Matthew 24 - The Overview (Part 2)

• The word "then" was translated from tote, which has a strong time connotation
  • ⇒ What the Lord declares in verse 23 and subsequent verses happens after what is described in the previous verses
  • ⇒ It describes things happening during the 5th-seal Jebusite-Hittite onslaught against God's remnant
• The words "here" and "there" were translated from the same Greek word meaning "here" ⇒ One "here" refers to falsehood from the Jebusite "right" side and the other "here" to falsehood from the Hittite "left" side

• "False Christs" point to the matriarchal first beast, and "false prophets" point to the matriarchal second beast
  • The false prophets endeavour to re-establish the dominion of the "false Christ" demigods that the remnant mortally wound through their 4-horse gallop
  • The false prophets are the enemy's equivalent of John the Baptist, and the false Christs are the enemy's equivalent of Yeshua
• "Signs" are manifestations that defy the pre-conceived understanding of particular people; they happen on "earth", meaning that they happen at ground level, targeting a specific group of people
• "Wonders" are events of a large magnitude that impact a great number of people, portraying the prowess of the one carrying out the wonder
• Signs and wonders will be performed by the matriarchal system in an effort to prove that the remnant have not damaged it and that it is alive and well
  • These signs and wonders will tempt the remnant to believe that the matriarchal system is unbeatable
  • Evil signs during the 5th seal are performed mostly by the second beast of Revelation 13
  • Evil wonders during the 5th seal are performed mostly by the matriarchal first beast of Revelation 13
  • The remnant perform spiritual signs and wonders of their own, which led to the matriarchal system's weakened state
    • ⇒ There is a battle of signs and wonders in the spirit realm between the remnant and the matriarchal during the end-times
• Yeshua's mention of the "elect" means that the faithful disciples who are close to Him are still around when all of this is happening, which, as the word "then" in the previous verse indicates, is not before the period of great tribulation, thereby disproving once again the notion of an escapist, matriarchal "rapture"
  • The non-elect are already deceived, and they are comfortable where they are
  • Therefore, these false Christs and prophets will include "avant-garde" men and women who go beyond the traditional, stale understanding of the matriarchal Church, thereby attracting remnant or quasi-remnant believers who know that there is more to Christianity than what the matriarchal Church has to offer; unfortunately, these false Christ and prophets go only halfway between the matriarchal Church and God's perfect truth, adding enough elements in their teaching and preaching to be different, but not different enough to call out the matriarchy of the soul and bring about the dominion of the Spirit
  • These false Christs and prophets will also include non-believers who will feign some sort of allegiance to legitimate change but who are at heart more interested in Korah-style revolution to quench the rise of the Spirit for good; they will carry out great "feats" and win impressive victories against the remnant, causing the remnant to question themselves (like obastard's unbelievable 2 election wins despite a shady past and a reign mired in ineptness, corruption, and decay)

• The words "told" and "before" were translated from proereo, which refers to a prophetic flow that looks out into the future beyond what is visible
  • ⇒ Overcoming the deception described in Matthew 24:24 requires a great deal of prophetic awareness; it cannot be done with natural or traditionalistic understanding
• The word "behold" was translated from idou, which refers to the eyes of the conscious mind
  • ⇒ We must make an effort to remind our minds that the soul matriarchy's apparent victory is but a spiritual mirage by going back to Yeshua's written words and discerning them prophetically
  • By refocusing our mind on Yeshua's prophetic warning, we can snap out of the trance of disheartening that the enemy's signs and wonders may inflict upon us
• Besides being a double-witness for the Jebusite-Hittite great tribulation of God's people, the word proereo also points to the following in Scripture:
  • A remnant on the verge of extinction (à la Sodom and Gomorrah) that is prophesied to survive through Jehovah Sabaoth, the Lord of Hosts (Romans 9:27-29)
  • People willing to go through great sacrifice and who suffer 5th-seal Jebusite "fightings without" and Hittite "fears within" (2 Corinthians 7:1-5)
  • People who die in weakness and apparent irrelevance but who resurrect in power later and are vindicated before those who doubted them (2 Corinthians 13:1-6)
  • People who are warned about heeding a false message (Galatians 1:6-9)
  • Remnant believers who, after sacrificial green-horse death, are in a waiting period, waiting for the enemies to be put under their footstool, because they received and believed the prophetic word about them living under the New Covenant, not the Old Covenant of hierarchies and spiritual limitation (Hebrews 10:12-18)

• The "desert" refers to places where people separate themselves for a soulish type of "purity" whilst remaining with an uncircumcised flesh
  • These are "right-handed" places where a Jebusite spirit and Jebusite wisdom lurk beneath
• The "secret chambers" are places where you go to "enjoy God" in pseudo-intimacy that goes nowhere, places geared towards spiritual experiences to store up self-satisfaction
  • These are "left-handed" places where a Hittite spirit lurks underneath
• These 2 types of places emphasise a message of village enclosure that aims to prevent all believers, including remnant-leaning believers, realising that they are called to (spiritually, not soulishly) conquer and retake the Earth unto God
  • The "deserts" enforce Perizzite (i.e. poor villager) enclosure
  • The "secret chambers" enforce Hivite (i.e. "rich" villager) enclosure
  • Through this village enclosure, the "Jesus is coming to take us home in the rapture" notion is reinforced and believers continue to think that they need to be like people gathered on the right rooftops waiting for the helicopter to come and rescue them of this "filthy" earth
• If we are to take Yeshua's end-time prophetic word in a literal way, as the eschatological parrots are so determined to do, are we to conclude that Yeshua is speaking about literal deserts and literal secret chambers or "closets"? Is a place OK if it is not located in a literal desert or closet? Dear reader, how stupid do believers have to be to take Yeshua's words literally without realising that He is speaking prophetically? If words such as "desert" and "secret chambers" are not to be taken literally, why is every other word in Matthew 24 (such as "Judaea") to be taken so literally? Again, the matriarchal Church is very adept at selective acceptance of God's words, accepting what is easy to their souls and passively rejecting what is not. Instead of realising that they must make an effort to unearth the true meaning of what Yeshua is saying, they prefer to simply accept whatever can somehow be taken literally and relegating to "irrelevant poetic figures" whatever they know cannot be taken literally.

• Contrary to the Church's self-enclosed manifestations of the Christ, the Lord's manifestation is invasive and violent, as shown by the use of "lightning" (astrape) in Scripture
• The phrase "from east to west" speaks of an iterative process, not an instant flash, as when the sun rises in the east and gradually takes over the entire sky
• "From east to west" also means "from right to left", which means that His manifestation starts with God's foundation of righteous apostolic judgements and then goes into full-blown prophetic, from judgements to righteous grace, covering and penetrating into every spectrum of the human experience

• The carcass speaks of those who draw the coming of the Lord through their green-horse death. Again, the Lord's Coming is not a mere matter of sitting back whilst we idly wait for Yeshua to "do His thing" in order to "get us out of here" and regenerate the Earth through His magical power. Matriarchals hide their spiritual sloth behind the refrain, "Jesus did everything on the cross; all that is left for us is to receive". Cursed are those who refuse to break away from this vile mindset.
• If we are to believe the eschatological parrots' understanding of Matthew 24, what meaning can the "carcass" have? Again, matriarchals are prone to relegating these verses to "irrelevant poetic figures of speech", shielding themselves from the responsibility of having to inquire in the Spirit to gain true understanding
• If we are to treat this verse as a mere "poetic figure of speech", why would Yeshua use a "carcass" as a figure of His coming? Wouldn't He rather use a more "positive" symbolism, given that His Coming is supposed to bring life to the Earth, not death?

• Sadly, when the Church's eschatological parrots read the words above, their literal, anti-prophetic minds immediately associate it with meteorological events, with no interest in understanding the true meaning behind it.
  • If they are right, are we to expect atmospheric turbulence of some sort that will darken the sun for many days, or are we to expect eclipses happening in unprecedented succession (throwing the solar system into chaos)? Are we also to expect these events to also affect the moon?
  • If so, should we also expect the star Alpha Centauri to come crashing into the Earth, given that the verse literally says that the stars will fall from heaven (notice that it does not simply say that the stars will stop shining)? If Alpha Centauri and other stars are expected to come crashing down, shouldn't these collisions signify the end of the planet and the entire solar system, given the actual sizes of stars, most of which are orders of magnitude larger than the sun, which is itself a giant when compared to the Earth?
  • "Oh, no!!", the matriarchals would quickly shout. "Clearly, the stars falling is figurative since we know how big stars are!!" If so, matriarchal, why is that the only part of the verse that must be taken "figuratively" whilst we can expect the other parts to be fulfilled in a very literal sense?
  • Faced with the undeniable reality of that question, some matriarchals may want to save face by claiming that Jesus must have meant that satellite parts, and maybe even the International Space Station, would start falling from the sky. However, there is currently only one Space Station out there whose fall would be newsworthy, and the fall of satellites has happened often enough since Sputnik not to be newsworthy.
  • Faced with the above, other matriarchals may want to argue that Jesus was speaking of meteors crashing into the Earth. Again, this has happened off and on throughout history, so we would have to assume that God is planning to send a barrage of meteors that will come crashing into the Earth, with the meteors frequent enough to be newsworthy but small enough not to wipe out life on Earth.
  • Even if we were to accept this half-literal, half-figurative option, what would it truly benefit us to have that information in our heads? If a believer plans to make it out of this cruel world on the "Rapture" spacecraft, what use is it to me to know technical details such as "the sun will be darkened", "the moon will stop shining", and "meteors will fall from the sky"? To me, all those details would be irrelevant and could be summarised in the phrase "all hell will break loose". If the "gruesome details" are intended to motivate me not to miss the "Rapture Beam-up", then I would be more interested on knowing what I have to do to stay in the Rapture Flight Manifest, but this is something the eschatological parrots are very sparse on. If all Christians automatically make it into the "Rapture Flight Manifest", are Jesus' "gruesome details" intended to produce an "I told you so" effect on those who are "left behind" and have to watch these gruesome events? If so, I would dare to argue that anyone who refuses to convert to Christianity even after witnessing the literal rapture of hundreds of millions of people from the Earth will be too stubborn to then be swayed by Matthew 24:29.
  • In short, to take Yeshua's words as literal descriptions inevitably reduces them to purposeless gibberish, to meaningless trivia for the morbose mind. When we follow the path of the matriarchal parrots, the only usefulness for Yeshua's words is to win Bible "knowledge" games and nothing more.
  • Yes, there can be (and usually are) natural, literal manifestations of God's prophetic word, but these are intended as signs to point to the underlying spiritual meaning, the one that actually counts and has eternal effects on people's growth and lives
• The word "immediately" was translated from euthos, which is derived from euthys meaning "upright, true, sincere"
  • ⇒ It speaks of a spiritual outpouring coming down unhindered by man, straight from heaven above
• The word "after" was translated from meta, which can also be translated as "according to"
  • What is described in the second part of the verse is a "response in kind" to all the tribulation inflicted on the remnant through the first 5 seals of the Apocalypse
• God's response to Cain, Balaam, and Korah:
  • The darkened sun refers to Cain's (the 2nd-seal enemy's) influence being disabled
  • The moon not giving her light refers to Balaam's (the 3rd-seal enemy's) influence being neutralised
  • The stars falling from heaven refers to Korah (the 4th-seal enemy) falling from heaven
• The powers of the heavens being shaken speaks of how the matriarchal system will lose its hold of the resources that it has kept away from God's remnant, meaning that there will be a spiritual transfer of wealth
  • This is the 6th-seal manifestation of God's vindicating vengeance
  • The shaking happens immediately after the 4th-seal and green-horse death and continues through the 5th seal, but it has its full manifestation until the 6th seal
  • The 5th seal waiting period is reflected in the spiritual "regression" into groaning intercession that happens in chapter 62 of Isaiah after describing the shining of God's light on Earth in Isaiah 60 and 61
  • As shown in Isaiah 62:8-10, the 5th-seal period is one of "gathering out the stones" that are hindering His manifestation
• The first seal is not explicitly referred to in this verse because the first-seal epiphany happens deep in the hearts of believers, away from the natural view of man
  • Implicitly, the first seal is represented in the word "immediately", pointing to the "instant" nature of the first-seal, white-horse epiphany
• The darkening of soulish light described in Matthew 24:29 points to the locusts released by God on the 5th angel's trumpet in Revelation (Revelation 9:1-5)
  • The word for "smoke" in Revelation 9:1-5 was translated from kapnos, which is constantly used in Scripture to refer to God and His righteousness
    • ⇒ The locusts of Revelation 9:1-5 are a manifestation of God's righteousness and judgements
    • ⇒ They are agents of God, not "daemons", as the matriarchal Church so often claims; it makes sense that the anti-judgement matriarchal Church, which is unaware of God's righteous nature, would be quick to demonise God's righteous agents of judgement, especially when they are a representation of the remnant that they have endeavoured so hard to repress and whose manifestation they so abhor
  • The judgement inflicted by the 5th-trumpet locusts of Revelation 9:1-5 is the "5th-seal payback" from God and His remnant for the suffering through which the matriarchal system has subjected the remnant for 5 seals, especially during the 4th- and 5th-seal stages
  • Unlike what the matriarchal parrots claim, the "fallen angel" of Revelation 9:1 who holds the "key to the bottomless pit" is not satan, as clearly evidenced by Revelation 20:1-3
  • Also, the word for "key" in Revelation 9:1, kleis, is never used in Scripture in a negative sense; instead, keys are always given to the righteous; there is only one case in Scripture where a key is held by the unrighteous, but it is because they are endeavouring to withhold it from the righteous and do not intend to use it themselves because using it would mean unleashing God's righteousness and judgements into the Earth and ending the reign of the soul on Earth (Luke 11:52)
  • The word aggelos ("angel") and pipto ("fall") in Revelation 9:1 reveal that the fallen star described there refers to believers who worship God, willing to fall to the point of death, and who, as burning lamps, manifest the nature of God Himself. Such believers are strong angels that are willing to die as weak men to enable the multiplication of God's nature on Earth.
• The darkened sun is a reference to what red-horse (2nd-seal) Abel does to the Girgashite sun of Cain, the visible leadership that reigns supreme until Abel appears on the scene and reveals its oppressive Jebusite nature, weakening its hegemony in a mighty way
  • In the natural realm, it is also a reference to what happens to God's remnant, for the sun of God's righteousness is darkened when Cain murders red-horse Abel to silence the burgeoning of God's transformational wisdom
• The moon that does not give her light is a reference to the believers who follow Balaam as they spiritually wander through the wilderness during the black-horse (3rd-seal) stage
  • In the natural realm, it is also a reference to what happens to God's remnant as they are forced to wander in the dark night of black-horse anonymity, stripped of human validation and covering; devoid of natural light in the moonless night, the remnant are compelled to rely on the Lord's "invisible" prophetic light; and, as they do, their discernment begins to grow and grow, learning to discern the season, like Issachar
  • During the black-horse stage, the remnant experience God's "moonlight mercy", a subtle mercy that does not appear to radically change one's external circumstances of "poverty" but which sustains you and enables you to keep getting wealthier and wealthier spiritually
• The falling stars from heaven are a reference to Korah and his followers as they decay into brazenly soulish sub-humans during the green-horse (4th-seal) stage
  • The falling stars point to how matriarchal believers are unripe figs (olynthos) that fall off the tree and do not complete their maturation process due to their Canaanite rejection of God's growth-inducing judgements
  • These unrighteous stars fall as they are shaken in a fundamental way (seio) by the spiritual work of God's green-horse remnant
  • In Scripture, the 2 times when stars (aster) fall (pipto) in the plural, they are unrighteous stars. The 2 times that they fall in the singular, they are righteous stars. All 4 times, the fall of a star or stars happens in the context of the green horse.
  • As the green-horse riders fall in loneliness to Death and Sheol, they complete the work of exposing the Church's Korah leaders as naked emperors who are clearly fallen and are completely unaligned with God's plans, leaders who are, in truth, defenders of the world's soul system that they claim to be against
• The powers of the heavens being shaken refers to the 6th seal, during which time the matriarchal system shall lose its grip on the physical and emotional resources in human affairs; those resources shall come under the control of God and His remnant, and the Kingship of the Spirit shall be manifest in the affairs of men
  • During the black-horse stage, Balaam and his followers use the evangelistic endowment to "shake down" (saleuo) the spirit realm in order to extort natural, unripe wealth from it. This is why God will shake them down as well, and all the material wealth and emotional power that they and the Korah-ites possess shall be drastically stripped from them and come under the possession of the righteous, for the poor shall inherit the Kingdom of Heaven

• The sign of the son of man points to Luke 11:30 and to Jonah, which in turn speaks of the subtle resurrection of a man who, by all appearances, looks as "normal" and "human" as the next man, yet he possessed an invisible anointing that struck fear into an entire mega-city by his mere presence
• The fact that the sign is in heaven means that it will be manifested in the spirit realm first, just as Jonah when he emerged from the fish's belly in a deserted beach outside of the view of all
• The "tribes" (phyles) refer to the 12 racial groups that humanity is divided in; these tribes create spiritual fortresses for unrighteousness on Earth by creating value systems and parameters of behaviour
• When Jonah appeared in Nineveh, he caused the entire city to mourn on account of the unrighteousness that their culture had so strongly defended, i.e. the unrighteousness that they had embraced as a tribe; this is the type of mourning described in Matthew 24:30
• The "cloud" speaks of God's favour for the remnant, just like the cloud that enveloped Yeshua in Matthew 17:1-5
• The son of man coming with power speaks of resources being in full possession of the remnant, taken back from the matriarchals who have hoarded them
• The son of man coming with great glory means that the remnant will manifest the Glory of God in the flesh
• Notice how, if you understand this verse literally, the phrase "sign of the son of man in heaven" becomes meaningless; with a literal mindset, that phrase means little more than a giant Jesus visibly appearing in the sky, making the word "sign" meaningless, as well as the deeper meaning of the verse becoming hidden

• If this is the "rapture" that the matriarchal Church is waiting for, why is it happening until now, after the Lord's description of the great tribulation and His appearance for all to see? Wasn't the "rapture" supposed to precede the great tribulation, followed several years later (3.5 for some, 7 for others) by the Lord's appearance in the sky? Doesn't this verse and the verse that follows in Matthew 24 actually contradict the eschatological parrots' sequence of events?
• This verse is indeed talking about the rapture of 1 Thessalonians 4, but not in the way that the matriarchal Church understands it
• The key to understanding this verse is in the phrase "gather together", which was translated from the Greek verb episynago, the verb form of episynagoge, which speaks of the gathering of believers as spirit beings in the heavenly places above the Earth
• Every church gathering on Sunday should be turning into an episynagoge of spirit beings shaking the spirit realm and transforming the Earth unto God. But, because of the matriarchy, these episynagoges are few and far between, outside of man's natural view, and do not include many believers; Matthew 24:31, however, speaks of these episynagoges becoming generalised and fully manifested before all
• Also, why does the Lord say that "His elect" will be gathered together? Doesn't that imply that not all believers will be "raptured up"? Otherwise, why doesn't He say something more blasé and matriarchal like "they shall gather together those who have prayed the prayer of salvation and believed in Me"?
• The word "elect" was translated from eklektos, and it refers to those whom God has evaluated and called out from within the Church because they were found not to have bowed their knee to the matriarchal system; passing this evaluation (i.e. judgement) requires a willingness to embrace God's judgements, which is inherently anti-matriarchal
• The word "sent" was translated from apostello, which points to the apostolic, judgement nature of the angels' gathering
• The word "winds" in "4 winds" was translated from anemos, which points to the soul and to the contamination that the soul matriarchy has inflicted on the development of the 4 spiritual Faces in mankind ⇒ As the gathering of Matthew 24:31 happens, the 4 spiritual Faces of man shall be liberated from their subjugation to the soul system
• Angels are believers acting like "soulless spirits" (Luke 22); contrary to the matriarchal Church's literal understanding of Scripture, these "angels" are not non-human creatures that exist independently of the human race; instead, these "angels" are the faithful avant-garde believers who were able to break away from the matriarchy and who have been gathering in solitude in the episynagoges until now; at the end of days, however, these angels will be empowered to gather their other brethren in the Body who have been "elected" because they did not allow their hearts to be so contaminated by the matriarchy that they became permanently rejected by God
• You start on your path to being an "angel" when you heed God's red-horse shout to separate yourself from the matriarchal Church system; as you go through the black-horse stage, you develop your "sound" (phone), and as you go through the green-horse stage, you develop your "trumpet" (quavering salpigx), meaning that the great sound of your trumpet comes from you having gone through the black- and green-horse stages; the matriarchals, however, are expecting a humongous trumpet to appear in the sky that will be played, blasting a deafening literal sound across the Earth! How sad!
• As these angels sound the great sound of the trumpet, the impartation within them will be "instantly" imparted to the elect, allowing them to experience accelerated growth in the black- and green-horse stages without having to go through the same suffering that these lonely angels had to go through

• The matriarchal Church sees the "fig tree" as nothing more than a figure of the literal nation of Israel, but, in truth, it represents way more than that
• In Scripture, the fig tree points to the apostolic Lion Face of Wisdom and Judgements
  • ⇒ Yeshua is referring to the sprouting forth of a special kind of wisdom on Earth
• The word "tender" was translated from hapalos, which points to the word hapallotrioo, which, in turn, speaks of alienation
  • ⇒ The "tender" fig tree refers to vessels who suffer great alienation from the matriarchal world around them because they operate on a very different mindset of righteous judgements, making them "tender", i.e. vulnerable to much attack and terrible isolation, but full of God's wisdom sap
• The word "branches" was translated from klados, which is derived from klao meaning "to break"; all 15 times it appears in Scripture, it is used to refer to the breaking of bread
  • ⇒ These fig trees will be broken in sacrifice because they go around "breaking" and "dividing" through their judgements. But, through those divisive apostolic judgements and their prophetic sacrifice in being broken, they will forge a unity of the Spirit unlike anything the soul can produce
• The word "leaves" was translated from phyllon, which is derived from phyle meaning tribe; phyle is used 24 out of 31 times in Scripture to refer to some or all of the tribes of Israel
  • ⇒ This fig tree will have a strong impartation of the God of Israel. This correlates with what the eschatological parrots say when they equate the fig tree with Israel. However, this connection points to something much deeper: this latter-day fig tree will have a strong impartation of the God of Israel, meaning that they will have a strong awareness of the warrior- and judgement-nature of the "male" God of war (Exodus 15:3). This means that they will have a strong "angelic" anointing of judgement-making apostle and warrior evangelist (Hebrews 12:25-29).
• The word "summer" was translated from theros, which is very similar to theristes meaning "reaper"
  • ⇒ Summer speaks of God's harvest: the separation of what is soulish from what is spiritual, both of which are often blended together because they are so similar to the undiscerning heart and mind
• The word "summer" also points to the rise in heat that is uncomfortable to the soul because of its judgement nature, prompting the matriarchy to attack the remnant, just like the viper did against Paul in Malta
• The word "nigh" was translated from eggys, which points to Romans 10:8 and the proactive seizing of the day by launching prophetic rhema in our apostolic-evangelistic angel nature
  • ⇒ It speaks of a remnant executing angelic actions under a prophetic anointing

• The word "see" was translated from eido, which speaks of seeing with the natural mind; the word "know" was translated from ginosko, which speaks of knowing with the heart
  • There is a need to do a translation from mental understanding to heart understanding; this is the translation that eschatological parrots fail to make once and again as they try to "interpret" Yeshua's end-time words
• If the Church's version of the rapture is real, why would Yeshua say, "when you shall see all these things"? Doesn't that imply that God's faithful believers will see the entire storyline delineated in all the preceding verses play out? if the Church's version of the rapture was real, wouldn't Yeshua instead have said, "when you begin to see these things", know that the end is near?
• The word "doors" was translated from thyra, which points to ...
  • ... death and resurrection &
  • ... the "village" Spirits of God (Philadelphia and Laodecia), the Spirits that are not conferred as birth endowments but are "seized" through the heart

• This verse once again proves how eschatological parrots have to "stretch" Scripture to make it fit their eschatological (mis)understanding. If we are to take Yeshua's words as literally as the parrots do, we should take the word "this" literally. Remember, Yeshua was speaking, not writing to His audience. The word "this", therefore, only makes sense as referring to the "generation" that His audience was living in. Since all the events that Yeshua described did not happen in a literal and generalised way during that audience's lifetime, the parrots are forced to massage the word "this" until it refers to some future "generation" during which the events of Matthew 24 will all happen. That may make partial sense if you absorb Yeshua's words as written words, where the word "this" is often used to refer to words in the preceding sentences, which points to how eschatological parrots constantly perceive God's prophetic word as static and inert, unaware that it is actually dynamic and flowing
• Hence, if the word "this" actually referred to the audience that Yeshua was speaking to, we must understand that "generation" cannot be understood as a specific and short period of chronological time, as the eschatological parrots are so inclined to do. Yes, there may be a literal interpretation of the word "generation" that may fit within a certain limited context, but to try to reduce it to that not only nullifies the spoken word "this", but it also robs Yeshua's words of their deeper, prophetic meaning. Unfortunately, parrots insist on the effort to ascribe a literal number of years to this verse (see how we used the word "this", which would be ludicrous if this writer were actually speaking to you), and they do so like little kids who see Yeshua's words as a clever word riddle that they can solve with their minds. Shame on these worthless men and women! Cursed are they and worthy of eternal shame for perverting God's words and reducing Him to their own Girgashite level.
• The word "generation" was translated from genea, which actually refers to the current corrupt Adamic, fallen-nature generation of mankind, as evidenced by the use of genea in Philippians 2:15, which shows that genea refers to a spiritual genetic pool and not to a chronological time period
• The word "fulfilled" was translated from ginomai, which literally means "be" or "come into existence". Its use in Scripture points to God reaching out from within the Jewish people and into the Gentiles so as to regenerate humanity as a whole. The word ginomai also points to the awareness of the God of Israel and to a people who manifest the God of Israel to all of humanity, birthing His manifestation into existence in weakness. This is why the rebirth of the literal nation of Israel was so important in human history, but the real message behind Matthew 24:34 goes way beyond that.
• As revealed in Luke 3:5, the new generation that Yeshua is prophesying in Matthew 24:34 shall
  • Fill every valley ⇒ End the low-level human existence brought on by the Canaanite-Girgashite pastoral matriarchy run by distorted Man-Face pastors and teachers
  • Bring low every mountain and hill ⇒ Bring down Amorite strongholds that uphold the matriarchy and oppose God's Ox-Face evangelistic Kingship
  • Straighten what is crooked ⇒ End the Jebusite perversion of Lion-Face apostolic judgement-making
  • Smooth out the rough ways ⇒ End the Hittite distortion of God's Eagle-Face prophetic flow
• When the new generation arrives, the current "crooked and perverse generation" (Philippians 2:15) will pass away
  • The phrase "crooked and perverse" points to 2 spirits:
    • The word "crooked" (translated from skolios) points to the Jebusite spirit
    • The word "perverse" (translated from diastrepho) points to the Hittite spirit
  • These 2 spirits are brought in by the pastoral matriarchy in order to establish some semblance of order and to generate some measure of spiritual power to maintain itself
  • The Jebusite and Hittite spirits are the spirits that unleash the strongest attacks against God's remnant during the 5th-seal period, after the soul system and its leadership has been clearly exposed as fundamentally flawed and destructive
    • The Jebusite spirit vitriolically punishes those who have dared to oppose the soul system
    • The Hittite spirit ruthlessly tortures those who have dared to oppose the soul system
• The word "pass" in Matthew 24:34 was translated from parerchomai, which points to a transition from the first-Adam generation (ruled by the Eve-ish soul) to a last-Adam generation (ruled by a "male", Spirit-centric Adam)
  • The word for "generation" (genea) is derived from gune, meaning "woman". Therefore, the Lord is declaring that the rule of the "female" soul will ironically be ended by "womanly-weak" believers who are willing to go through the birth pains required to birth the manifestation of this new generation on Earth.
• Matthew 24:34 is not predicting an event; it is establishing a requirement
  • A chronological day can end with something happening or not happening; a day continues to tick down regardless. For example, a day in which a certain game is scheduled to be played can end without the game being played if the game is cancelled for some reason. The game's cancellation does not mean that the day will not end when the clock strikes midnight.
  • Yeshua was not predicting that "all these things" will come to pass before this generation passes. Using our example, we can say that Yeshua was not predicting that the "game" would not be cancelled and that it would definitely be played before the end of the "day".
  • Instead, Yeshua is saying,
    You want this generation to pass? Then all these things must happen first. Why? Because these things will be what shall produce this generation's demise and the rise of God's generation, the generation of the sons of God
  • This is like saying, "This bottle's contents will not be drunk until the bottle is opened". This does not mean, "I am predicting that the bottle will be opened before someone drinks the bottle", Instead, it means, "the bottle cannot be drunk unless the bottle is opened"
  • Hence, Matthew 24:34 is saying that God has decreed that this crooked and perverse generation cannot pass away unless all these painful and difficult things come to pass, meaning that the painless and sacrifice-free transition that the "beam-me-up-Jesus", magical-rapture Church is expecting shall not come to pass

• The words "heaven" (ouranos), "earth" (ge), and "pass away" (parerchomai) reveal (through Matthew 5:18) that God's spiritual laws must be fulfilled (i.e. given their true and full spiritual meaning) before the old generation can pass away and the new generation can emerge
  • This contradicts the matriarchal Church's belief that this era of "grace" means that we are in a "lawless" era
• The word "words" was translated from logos, which points directly to apostolic judgement word
  • ⇒ Heaven and earth (and, hence, the first-Adam generation) cannot pass away until the awareness of God's judgement nature is restored and His judgements are allowed to flow with freedom throughout the Earth

• A literal understanding of this verse, along with a matriarchal understanding of what "being God" is, would force us to conclude that Yeshua was not God
  • Therefore, this verse reveals that the God Essence can manifest different qualities depending on the role and context it is operating in
  • It also points to how God's remnant, who carry out angelic actions on Earth, are forced to abide in a state of 5th-seal ambiguity and uncertainty (which is often frustrating and excruciating) because that is part of the role that we are to play as sons of God
• The words "day" (hemera) and "hour" (hora) together point to Matthew 20:6-12, and, hence, to times of sudden impartations, when people will receive in one instant what may taken others months and years to obtain
• As shown by Matthew 24:48-51 and Luke 12:45-49, the words "day" (hemera) and "hour" (hora) together also point to the permanent demotion of the matriarchal priesthood that has worked to suppress God's manifestation on Earth.
  • The phrases "looking for" and "being aware of" in Matthew 24:48-51 and Luke 12:45-49 were translated from prosdokao, which speaks of "expectation" and "foreseeing" and points directly to 2 Peter 3:12-14
    • ⇒ The word "day" points to when the elements will be destroyed (2 Peter 3:12-14), a day to be longed for and hastened, which is contrary to what the matriarchals long for and do
    • The Old-Covenant, matriarchal Church is not expecting this day, the day of God, because they do not know (ginosko) God at the heart level; being disconnected from God at the heart level, they have no true understanding of what God's day is all about
• The joint appearances of "day" and "hour" in other verses reveal that these 2 words from Matthew 24:36 also point to the following:
  • Luke 22:53: A preceding hour of darkness that requires green-horse sacrificial death from the remnant
  • Acts 2:15, John 11:9, & Acts 10:3: The release of extraordinary power that releases the Dominion of God into the Earth
  • Acts 16:18: The ejection of matriarchal paradigms from the face of the Earth
  • Revelation 9:15: The need for the galloping of the 4 horses first, a painful transition process whose weight shall be borne by God's faithful remnant, as clearly revealed by the preceding verses in Matthew 24
• The words "day" (hemera) and "hour" (hora) appear together 15 times in the 4 Gospels and Acts, only to appear together again until the book of Revelation
  • ⇒ The "day and hour" of Matthew 24:36 can only be revealed upon the Earth through the deliberate acts of proactive believers, which goes against the passive, "let-us-wait-for-Jesus-to-rapture-us-up" attitude that matriarchal believers are so bent on upholding
• The 4 appearances of "day" and "hour" together in the book of Acts points to the 4 horses of the Apocalypse:
  • The white-horse epiphany of Acts 2:15
  • The red-horse tradition-challenging of Acts 10:3
  • The black-horse journey from Joppa to Caesarea of Acts 10:30
  • The green-horse sacrifice (by Paul and Silas) of Acts 16:18
• The words "day" (hemera) and "hour" (hora) appear together in 16 verses of Scripture. Its 17th appearance will be in real life, when the remnant are finally manifested on Earth

• To reduce "eating and drinking" and "marrying and giving in marriage" to literal interpretations is to reduce Yeshua's words to utter foolishness
• Don't these verses reveal that things are supposed to appear "OK" on the surface prior to the upheaval? Doesn't this contradict the eschatological parrots' timelines of a magical "rapture" followed by a period of hell on Earth for the entire unbelieving world before His return?
• The word "flood" was translated from kataklysmos, which speaks of a violent transformation marked by overwhelming upheaval and demolition
• The phrase "eating and drinking" speaks of soulish people fulfilling Girgashite, material ends
  • Eating: Fulfilling basic material needs
  • Drinking: Seeking after earthly things with an evangelistic spirit of conquest
• The phrase "marrying and giving in marriage" speaks of soulish people fulfilling Canaanite, emotion-centric ends
  • Marrying: Fulfilling basic emotional needs
  • Giving in marriage: Using emotional needs as a way to conquer people (by turning themselves into the source through which those being conquered can fulfil their emotional needs)
  • This promotion of soulish "marriage" also works to squelch of the angelic nature in believers; it is through angelic actions that the spiritual Noah's will bring about the flood (kataklysmos) of Matthew 24:38
• The word "ark" was translated from kibotos, which is used 6 times in Scripture: 3 times to refer to Noah's ark and the 3 other to refer to the Ark of the Covenant
  • ⇒ The word "ark" refers to believers exercising the Melchizedek priesthood, entering into the fullness of their angelic nature to carry out God's judgements and establish the Kingship of the Spirit

• The word "knew" was translated from ginosko ⇒ Matriarchals have no heart knowledge
• As shown by the previous verses, the focus of the Lord's words is on the Church, i.e. those who pretend to be with Him but who do not know, or understand, in their hearts the unfolding of all these events
• The phrase "took them all away" was translated from airo, which means "to raise up, elevate" ⇐ This is the closest that Matthew 24 comes to referring to the matriarchal Church's magical rapture
• The word "all" in "took them all away" was translated from hapas meaning "all, the whole, altogether"
  • ⇒ Both those inside the ark and those outside were elevated during the flood (those inside as protected beings, and those outside as cadavers)
• Verse 38 does not say "Noe and his family went into the ark". It only says, "Noe went into the ark", meaning that Yeshua was referring to a single person, not to a plurality of people. Therefore, it cannot be simplistically argued that "all" is referring to Noah's family specifically. If Yeshua was focusing on the "rising" of those inside the ark, He would either have said "Noe and his family" in verse 38 or have said "and took him away" in verse 39. That is why "all" must be taken to mean "all". In fact, the only "plural" group that Yeshua refers to in verse 38 are those "eating and drinking" and those who are "marrying and giving in marriage", which can only point to the "unwitting unbelievers", not to "believers". Also, verse 39 clearly says, and "knew not until the flood came", meaning that the "all", if anything, refers to those who were unaware of God's work and had no understanding of what was coming. In other words, if "all" is not "all", then the only option left of who is being "raised up" are the unbelievers, not the believers!!!
  • ∴ Even if you try to twist verses 38 and 39 into becoming "proof" that Yeshua spoke of the matriarchal rapture in Matthew 24, you must conclude that only the non-believers will be "raised up"
  • ⇒ Verses 38 and 39, like the rest of Matthew 24, contradict the notion of escapist rapture where only the (devout) believers are raised up whilst the rest are "left behind" to suffer
• Since Yeshua says that "all" will be "raised up" (airo), we can conclude that this is the time when God will force all people, especially believers, to rise from the earthly level and operate as spirit beings (which is what God intended from the beginning when created Adam). Those who are not ready or willing will perish in the process, and those who are ready will thrive and regenerate the Earth

• The word "taken" was translated from paralambano meaning "to embrace, to welcome with open arms"
  • As we saw with verses 38 and 39, the matriarchal concept of a rapture does not apply here
  • This is reinforced by the fact that the word paralambano does not have a "vertical" connotation to it (i.e. it does not speak of being "caught up" or "taken up". Instead, it has a direct connotation of being either accepted or rejected.
• The word "left" was translated from aphiemi, which is the word used throughout Scripture to mean "forgive". Therefore, a perfectly valid translation could say "one shall be received, and the other forgiven"
  • ∴ Unless we are willing to ignore the entire context of Matthew 24 up until verse 40, we must conclude that Yeshua is declaring that one (believer) will be embraced by God unto Himself, whilst the other (believer) will simply be forgiven of his sins and nothing more (as per 1 Corinthians 3:15)
• "Going out" (to the field) speaks of the "male" endowments (of apostle, prophet, and evangelist) ⇒ This verse speaks of God's judgement of how believers use the 3 "male" endowments
• Considering how literal the eschatological parrots are about interpreting these verses, are they willing to believe that Yeshua is speaking about people out in the literal field? What if they are not farmers? Are Yeshua's words so shallow that He could only be talking about farmers, or people "at the office" (if you want to stretch the concept of "field" a bit)?

• The verse does not mention women, but it is safe to infer (for several reasons) that the 2 referred to are indeed women, meaning that, just as verse 40 points to the "male" endowments, this verse points to the "female" ministerial endowments of pastor and teacher
• The word "grind" was translated from aletho, which is only used twice, both times in the same context, and is derived from aleuron meaning "wheat flour", which itself is ... only used twice as well
  • The first (and only other) time that aleuron is used is in Matthew 13:33, which speaks of the 3 types of righteous leaven that the "female" ministries should enable so as to foster the 3 "male" endowments:
    • Apostolic anger
    • Prophetic< rebellion
    • Evangelistic confidence
• The matriarchal "grinders" will promote distorted versions of these 3 types of leaven:
  • Jebusite anger against anyone who opposes the religious, matriarchal system
  • Hittite distortions that rebel against God's truth, favouring what is appealing to the soul
  • Amorite pride based on earthly credentials validated by the religious, matriarchal system
• The word "mill" was translated from mylon, which is not used in any other verse of Scripture, and is derived from mylos meaning "millstone"
  • The word mylos is strongly related in Scripture to the word skandalizo, which is used by the Holy Spirit to speak of religious rocks of stumbling
  • Therefore, the word "mill" spiritually points to the religious rocks of stumbling that suppress the righteous leaven, putting religious hindrances around it in order to quench it
  • It is like standing at an exit waiting, in case something comes out in order to kill it (Hosea 6:9). This is what the matriarchal grinders do at the mill. These are the ones "left behind", i.e. not embraced by God but simply forgiven of their sins and nothing more.
  • The word mylos reveals (through Revelation 18:21-22) that the stumbling block that the matriarchal grinders erect shall be destroyed through horme acts of (spiritual) violence carried out by a group of people (the remnant) determined to obliterate those who are engaged in matriarchal activities. This requires exhibiting behaviour that will be seen as unsightly and inappropriate, as devoid of "Christian" qualities of "love, tolerance, and mutual understanding"; these violent believers will forcefully steer the "humanity ship" into the straight direction of the Spirit and away from the wayward and wasteful wanderings of the soul.
• If the above is not the true meaning behind the passage above, what could it possibly mean? If this verse is to be taken literally, as the eschatological parrots are so inclined to do, should we take it to refer only to an agricultural setting where women stand around a mill grinding (something that rarely applies in modern times)? Or should we simplistically reduce it to Yeshua talking about women performing menial house chores? If so, why wouldn't the Lord simply talk about a woman cleaning up or watching over the kids at home? Or was Yeshua simply using vague poetic language? Are evangelicals willing to be that insulting to Yeshua, belittling His words and making them verbose and redundant?
• Also, if we are to take these words literally, is Yeshua predicting a 50% rapture ratio? If the matriarchals are so right about the churchgoers being the ones "raptured up" when the magical moment comes, why are these 2 women at the same mill? Wouldn't all the "good Christian women" be in one "mill" (the "Church mill") whilst all the "unsaved/wayward women" are grinding at another mill (the "mill of the unsaved")? Why does Yeshua reduce it to single individuals (one embraced and one simply forgiven)? Why is there no sense of "collectiveness" about Yeshua's words in these verses? Don't all the previous verses in Matthew 24 actually validate that those who will be embraced (paralambano or "taken") shall be believers going through a lonely journey of persecution and affliction that will only be exacerbated by the religious system, not the pagan world? This is why the Lord speaks of individuals, not groups, in these verses.

• The word "watch" was translated from gregoreo, which has the connotation of a "vigil"
• In the matriarchals' understanding of the end times, what use is there for this verse? If the basic concern is to be a church member in good standing at the time of the rapture, what are we to be in a state of "watch" or "vigil" for? Shouldn't the rapture just happen automatically without us having to do anything other than go about our daily affairs? Also, if we are willing to accept the Church's magical rapture, wouldn't this verse actually hint that some "Christians" will be "left behind" to suffer in the matriarchal Church's "great tribulation" period? Doesn't this begin to cut into the "saved by grace" message, the automatic-salvation message of the Church? As we have said before, the contradictions that the Church's theology logically lead to derive from its simplistic understanding of what "salvation" is. Since "salvation" is nothing more to the matriarchals than escaping from hell and going to church until you kick the bucket, they end up with many "uncomfortable" passages throughout Scripture that begin to contradict the concept of a salvation that is not forged by works.
• The word gregoreo points to watching lest one's shame is revealed (aschemosyne)
  • Those who do not watch are those who work (katergomai) aschemosyne ("shame") by abandoning the "natural (physikos) use of woman"
  • The "natural" use of "woman" (i.e. the "female" endowments) is done by ...
    • ... providing pastoral refreshing of the soul
    • ... providing pastoral temporal support (for the moment)
    • ... providing teaching without falling into repetitive, long-winded traditions that pretend to be prophetic but do not break through
    • ... providing teaching without binding the flow of prophetic freedom and snuffing evangelistic boldness
  • Pastors work shame by their omissions; teachers work shame by their overdoing
  • Those practising the "female" endowments in a distorted way believe that their work is inherently eternal in nature, without accepting that it is temporary work to further an eternal, "male", Spirit-centric end (i.e. a means to an end rather than an end in itself)

• The word "goodman" was translated from oikodespotes, which literally means "ruler of the house" and is related to posis meaning "husband"
  • ⇒ It points to the male head of the house and to a believer carrying out a spiritually "male" role
• The despotes portion of oikodespotes is derived from deo meaning "to bind", which Scripture shows is spiritually related to establishing God's evangelistic Kingship on Earth
• Again, how does this verse make any sense in the matriarchal Church's "eschatological timeline"? If the rapture is about us being taken out of danger, why should we be on the lookout? Wouldn't it be a "good surprise" if the "thief" suddenly shows up, since that mean that we are being taken up to heaven to get away from the Great Tribulation? in fact, why should we even think of the Lord as a "thief" ? What is He coming to take from us? Wouldn't He instead be coming to give us something we all would "desire", namely safety from the judgement to come?
• Even if we overcome the above questions, a deeper question would remain? Why would we want to prevent Yeshua breaking into our home? Wouldn't it be a good thing for Him to enter our home? All of these questions reveal why the matriarchals' understanding of the end makes absolutely no sense. A matriarchal may want to argue that Matthew 24:43 is only for unbelievers, but there is absolutely no evidence in the surrounding context that Yeshua suddenly stopped talking to believers and started addressing unbelievers. Even if we could convince ourselves that Yeshua was somehow talking about unbelievers, the question would be, Why should unbelievers be sure to keep Yeshua out and not allow them to break in? Besides, Matthew 24:42 says, "you do not know what hour your Lord comes?" Does that sound like a word to unbelievers?
• Some other matriarchals may want to argue that the passage above is a warning to lukewarm believers in order to prevent them being left behind in the "rapture". If that is the case, what is the criterion that God will use to determine which believers go and which "stay behind"? Is it based on whether you are attending church on a regular basis? Is it based on whether you are reading your Bible passage of the day every day? Even if those questions could somehow be cleared up somehow, isn't the rapture about us being taken away, as opposed to any possession of ours being taken away (for that is what "thieves" do)? Notice that Matthew 24:43 speaks of someone staying put, not escaping. Because of all of this, the only way that Matthew 24:43 can make any sense is by discarding the Church's eschatological "understanding" and discerning the true spiritual meaning (hidden from natural view) that is behind the words spoken by the Lord.
• The phrase "broken up" was translated from diorysso meaning "to dig through", which, as shown by its use in Scripture, speaks of someone hiding something that has been entrusted to him and who is only thinking in terms of self-benefit
  • ⇒ The "thief" is actually coming back for something that is actually His
• God detaches Himself from the gifts and the callings that He gives to us, allowing us the opportunity to show how we would behave if the gifts were ours, with no need to worry about a constant supervision from the ultimate owner. Those who bury their gift because they see no point in prospering someone else's gift will be left eternally deprived when the owner digs through and into his house to take back what is His. Those who take the gift unto themselves and hide it from the real owner, using it only for their own benefit, will also be left eternally deprived when the owner digs through and into his house to take back what is His. The first case are those who work shame for themselves through pastoral omissions; the second case are those who work shame for themselves through teacherly "overdoings". In both cases, eternal shame shall be dealt out when the "thief" comes and exposes them for what they really are. This is the real reason why the Lord called us to watch for the time when the "thief" comes (and not for the time when God's "rapture" spacecraft will come to take us to a magical la-la land of pastoral bliss).

• The word "ready" was translated from hetoimos, which, in Scripture points to ...
  • ... readiness to wage war and avenge
  • ... readiness to evangelistically expand God's Kingship on Earth
  • ... readiness to apostolically make incursions into new spiritual territories
  • ⇒ The word hetoimos speaks of readiness to carry out angelic actions
• The word "think" was translated from dokeo meaning "opinion", which points to the choice between the individual stance of a lone John the Baptist and the collective opinion of the religious establishment
• In the latter days, the Temple's stones will not be allowed to stand one upon another
• The readiness of verse 44 is individual in nature and cannot depend on collective support; those who depend on collective support to form their opinions shall not be ready for when the Son of Man shall come
• Those ready to develop an individual opinion in the Lord are those who rise (egeiro) from collective slumber. Those who worship the temple (i.e. the religious structures) and what is within it will not be ready. Only those who are willing to measure and judge the temple with a reed shall be ready.
• Those unwilling to move away from repeating the same thoughts over and over again will not be ready
• Those unwilling to hear God pray into their hearts, who treat Him as a distant entity that they mail requests to, will not be ready
• Those who embrace the tax-extorting matriarchal system will not be ready for the Lord's coming and will instead be ready to spiritually murder those who speak of the Lord's manifestation in the Spirit
• Those who expect a "second coming" that fits their natural understanding will not be ready. The Lord's return will be so foreign and terrifying to their natural souls that they will only begin to discern it until it is too late to be ready for it.
• To avoid being unready, you must be ready to see a blurring of the lines between the natural and the spiritual when the Lord manifests Himself. This is what the eschatological parrots who claim to understand God's prophetic word fail and refuse to understand. That is why they are not ready for the coming of the Son of Man.
• Those who shall be ready will appear weak on the outside, and they shall have gone through a process of separation from the soul system in order to be given an infusion of the Spirit through "angel food". That is how they shall become ready.
• If we are to discard all of the above and simply read Matthew 24 from the light of the matriarchals' eschatology, what is there to be "ready" about? Shouldn't we just go on with business as usual, as verses 40 and 41 seem to indicate to the matriarchals? Shouldn't we simply continue going to church and living our lives before being pleasantly surprised by Jesus and his "magical rapture"? The matriarchals may want to argue, yet again, that being ready boils down to being "saved", i.e. repeating the prayer of salvation, and attending church regularly, accepting and defending the church's religious paradigms and structures as you do. But, then, we must ask again, Why would Yeshua be saying these words to His close disciples? Wouldn't they already be ready given that they already believe in Him? Or do the matriarchals think that Yeshua looked away from His disciples and spoke into the cold night darkness as He uttered the words in verse 44, as if talking to the unsaved masses that would be reading His words in a printed Bible? Really? How much do you have to twist and alter God's words to make it fit your soulish agenda, matriarchals?

Angelic service

"Who then is a faithful and wise servant, whom his lord hath made ruler over his household, to give them meat in due season?" (Matthew 24:45)

Possessions

"Blessed is that servant, whom his lord when he cometh shall find so doing" (Matthew 24:46)

"Verily I say unto you, That he shall make him ruler over all his goods." (Matthew 24:47)

The kakos servant v. Gabriel

"48 But and if that evil servant shall say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming; 49 And shall begin to smite his fellowservants, and to eat and drink with the drunken" (Matthew 24:48-49)

Smiting

"48 But and if that evil servant shall say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming; 49 And shall begin to smite his fellowservants, and to eat and drink with the drunken" (Matthew 24:48-49)

The dichotomous

"The lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him, and in an hour that he is not aware of" (Matthew 24:50)

"And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth" (Matthew 24:51)