive spread of the virus amongst senior citizens, leading to the deaths of thousands upon thousands of seniors who would have otherwise been OK. All the while, the hospital beds that these poor seniors vacated remained largely unused, meaning that the senior citizens' "sacrificial" death was completely for naught.


Based on the above, it is no coincidence that the "heroic" nurses and staff of Emeritus Senior Living have been documented for openly abusing seniors. As indicated on, an episode of "Frontline" (a PBS television show in America) that aired on 30 July, 2013 documented the alleged physical abuses and neglect inflicted on patients by the "heroes" of Emeritus. In fact, in a civil lawsuit in Sacramento, California (Joan Boice at al v. Emeritus Corporation), a jury found Emeritus guilty of neglect that resulted in the death of a patient in 2009, assessing a penalty of US$23 million on Emeritus. This amount is no spiritual coincidence, for, as we have shared before, the number "23" points to the pastoral ministry, meaning that the jury was spiritually declaring that Emeritus owed its patients the pastoral care that it arrogantly claims to provide. Sadly, in typical pastoral-matriarchy fashion, Emeritus' reaction to the Frontline exposé was to set up a website to dispute the allegations. As we have shared before, distorted pastors, i.e. Canaanites, have a vitriolic hatred of judgements, and they are quick to attack and destroy anyone who dares to expose them through righteous judgements. Even after being proved guilty, Canaanites continue to deny the truth and attack the legitimate judgements against them, instead of attacking the unrighteousness within them that led to the judgements in the first place.


Most people in America may not recall this, but the first news of the WuHan flu virus making its presence in America surfaced in the Washington state area, where a nursing home began to experience multiple senior-citizen infections and deaths. This yet again correlates with the fact that the Baty family that founded Emeritus Corporation is from Seattle, Washington. This confirms even further the spiritual reason why this word on the pandamic emanates from a prophetic email sent from Winder, Georgia, given the subtle spiritual link between Winder (where "Jameson Inn" was established) and a financial "stock attack" from the Emeritus Corporation in Seattle, Washington.


The weasel-birthing panda

The giant panda's scientific name is Ailuropoda melanoleuca, which literally means "black-and-white cat-foot". The "melano" part of the name (from the word melas) means "black", the "leuca" part (from the word leukos) means "white", the "poda" part (as in the English word "podiatrist") means "foot", and the "ailuro" part comes from the Greek word ailouros meaning "cat". In fact, the Latin word aielouros, which the Romans took from their Greek cousins, was used in ancient Rome as a literary designation for "cat".


According to, the word aielouros, or ailouros in its Greek form, is derived from the words aiolos meaning "fast, nimble" and oura meaning "tail", referring to the cat's nimbleness and agility, as well as the cats' habit of raising their tails to greet people (as indicated on Interestingly enough, the Greek word ailouros can also mean "weasel", which may be derived from the fact that weasels were used by ancient Greeks and Romans as "pest-control pets" before they switched to cats, since cats proved to be more pleasant to have around the house and were better at mouse hunting (as indicated on The connection of ailouros to panda bears and to both cats and weasels is no spiritual coincidence.


As indicated on, weasels are nimble predators with a streamlined long body that allows them to sneak in through tight spaces to get to their prey, which comes in handy when they are chasing burrowing rodents down narrow tunnels. This "sneaky-entry" ability is why farmers with chicken coops need to be wary of them. Their streamlined long body is enabled by an unusually high metabolism, meaning that, unlike bears, weasels cannot accumulate high levels of fat reserves. This means that they struggle to retain body heat, especially because they also cannot have fattening thick furs. As a result, they must eat a great deal of food, and they must process it very quickly. This is why weasels usually eat 20% to 40% of their body weight every day, meaning that they actively go after any meat available, including rabbits, birds, reptiles, and even amphibians. They have also been known to run off with and eat the eggs that they find when they raid a bird's nest or a chicken coop, poking a small hole in the egg and lapping up the contents as they ooze out of the shell. Their need to eat and eat also leads them to kill more prey than they can consume at once, storing the extra kill near their dens for future meals. As indicated on, this distinguishes them from animals such as raccoons, which, when they raid a chicken coop, tend to leave the uneaten chickens alone. This behaviour of "overkilling" in weasels is what has given them a reputation as bloodthirsty and cut-throat animals.


Notice how all of the above contrasts with the behaviour of panda bears. Whereas the panda bear sits down to eat food that is out in the open and that cannot "run away" (i.e. bamboo stalks), weasels dart around chasing fast prey, squeezing through narrow tunnels and small holes, if needed, to get to them. Whereas the panda bear is fixated on a low-nutrition, vegetarian diet consisting mostly of one plant, the weasel is fixated on a high-nutrition meat diet consisting of just about any small animal he can eat. Whereas the panda bear can store fat and rely on it for heat and to maintain their low metabolism, weasels cannot store fat and must rely on their fast metabolism to produce heat and stay warm. Whereas panda bears have a reputation for being peaceful and cuddly animals (despite being real bears), the weasel has a reputation for being a vicious, almost over-the-top killer. How, then, are these animals spiritually related, and, if they are, what is the meaning of that spiritual connection?


To answer that, we must consider the one part of the panda bear's scientific name that we did not consider. As we shared above, the panda's scientific name means "black-and-white cat-foot". We have already pointed how the "black" and "white" colours in the panda point to the white and black horses of the Apocalypse, and the "cat" part points to the Hivite fat-cat spirit of lazy entitlement. What does the "foot" part represent? In the scientific name, the "foot" part is represented by poda, which is derived from the Greek word pous or podi meaning "foot". Interestingly enough, there is a word besides pous (which is used in 86 verses of Scripture) that can be used in to refer to feet, the word basis, which is used once in Scripture, in verse 7 of the following passage, translated as "feet":


"1 Now Peter and John went up together into the temple at the hour of prayer, being the ninth hour. 2 And a certain man lame from his mother's womb was carried, whom they laid daily at the gate of the temple which is called Beautiful, to ask alms of them that entered into the temple; 3 Who seeing Peter and John about to go into the temple asked an alms. 4 And Peter, fastening his eyes upon him with John, said, Look on us. 5 And he gave heed unto them, expecting to receive something of them. 6 Then Peter said, Silver and gold have I none; but such as I have give I thee: In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth rise up and walk. 7 And he took him by the right hand, and lifted him up: and immediately his feet and ankle bones received strength. 8 And he leaping up stood, and walked, and entered with them into the temple, walking, and leaping, and praising God. 9 And all the people saw him walking and praising God: 10 And they knew that it was he which sat for alms at the Beautiful gate of the temple: and they were filled with wonder and amazement at that which had happened unto him." (Acts 3:1-10)


Notice how basis is used in the context of a person who was incapacitated and was suddenly given an infusion of power that enabled him to fully operate again. This points to a spiritual connection between basis and enablement or empowerment. Even though the enablement or empowerment described in the passage above is clearly a good and positive one, it can be inferred that basis can also refer to empowerment in a negative context. As you may have noticed, the Greek word basis is identical to the English word "basis" meaning "something that underlies, supports, or is essential to something else" or "a principle on which something depends or from which something has issued", according to (this makes sense since the feet are literally what supports the rest of the body and from which the rest of the body "issues" upwards). Hence, we can conclude that the large presence of spiritual pandas becomes the foundation, the basis from which many weasels issue forth and rise to power. It is as if the pandas empower them through all the power that they inadvertently surrender and sow into the ground. When the pandas become lethargic and sedentary, they allow the weasels to become dynamic and mobile. When the pandas become a one-trick pony (i.e. bamboo eaters), they allow the weasels to become "creative" and capable of multiple "tricks". When the pandas become docile and submissive, they allow the weasels to become aggressive and domineering. Through the vacuum that they create, spiritual pandas empower spiritual weasels to rise up and fill that vacuum. Said another way, the pandas are the basis or pous from which the ailouros weasels emerge.


This explains why the American landscape is currently being overrun by so many weasels. Consider, for example, sub-humans such as nancy pelosi, chucky schumer, and the senile bastard drooling in the White House at the time of this writing. If you hold pictures of their faces up against a close-up picture of a weasel, you will see uncanny similarities, especially in the eyes. Not only do they look like weasels, they have acted like weasels their entire lives, and they are now in the zenith of their power due to the boom in idiotic pandas amongst the American population, even when they are now physically frail and should either be in fast political decline or physically dead. These abounding weasels were able to sneak through the gaping holes in the American political system (idiotically left behind by the Founding Fathers and their modern-day worshippers), and they were able to steal the 2020 election in plain sight of everyone, all without stirring the suspicion of the lethargic pandas. After that, these weasels were able to impose superstitious and unscientific mandates on the population, easily subjecting them to experimental injections that are literally damaging their hearts, neutering their reproductive organs, clotting their arteries, compromising their immune systems, multiplying their cancers, and killing them suddenly.


By the same token, the conformist passivity of the American conservative panda has enabled the constant infiltration of RINOs and demonrat operatives in the highest levels of the Republican Party and its leadership. Weasels such as jared kushner (and his female form ivanka) were even able to sneak into the Trump White House and influence naive Trump's thinking and decisions enough to sabotage him from within and render him incapable of stopping the heavy damage to the American economy and the election theft of 2020. Weasels like those in QAnon were able to infiltrate the minds of a multitude of naive conservative pandas in order to neutralise them by convincing them of magical tales of a national rescue that did not require them acknowledging the fundamental flaws in conservatism, the matriarchal Church, and the Founding Fathers. And, in doing so, these weasels distracted enough conservatives to allow the liberals to carry out their damage.


The Chalcedon nonsense

As we shared above, the giant panda's scientific name includes the Latin word for "cat" that is derived from the Greek word ailouros. Interestingly enough, that word is intricately related in history to a man known as "Timothy Ailuros". To understand his relevance better, we must first consider the historical context around him.


According to, it is believed that, in 42 AD, "Mark the Evangelist" (i.e. the writer of the Gospel of Mark) founded what came to be known as the "Patriarchate of Alexandria" in Egypt, which served as the centre from which Christianity spread to the rest of Egypt (for which reason Mark the Evangelist is traditionally considered the "founder of Christianity in Africa"). As this "see" grew with time, its "main bishop" slowly grew to a "pope"-like status that was held almost on par with the "main bishop" of the other "important" "see", i.e. the "Bishop of Rome". This was the case until 381 AD (some 44 years after Constantine's death), when, in the "First Council of Constantinople", the Church leaders (who apparently had nothing better to do) raised the "Patriarch of Constantinople" to a status above that of the "patriarch" or "main bishop" of Alexandria. Therefore, despite the fact that the term "patriarch" was not commonly used until the 5th century, we can say that, as the Primitive Church degenerated and became increasingly "institutionalised" and "mainstream" (especially after Constantine's "acceptance" of Christianity), it came to see itself under the watch of 3 "popes" or "sees", the one in Rome, the one in Alexandria, and, later, the one in Constantinople.


In 451 AD, according to, the Roman emperor Marcian convoked the "Council of Chalcedon" (the fact that a political figure was convoking the Church to a meeting about its teachings tells you a great deal about how far the Church had fallen by that time). In this Council, held in Chalcedon, Bythinia (in the modern-day Istanbul district of Kadikoy in Turkey), the Church (which, again, had nothing better to do) was trying to re-assert its standing doctrine against the teachings of Nestorius and Eutyches. Even though much of the debate centred around irrelevant theological theorising of no spiritual value, it is worth briefly describing it here for reasons that go beyond what all these theological theorisers were discussing.


Nestorius, who, according to, became bishop of Constantinople in 428 AD, holding the job for 3 years until he was "made redundant" in 431 AD at the Council of Ephesus. He rejected the title "mother of God" that the Church had officially ascribed to Mary, believing that Yeshua was 2 "separate persons" and that only the human Yeshua was in Mary's womb. He fought against the Arian heresy that was prevalent at the time that declared that Christ was a "created being", and he did so by arguing that the Godhead, who is not "created", joined with the human, as when a person enters a tent, to form Yeshua. In other words, Nestorius saw Yeshua as a "merging" of 2 very different natures, almost as if there were 2 persons in Yeshua, the human person born of Mary, and the Godhead Himself, both of whom had merged into one. Many people believe that Nestorius' teachings were misunderstood and that he was not straying from Biblical Christianity but was, instead, trying to ensure that Yeshua's manhood was not lost in His deity and that Mary was not unduly "deified" for having been the woman through whom Yeshua was born.


Nestorius, the bishop of the "see" in Constantinople, was strongly opposed by Cyril, the bishop/patriarch in Alexandria, the other big "see" outside of Rome. Cyril then appealed to Rome and its patriarch, pope Celestine I, who agreed with Cyril and gave Cyril the "authority" to excommunicate Nestorius if he did not change his teachings in 10 days. In the meantime, Nestorius convinced the Roman emperor, Theodosius II, to convoke a council at Ephesus (which, ironically enough, had become a centre of Mary idolatry). Even though the emperor and his wife supported Nestorius, Cyril rallied everyone at the council against Nestorius and worked to ensure a quick excommunication before Nestorius' supporters from Syria could make it to Ephesus. Nestorius was then deposed and exiled. But, after Nestorius' supporters finally arrived and convoked their own council, the emperor ordered both Nestorius and Cyril to be deposed and exiled. Cyril, however, eventually returned from exile and regained his "bishopry" after "donating" a few bribes and after the emperor turned from Nestorius to Cyril in his beliefs. Nestorius remained in exile, ostracised by the Church and the emperor, dying shortly after the Council of Chalcedon in 451 (mentioned above). Even so, support for Nestorius' ideas thrived in the East, especially in Persia, as indicated on


Some 15 years later, in 446 AD, between the time of Cyril's death in 444 and Theodosius II's death in 450, Eutyches emerged with a teaching that opposed Nestorius' but in a more "radical" way. According to, Eutyches believed in what is called "real monophysitism", which declares that Yeshua's divine nature merged with His human nature in such a profound way that it "swallowed it up", like an ocean swallows up a drop of vinegar. In other words, Eutyches believed that Yeshua was made up of 2 natures that had combined into a single nature that was still consistent with the Father's divine nature but was no longer similar to the nature of other humans. This is what led to the Council of Chalcedon in 451, 20 years after the Council of Ephesus, and to the condemnation of both Nestorius and Eutyches. In the Council of Chalcedon, the Church declared that neither Nestorius' 2 distinct "hypostases" (i.e. substances) nor Eutyches' 1 "physis" (i.e. nature) were right but that Yeshua had "2 natures in 1 person (or 'hypostasis')", according to


What Chalcedon missed

Dear reader, if you have reached this section, then you must have somehow made it through the previous section's description of the esoteric and seemingly irrelevant "theological conflicts" that the decaying early Church engaged in. Before proceeding with why we bothered to share all of that, let us first consider the following passage:


"8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. 9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily. 10 And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power:" (Colossians 2:8-10)


Notice how, in the passage above, the Spirit of God speaks of the fulness of the Godhead dwelling bodily in Yeshua, and He does so immediately after speaking of vain human philosophising. It is ironic, therefore, that so much of the Church's vain philosophising in the first half of the 5th century revolved around the divinity of God in Yeshua's human body. Having said this, this writer believes that Nestorius was sincerely trying to tackle a question that God was forcing the Church to face. Nestorius realised that there was something wrong with the pagan-style idolatry that was beginning to revolve around Mary as she began to be called "mother of God", but he knew that he needed to prove the wrongness of that idolatry without denying Yeshua's divinity. He therefore reached the best answer that his heart and mind could come up with, and this writer believes that he was close to getting the answer that God was expecting the Church to find. Unfortunately, people like Cyril were more interested in Church tradition and in politicising the debate to gain power and influence in the decaying "Christian" Church, so he simply reverted the Church to the previous understanding without seeking a new one. Having misinterpreted Nestorius' answer, Eutyches tried to tackle the question again 20 years later, but his answer was even more off than Nestorius', and, yet again, people in the Church who were more interested in "human order" and political gain quashed the debate, leaving the Church in a state of utter darkness from the Council of Chalcedon in 451 to the fateful day in 1517 when Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses on that German church's door. Despite the Protestant Reformation and the 500 years that have transpired since then, the question that God placed before the Church has remained unanswered, at least ty the Church in general, for which reason the latter-rain revival remains on hold and the world around us continues its tragic downward spiral.


This writer believes that the real answer to the question that Nestorius was trying to tackle began to be unveiled as the latter-rain movement began in Vancouver, Canada in 1947, and this writer sincerely believes (in his great arrogance) that this website has provided all the ingredients to give the exact answer that God was waiting to hear from Nestorius and the Church in general as far back as the 5th century. Therefore, this writer can (arrogantly) declare that the answer that God is waiting to be birthed in us is the following:


The error that Nestorius and the others made was in misunderstanding the relationship between man's nature and God's. The Lord God of Israel has declared that He created man in "His image and His likeness" (Genesis 1:26), meaning that God did not create human nature as a "separate entity" that differed from His own nature. In other words, man's nature is a direct reflection or projection of His. He did not make man with some God-like qualities and some other, "non-God" qualities. He made man as an exact projection of His nature. Even animals have qualities in their nature that are projected from God, but animals only have a subset of those qualities, and the qualities that they do have are not always in the same relative "proportion" as God's, meaning that they sometimes have more or less of a certain quality in proportion to the rest of their being than God does. This is why Yeshua could have never taken the form of an animal, for the incompleteness and "disproportion" of an animal's nature would have been unable to contain the "fulness" of the "Godhead" in its body. What, then, is the difference between God and man and how can those differences still allow for the fulness of the "Godhead" to "comfortably" dwell inside a man's body, as a person who fits perfectly into a suit that was tailored for him?


To answer the above, we must first go back to some basic principles that God has had us stress on this website for over 18 years. God declares that man is made up of 3 components, spirit, soul, and body, and the part that makes us unique from animals is the spirit. We can relate to God in a way that animals cannot because God is Spirit (John 4:24), and we have spirits whilst animals only have souls. We can also relate to God in a way that angels cannot because angels have a spirit but no soul, whereas we have both, and God has both (Isaiah 1:14). As we have shared once and again, the spirit part of us is strong and "masculine", whereas the soul part of us is vulnerable and "feminine". And, as we have also shared before, God placed a vulnerable soul in us so that we could reproduce His nature, for reproduction is impossible without vulnerability, and God wanted us to not only be able to reproduce ourselves but also to reproduce His nature. In other words, He desired to reproduce Himself in us. This is why He desires to call us His "sons" and "daughters", where the words "son" and "daughter" are more than exaggerated titles (as when a dog owner says that her dog is her "child"). That reproduction of God's nature in us, however, requires that we go through an unavoidable process where we overcome by allowing the strong spirit nature in us to grow and fully cover our weaker soul nature, submitting it fully to God's Truth and His Nature. Just like a vulnerable child at birth, we start as "living souls" whose spirit is in its infant state and needs to grow in order to fully submit the soul under himself and under God. When man fell, the spirit component in him became fully separated from God and died, leaving man as a soul with some "spirit attributes" but whose spirit, as a whole, remained dormant and unable to develop. When we are born again, that spirit component is revived in us (Ephesians 4:24, Colossians 3:10), and we can restart the process of growing "in the Spirit" until our spirit can fully mature and our soul can show that it is able to remain fully submitted under the Spirit. When we reach that stage, we can manifest Spirit strength when it is required, and we can manifest soul vulnerability when it is required, acting as the Lord God behaves constantly and executing the feats (in Him) that He Himself can execute. The problem is that man has constantly refused to undergo this process because his soul refuses to surrender its dominion, its "queenship" over the things of the Spirit. This is why it is no coincidence that Nestorius' teachings emerged from his instinctive repugnance over the term "mother of God", which he intuitively understood to imply that the soulish, fallen nature of man could claim control of God and the things of the Spirit, like a mother that remains in control of a male child that never grows up to be his own, independent man.


Returning to the original question that troubled Nestorius, we must ask ourselves: How did the only begotten Son of God (John 3:16) become flesh and take the form of the human being we know as Yeshua of Nazareth, and how did the "God" nature interact with the "man" nature? To answer this, we must first remember that man's nature is not inherently different from God's, for we were created in His image and likeness. Natural man is just the nature of God at an earlier stage, a stage from which he must grow into the fulness of what God is and does. We must therefore drop the "2 nature" talk and simply think in terms of the 3 components that God placed in us: our spirit, our soul, and our body. When Yeshua was conceived in Mary's womb, the spirit of God's only begotten Son came into that egg, with Mary providing the body cells in which that Spirit could abide. That, however, leaves a very important question. What about Yeshua's soul? Where did Yeshua's soul come from? Did Mary provide it as well, or did it come from above?


This writer believes that it could not have been provided by Mary, for that would mean that the souls of men are produced by men and women, without the intervention of God. Man and woman may provide elements that shape the soul and give it certain specific qualities, but the soul itself must be breathed in by God, as when God breathed into Adam's nostrils and he became a "living soul" (Genesis 2:7). Once the soul is inside of the egg, it then receives an impartation of qualities from both the father's and the mother's souls. Said another way, the father's and the mother's souls write on the infant's souls as when two people write different things on a piece of paper itself, but God provides the paper, and He decides on the type of that paper's "fabric". If this is the case, did the only begotten Son's soul enter that egg and become Yeshua's soul? If so, we have a "problem". Since we have to accept that the only begotten Son of God "was" before the physical Yeshua "was", we must conclude that He had a soul before Yeshua was conceived (for He could not have been called "Son of God" if He did not have a soul just as the Father does). This means that we can also expect that soul to have become fully mature and fully under the submission of His Spirit. In other words, it would not make sense to think that the Son's soul remained "immature", or in a child-like state, during the entire time prior to the appearance of the man Yeshua on Earth. He was like the Father, with a fully mature and developed soul. However, it was impossible for such a soul to inhabit the egg in Mary's womb, for it would have violated the spiritual laws that God had established for the birth and growth of men. Besides that, the Son needed to go through the full process that all men are called to go through in order to truly be the second Adam and the saviour of men. Hence, we can only conclude that the Son of God did something that seems "unspeakable" when you think about it. He basically had to "empty out" His soul, which, in our paper analogy, is equivalent to erasing everything that had been written on that piece of paper so that His soul could start from scratch. He then had to allow Joseph's soul and Mary's soul to scribble things on that piece of paper, and that is when all the "spiritual inheritance" of Abraham and David was programmed into the Son's soul, for Joseph was a descendant of David and of Abraham. This is when He, in a sense, fulfilled God's promise to Abraham that Mashiach would be called "son of Abraham" and "son of David".


"5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: 6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: 7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: 8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: 10 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; 11 And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father." (Philippians 2:5-11)


The phrase "made himself of no reputation" in verse 7 above is yet another example of how the KJV translators trampled on the original text by introducing their own understanding instead of simply translating what was being said in the original text. That phrase was translated from 2 Greek words, heautou meaning "himself" and kenoo meaning "to empty, make empty". The word kenoo appears in 5 verses of Scripture, and, in 2 of those verses, the KJV translators translated it as "void", in another verse as "made of none effect", and in the other verse as "be in vain":

  • "...for if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void" in Romans 4:14
  • "...for it were better for me to die, than that any man should make my glorying void" in 1 Corinthians 9:15
  • "...not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect" in 1 Corinthians 1:17
  • "...I sent the brethren, lest our boasting of you should be in vain in this behalf" in 2 Corinthians 9:3

Notice how all the other usages of kenoo have a connotation of something being "wasted" or "thrown away", as when someone throws in the trash bin something that he has invested a great deal of time and effort in. Thus, when the Spirit of God uses kenoo in Philippians 2:7, He is saying that the only begotten Son of God basically had to "throw away" all that was in His soul in order to enter the egg in Mary's womb and start again. He had to "flush away" His memories, His emotional soul experiences, His knowledge, His achievements, His emotional depth, all so that He could "fit" into that brand new egg and live out a full human experience in the temporal realm. He then had to allow his "emptied" soul to be imprinted with the faith of Abraham and David through Joseph and the faith of Moses through Mary (who was of the tribe of Levi), and that is how His journey on Earth began.


It is worth clarifying that, by declaring that Yeshua received an impartation from Joseph, we are not implying that Yeshua was physically conceived from Joseph's sperm, for that would have made it impossible for the Son's Spirit to enter that egg. Why? Because Joseph's sperm would have spawned a "dead" spirit separated from God, a spirit under the curse of Genesis 3:17-19, and no human can be born with "2 spirits". Instead, we are saying that Joseph was like a father to Yeshua's soul, but only after the Spirit and the soul of God's only begotten Son had entered the egg. A person's soul and his/her spirit come as a pair and are "conceived" "in the same event" inside the egg. You cannot have a spirit combining with a soul that is unrelated to it inside the same egg. The spirit and the soul come in pairs, with the soul somehow made with "material" from the spirit it is paired with (just as the woman was made by extracting a rib from the man - Genesis 2:21-22). The soul in Yeshua was the same soul that had been in the only begotten Son from the beginning of time, but it was "emptied out" and rewritten with impartations from men such as Abraham, David, and Mosheh through the faithfulness of their descendants Joseph and Mary. We can become "sons" of someone even if we did not receive a physical, biological impartation from them, as when Scripture declares that we, as believers, are "sons of Abraham" even if we are not Jewish. Hence, it is not incorrect to think that Yeshua could receive an impartation from Joseph just by Joseph being a spiritual cover over his bride Mary, even if he did not participate in the physical conception itself. It is through Joseph that the prophecy about Messiah being called "son of David" was fulfilled.


Having said the above, it is also worth emphasising that, when our ancestors "write" things on our "piece of paper" during conception, our paper somehow has the choice of deciding how "impressionable" it will be to those writings. In some papers, the ancestors will be able to etch certain phrases clearly without any problems, whilst, with other phrases, the paper may only allow them to be partially written or written in "blurry handwriting". In the case of Yeshua's "paper", nothing negative from Joseph or Mary would stick on that piece of paper, for it was paper made out of a material not tainted by the fall of man. It was the paper of a soul that had remained submitted to the Spirit from the beginning of time, for which reason the Spirit had the authority to decide what could and could not "stick" on that piece of paper. This is how Yeshua's soul remained free from any human contamination from Joseph or Mary even as it received positive impartations from them.


All that we shared above cannot be discerned if one continues to perceive human nature and God's nature as being inherently "distinct", as distinct, say, as the nature of a domestic cat when compared to that of a lion. A domestic cat can never be the "son" of a lion, and a lion can never be the "son" of a domestic cat, even when lion cubs seem like "adorable kitties" when they are very young. However, man can be called a "son of God", to the point that the only begotten Son of God was able to be a human and have his human suit fit Him like a glove. The only differences between the nature of man and God's Nature are related to process and temporality. In other words, man is on the process of developing the fullness of God's Nature, just as a baby is on the process of developing the fullness of a mature adult. The fact that a tiny baby cannot yet talk or walk does not mean that his nature is inherently "distinct" from that of an adult. He just needs to go through the process to be and do like an adult. Besides the process element, there is also the issue of "temporality". God abides in the eternal realm, even when He can manifest Himself in the temporal realm and even take on human form, as He did when He manifested Himself to Abraham in the form of 3 humans (Genesis 18:1-3) or as when He visited Sodom to destroy it in the form of 2 humans (Genesis 18:20-22, 18:33, 19:1-2). Man is initially "trapped" in the temporal realm, but, as he develops, he can begin to transcend into the eternal realm. And, when his process is complete, he can move between the temporal and eternal realms with fluidity, as Yeshua did after resurrecting (John 20-21). Once you are willing to embrace this spiritual, New-Covenant truth that Yeshua came to reveal and make available to us, the issue of how "God's nature" and "man's nature" could co-exist in Yeshua becomes easier to understand, and the explanation of how Yeshua can be God in the flesh without having to turn Mary into the "mother of God" becomes easier to discern. The Lord God waited for the Church to understand all of this back in the 5th century. He stirred the heart of Nestorius to discern all of this because Nestorius had a righteous indignation over the unholy term "mother of God", but Nestorius fell short because he did not quite understand the "divine" nature of man and was not quite willing "to go there". Instead of taking the challenge and completing what Nestorius had started, the Church decided to shut the whole inquiry down and stick to its limited understanding of Yeshua's nature. Twenty years later, the Church had another chance through Eutyches, but Eutyches went in the opposite direction. Instead of moving forward and completing what was left in Nestorius' journey, he "turned the car around", so to speak, and drove furiously in the opposite direction, arriving at a useless, Hittite destination that brought benefit to no one. Faced with the same question, the Church once again chose to shut down the whole inquiry, thereby officially plunging the Church into 1000 years of complete spiritual darkness until some light finally began to shine through around the time of the Protestant Reformation.


As a parenthesis, it is no spiritual coincidence that the Council of Ephesus (in 431 AD) and the Council of Chalcedon (in 451 AD) were 20 years apart, for it points to what we said earlier in this posting about the Church being given a "do-over" opportunity 20 years later, starting in 2018, to retry the process that had been started in 1998. Unfortunately, just as the Church did worse on its second attempt than it did on its first attempt during the 5th century, the Church is currently performing worse on this second run during the 21st century. In the 5th century, the Church went from birthing the incomplete answer of Nestorius to birthing the distorted answer of Eutyches. In the same way, the 21st century Church is doing worse on every test it is repeating. My heart sinks with sadness as I behold what I am seeing, wondering what the tragic eternal consequences may turn out to be. This writer sincerely believes that there is no possibility of hoping that a future generation many decades from now will finally get it right. It is the bottom of the 9th inning, with 1 out and the bases empty, and we are down 4-2. And, sadly, no one seems aware that the "game" is about to be lost forever and that all the dramatic and permanent sacrifices that God's faithful remnant have made will be callously kenoo-ed like yesterday's rubbish.


God's Vandal judgement

It is interesting to note that in 429 AD, 2 years before the Council of Ephesus, the Vandals (a Germanic tribe, not the punk rock band), who had originally settled in what is now southwestern Poland around 120 BC, entered North Africa. Pushed out from their territories by the Huns, the Vandals began moving westward into parts of the Roman Empire around the start of the 5th century, even establishing themselves in parts of modern-day Galicia and Andalus in Spain. God raised up a king named Gaiseric in 428 who decided to go on a serious offensive against the Romans. According to, Gaiseric was the illegitimate son of King Godigesel and a slave woman. When his father died in 406 during the crossing of the Rhine into the Roman province of Gaul (as indicated on, Gaiseric's half-brother Gunderic became king and continued the Germanic campaign into the Roman province of Hispania. Gunderic died unexpectedly in 428, shortly after trying to seize a church in Hispalis (modern-day Seville) whilst attacking that Roman city. The Vandals then elected Gaiseric as their King, who then decided to leave Spain to the Visigoths, embarking instead on an invasion of Roman-controlled lands in North Africa (as indicated on By 435, 4 years after the Council of Ephesus and the deposing of Nestorius, the Vandals had established control of the Roman territories in modern-day Morocco and northern Algeria, including the city of Hippo (in Algeria), which they sieged for 14 long months, starting in the spring of 430, 1 year before the Council of Ephesus. Interestingly, the famous Church philosopher Augustine died in Hippo during that Vandal siege (according to


By 439, 8 years after the Council of Ephesus, Gaiseric and the Vandals had established a kingdom that included the Roman province of Africa, Sicily, Corsica, Sardinia, Malta, and the Balearic Islands (a Spanish archipelago), according to Hence, we can safely conclude that the Vandals and their unprecedented success over the Romans were God's judgement on the Roman Empire and the Church for their unwillingness to tackle the question that Nestorius had raised and their disinterest in obtaining God's answer to it.


Instead of realising God's dissatisfaction with them, the Church chose to remain on its errant path, and, as we shared above, it dug in its heels when it was given a second chance 20 years later, in the Council of Chalcedon in 451. This is why 4 years later, in 455, God sent the Vandals against Rome, leading to the Vandals sacking Rome and plundering it for 14 days, to the point that the word "vandalism" became associated with the "vile" desecration of precious things. As indicated on, the Vandals had become so dominant over the Romans that the Mediterranean Sea became known in Old English as "Wendelsæ", meaning "Sea of the Vandals". God gave the Vandals the upper hand over Rome and its emperor because the Church's dealings were now being strongly influenced by the Roman emperor (due to the decay that started with Constantine the not-so-great). By the time that Rome was sacked, emperor Theodosius II, who had turned his back on Nestorius and placed his stamp of approval on if-it-ain't-broke-don't-fix-it traditionalism, had been dead for 5 years, having died 1 year before the Council of Chalcedon that spiritually sealed Rome's fate. According to the chronicler Prosper of Aquitane, pope Leo the (not-so-)great received the Vandal king Genseric on 2 June 455 and begged him to only pillage the city but not kill anyone or burn anything down. Apparently, the not-so-anointed words of the "Christian" pope were not enough to dissuade God from executing His judgement on Rome to not only shame Rome but the "Christian" Church system that Rome was now embracing.


Interestingly enough, the Vandals were "Arian" Christians. As indicated on, Arianism was a teaching started by an early 4th-century Christian presbyter from Alexandria, Egypt named Arius, who believed that the Son of God was begotten by God the Father at some point in time, meaning that, to Arius, the Son was not "co-eternal" with the Father. Based on Proverbs 8:22-25, Arianism taught that the Son was created before the creation of the world, and that the Son became the medium through whom everything else was created. To Arianism, the Son became "God" only by the Father's permission and power. Arianism also placed great emphasis on 1 Corinthians 8:5-6, where Paul declares that there is "there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him". Thus, to Arians, the term "God" per se applied only to the Father, and the term "Lord" applied only to the Son. This distinction became important to Arians because, to them, the Father and the Son were of a similar "essence" but not of the same "essence". This was the only way for them to explain why Yeshua declared that "the Father is greater than I" (John 14:28). Ironically, the same book in Scripture that declares that "the Father is greater than" Yeshua also says the following about Him:


"I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world: again, I leave the world, and go to the Father" (John 16:28)


"20 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word; 21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me." (John 17:20-21)


"I and my Father are one" (John 10:30)


"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." (John 1:1)


If the Son and the Father are not of the same "essence", how could the Son have come forth from the Father, and how could the Son and the Father be "One"? How could the Father be in the Son and the Son in the Father? Also, if only the Father can be referred to as "God", how could the Logos (i.e. the Word, or the Son) be "God"? Clearly, understanding what Scripture has to say about the Father and the Son cannot be done with the natural mind. Otherwise, it makes absolutely no sense that the Father is greater than the Son, whilst, at the same time, they are One and One is in the Other and vice versa. Thus, we can say that Arius was attempting to tackle something that was bothering his soul, but he was doing it with a partial understanding, using enough spiritual understanding to detect some things that were true and very worthy of consideration but at the same time allowing his natural understanding to limit the conclusions that he needed to reach from those things. The natural mind cannot reconcile the fractal principles in Scripture that appear to contradict each other and go against earth-bound common sense. Therefore, when faced with 2 "contradictory" spiritual ideas, the natural mind tends to gravitate towards one and discard the other. Instead of asking the Spirit of God for His understanding, the natural mind rejoices at the little understanding it has acquired and digs its heels deeply into the ground, convinced that it has found the truth and that anything that contradicts his understanding can be summarily dismissed.


Had Arius bothered to ask God for wisdom, he would have understood that the Father and the Son are of the same essence and that the Father being "greater" than the Son shows how God, in His perfect nature, can submit to Himself. In other words, God is not a megalomaniac who is in constant demand of worship and submission to Himself but is, instead, capable of doing that which He requires others to do. Being God, He can humble Himself, even to the point of Death and Sheol and can, upon rising from that point, submit Himself to God (the Father), even if He (the Son) is also God. As the Son, God has proved that He can limit Himself within the boundaries of temporal realm and still continue to be God, even when, within those limitations, God (the Father) is greater than Him. God can submit to Himself without worrying about losing His identity as God.


When God declared through Paul that there is one God, the Father, out of whom are all things, and one Lord, Yeshua the Mashiach, through whom are all things (1 Corinthians 8:6), He was not saying that the Father did not have "Lord" qualities and that only the Son had them. Instead, He was emphasising that, if you recognise the Father as the one true God, you will also acknowledge the Lordship of the Son who took the form of the human Yeshua. In other words, you cannot recognise the Father as God if you are unwilling to recognise the supreme Lordship of the man Yeshua, and, not just the historical man Yeshua, but anyone who joins Him in His anointing (which is why 1 Corinthians 8:6 speaks of "Yeshua the Mashiach", since "Mashiach", or "Christos" in Greek, means, "the Anointed One"). If you have any doubts about this, consider the phrase "and we by Him" at the end of 1 Corinthians 8:6:


"5 For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,) 6 But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him." (1 Corinthians 8:5-6)


Said yet another way, the Spirit of God is declaring in 1 Corinthians 8:5-6 that you cannot recognise the divinity of the One True God without recognising the divine Lordship of Man, His Son, when Man is submitted to Him and is willing to go through the spiritual process that He has laid out for him. This is what Arius missed, and this is what Nestorius came close to understanding but missed, and this is what Eutyches didn't even come close to getting, despite his "well-meaning" effort. Instead of rising to the challenge that was being made evident through these men, the Church settled on a mystical and useless understanding, which is why God sent the Vandals against Rome to judge them.


It is interesting to note that, just as with Nestorius and Eutyches, Arius was rejected and dismissed by the Church through a "Council", the Council of Nicaea, a council convoked by the first Roman emperor who started meddling in Church affairs, Constantine the not-so-great, in 325 AD. As indicated on, Constantine was concerned about the division that Arianism was causing within the Church, mainly because of the consequences that it could have on the stability of his empire. He therefore convoked the Council to promote an "official resolution" to the conflict that all Christians would then have to embrace. After the council "surprisingly" condemned Arius and settled on a half-baked understanding of the Father and the Son, Constantine banished Arius (and others) to exile. Instead of allowing believers to execute spiritual judgements, the Church began to rely on earthly leaders with ulterior motives to dictate judgements and sentences for her, thereby proving how low the Church began to fall when Constantine supposedly embraced Christianity and made it the empire's "official religion".


"1 Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints? 2 Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? 3 Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life? 4 If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church. 5 I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you? no, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren? 6 But brother goeth to law with brother, and that before the unbelievers." (1 Corinthians 6:1-6)


From all of the above, we can conclude that, when God sent the Vandals, who were followers of Arius, against the Roman empire, He was declaring that He was judging the Church and Rome for leaving unresolved the issue that Arius had brought up over 100 years earlier. The judgement was so strong that the most militarily powerful empire that the world had arguably seen until that day was taken down by a "wandering" Germanic tribe, a tribe that was able to remain dominant over both halves of the Roman Empire (the Eastern half based from Constantinople and the Western half based from Rome) until the 530s, when Justinian finally broke the Vandals' domination and began the reconquest of many of the territories that the Vandals had taken from the Romans. As indicated on, however, Justinian's victories only led to a partial restoration of the Roman Empire, which was never able to regain the former glory that God had taken away from it through His Vandalic judgement of it. By the same token, the Church never regained the spiritual life that it had before Constantine and before the "Chalcedonian" doctrinal conflicts, slowly entering into a darkness that was not removed until another "Germanic invasion", led by Martin Luther, brought some light back into the darkened Church.


The supplanting weasel

Now that we have shared some historical context on the "Council of Chalcedon" and the bishopry in Alexandria, we can meditate on the spiritual meaning of the man known as "Timothy Ailuros" and his connection to the pandamic to which the world has submitted itself. As we touched on earlier, at the time of Timothy Ailuros, there were 3 "popes" or "patriarchs" in the Church who "oversaw" 3 different "sees", the see in Rome, the see in Alexandria, and the see in Antioch. According to, Timothy Ailuros was elected "pope of Alexandria" in 457, 6 years after the Council of Chalcedon in 451 and 3 years after the previous "pope", Dioscorus of Alexandria, had died. Timothy Ailuros' election was dubious, however, because it was done by those who supported Eutyches and opposed the decrees made in the Council of Chalcedon against him. As it turns out, there was already an "official" "pope" of Alexandria when Timothy Ailuros was elected to that position by his supporters. That "official" "pope" was Proterius of Alexandria, who according to, was appointed by the Council of Chalcedon in 451 to replace Dioscorus, whom they deposed for supporting Eutyches (even though he had supported the Council of Ephesus in 431 and opposed Nestorius). The supporters of Eutyches, however, still saw Dioscorus as the "legitimate pope of Alexandria" (the whole phrase is one big oxymoron, but I hope you know what I mean). This is why, upon his death, the followers of Eutyches elected a new "pope of Alexandria", choosing Timothy Ailuros.


Because of how corrupt the Church had become, some might be led to think that these supporters of Eutyches, Dioscorus, and Timothy Ailuros were "righteous, conscientious objectors" to the corrupt Church system. However, a brief examination of Dioscorus bears out that he was a morally corrupt and opportunistic weasel who was willing to kill and cheat to rise through the ranks and become more powerful. As indicated on, he presided over the Second Council of Ephesus in 449, a meeting convoked by emperor Theodosius II through the influence of a court official who was the godson of Eutyches, meaning that the Council was birthed from political manipulations worthy of third-world countries. During the Council, Dioscorus manoeuvred things to ensure a reinstatement of Eutyches, who had been exiled in 448, and proceeded to have Flavian, the man responsible for Eutyches' exile, brutally beaten, imprisoned, and then exiled. The physical assault on Flavian was so severe that he died from his injuries 3 days after being deposed. Dioscorus also ensured the deposing of several other bishops opposed to Eutyches during that Council. Naturally, Leo I was not pleased with the council, calling it a "robber synod" and declared its decisions null and void. This triggered Dioscorus to attempt a coup on Leo I by getting 10 bishops to sign a letter excommunicating Leo I. Sadly, the emperor Theodosius supported the "robber synod's" decision until he died in 450, at which time his sister Pulcheria took over power, making an officer named Marcian her consort and emperor. Marcian and Pulcheria consulted with Leo and convoked a new Council, the Council of Chalcedon, and exiled Eutyches to Syria. Hence, we can see from all of the above that Dioscorus and Eutyches' supporters were a gang of weasels that used the most unrighteous political tactics to gain control of the Church and become more powerful. It is sad to consider that, a mere 400 years after the Lord's ascension, the Church had become so corrupt that unsaved and morally corrupt weasels such as Dioscorus and others were in positions of high power within the Church hierarchy.


Because the church in Alexandria was mostly anti-Chalcedonian, Proterius was not well-received and endured much opposition, leading to the "on-the-side commissioning" of Timothy Ailuros as the "real pope of Alexandria" (again, a huge oxymoron of a phrase). As indicated on, Proterius was eventually murdered in 457. The "pro-Chalcedonians" say that he was murdered by a mob that was instigated by Timothy Ailuros, whilst the "anti-Chalcedonians" say that he was simply murdered by the Byzantine General in charge of Egypt during a heated argument (as indicated on This writer, however, leans towards the first version, and, whether Proterius was murdered by a mob or the Byzantine general, it was definitely at Timothy Ailuros' behest. As a side note, it is worth mentioning that this conflict over who was the real "pope of Alexandria" in 451 marked the split between the "Coptic Orthodox" church and the "Greek Orthodox" church. The "Coptic" church considers the weasels Dioscorus and Timothy Ailuros to be the continuation of the "legitimate line of popes" (again, an oxymoronic phrase), whilst the Greek Orthodox see Proterius as part of the "legitimate line".


Even though Timothy Ailuros was able to exercise his illegitimate "popehood" in Alexandria for a while (due to the Alexandrian church's support), emperor Leo I expelled him from Alexandria in 460 (3 years after he had taken over). However, after Leo's death in 474 and a short stint by Leo II (who died that same year at the age of 7), Flavius Zeno, Leo II's father and husband of Leo I's daughter, became emperor. He was then overthrown in a weaselly coup by Basiliscus (as indicated on After quickly losing the support of the people because of heavy taxes and other policies, "emperor" Basiliscus tried to regain popularity by reinstating Timothy Ailuros as "pope of Alexandria" in 475. Timothy Ailuros then remained as "pope" until his death a couple of years later, in 477. By that time, Zeno had overthrown the overthrower Basiliscus and had sent an officer to summon Timothy Ailuros, but Timothy Ailuros told the officer, "The emperor shall not see my face" and immediately fell ill and perished. Thus, it is possible that Timothy Ailuros poisoned himself to weasel his way out of being "made redundant" again, using death as a way to "perpetuate" his place in the (meaningless) line of "Alexandrian popes".


It is also worth noting that, as all of this was happening on the "eastern front" of the Roman Empire, the western half in Rome was experiencing another sort of overthrow. In 476, the soldier and statesman of Germanic background, Flavius Odoacer overthrew the emperor Romulus Augustulus, who had taken over the year prior at around the age of 10 after his predecessor Julius Nepos (who had just taken over in 474) was overthrown in a coup. As indicated on, Nepos was quickly weakened by the fact that he was unable to defeat the (Germanic) Visigoths in Gaul, and he was also weakened by the weaselly overthrow of emperor Zeno in the eastern part of the Roman Empire, since Nepos had been able to take over as western emperor with Zeno's strong support (NB: the Roman Empire began having 2 well-defined emperors from 395 onwards as a way to manage the extensive empire). Eventually, Nepos was forced to flee to his birthplace of Dalmatia but continued to claim the emperorship from exile as a man named Orestes placed his young son Romulus Augustulus as a figurehead emperor, with Orestes being the one actually in charge. In 476, the "barbarian" foederati (i.e. non-Roman troops allied to Rome) began to demand Italian lands to settle on, but Orestes refused. This led to Odoacer rallying the foederati against Rome, which concluded with Orestes' death and the deposing of Romulus as emperor. Since Romulus was a young child, Odoacer did not kill him, allowing him to "retire" to a fortress in Campania, Naples, and little is known about his life after that. As indicated on, the fall of Romulus is considered by historians as the official end of the Western Roman Empire as well as the end of "Ancient Rome". Many also consider it the official beginning of the Middle Ages. This is how deep God's judgement against the Church and the Roman Empire was due to its inability to correctly answer the spiritual question that He had raised through Nestorius, and through Arius many decades earlier. Interestingly, just like the Vandals, Odoacer was also a devout Arian Christian, which was God's way of saying,

"The issue you were unable and unwilling to tackle decades ago did not simply go away, and I have made it come back to take you down"


After deposing Romulus, Odoacer established what came to be known as the "Kingdom of Italy". Even though he did not take the title of "emperor", he was the one who, for all intents and purposes, was in charge of what had been the Western Roman Empire, all the time retaining the full support of the Roman Senate. During his time in power, he represented himself as the "client" of Zeno, the (eastern) emperor in Constantinople, and he paid lip service to Julius Nepos, the emperor who had been overthrown by Romulus' father. When Nepos was murdered in 480 in Dalmatia, Odoacer responded by invading Dalmatia to punish the murderers, executing them promptly. Interestingly, Zeno's top "general", Illus asked Odoacer for help to overthrow Zeno in Constantinople in 484, and Odoacer agreed to help, invading Zeno's westernmost provinces. Given this "treachery" by Odoaster, Zeno turned against him, inciting the Rugii (a Germanic people in present-day Austria) to attack Italy. However, the Rugii were no match for Odoacer, who invaded their territory and defeated them soundly. Zeno then turned an old and nagging Germanic rival, the Ostrogoth Theodoric the "Great", against Odoacer by proclaiming him "king of Italy". With this support, Theodoric invaded Italy in 489 and was able to drive Odoacer out of Rome, who then took refuge in the city of Ravenna. Theodoric then came against Ravenna, forcing it to surrender in 493, after which Theodoric extended an "olive branch" to Odoacer, inviting him to a "reconciliation banquet". Trusting Theodoric's sincerity, Odoacer attended the banquet and was promptly murdered there by Theodoric.


At this point, some of you (at least the ones who have made it this far into this posting) may be wondering, "Why is he telling us all of this? What spiritual benefit is there in learning all these historical facts?". Even though this writer believes that there are many spiritual truths hidden in all these details, the main reason why God is prompting us to write all of this is to show the level of "weaselry", backstabbing, and usurpation that was prevalent during the time surrounding the Council of Chalcedon. As we shared earlier, the word ailuros can be translated as both "cat" and "weasel", showing how, when a "pandamic" is allowed by the people to break out, weasels begin to appear everywhere. As described above, Timothy Ailuros was able to usurp the title of "pope of Alexandria" not just once but twice, in 457 and almost 20 years later, in 475, dying 2 years later in 477, exactly 20 years after 457. At the same time, both halves of the Roman Empire experienced constant coups, with supplanting weasels rising once and again to take power at the slightest opportunity. Thus, it is not a coincidence that, in the midst of the 2020 pandamic, the demonrats were able to carry out a coup against Trump, using weaselly tactics to steal the election and place a supplanter, a senile and clueless paedophile, in his place.


As evidenced by all that we studied above regarding Rome and the Councils of Nicaea, Ephesus, and Chalcedon, these weasel-begetting pandamics do not arise from "happenstance". They arise from God's people being unwilling to tackle foundational questions placed by God, choosing instead to settle for band-aid, "if-it-ain't-clearly-broke-don't-fix-it" answers that prevent God's people (and the world) growing into the dimensions that God has intended for her (and the world). Curiously enough, the "unanswered question" that led to this pandamic is the same question that the Church of the 4th and 5th centuries left unanswered. That question revolves around the difference between God's nature and man's nature. The latter-rain revival that is prophesied in Scripture shall only come when the Church finally admits that the difference is not one of "essence" or "quality" but a difference in "stages". In other words, man's nature is intended to progress into the fullness of God's nature. God intends for all men to be "Emmanuels", God in the flesh. We were called to be One with God Himself, which implies embracing the fullness of His "male" Spirit nature. As long as the Church remains determined to stay matriarchal, controlled by pastors and the soul, trapped in Old-Covenant paradigms, it will remain in the centre of God's ever-increasing wrath, and the enemy's destruction will only get worse and worse. By the same (parallel) token, as long as American conservatives continue to ignore God's foundational challenges against their "beloved" Constitution and their idols the Founding Fathers, the political and social situation in America will only get worse, and America's calling will die just as latin america's did 19 years ago, in 2003. America has less than 18 months to respond, to show a sign of repentance, a sign of life, before God permanently kills her. With each passing day, the hope in my heart becomes dimmer and dimmer, for I simply do not see the American Church and American conservatives showing any legitimate sign of change. This writer continues to pray for Trump's early death (by a jab-induced heart attack during a rally whilst criticising the Iraq war and Ukraine). That may be the trigger for change, but even that might not be enough to awaken the Church and conservatives out of their panda-like stupor. Meanwhile, God's debt clock against America continues to tick down to zero, and the American Church (and conservatives) remain unaware that they owe God anything or that God is about to foreclose on the whole American experiment.